Search This Blog

Friday, December 8, 2023

John Stott - The Place of Israel

 

The Place of Israel
by John Stott [1]

Rector Emeritus,  All Souls Church, London, England


Our topic has been announced as “The Place of Israel,” and the topic that has been set for us is an object lesson in biblical hermeneutics as it’s usually called in the principles of interpreting the Bible.  But I would like to remind you right at the beginning that there are at least four ways in which the word “Israel,” whose place we are to investigate, can be used.

One:     Israel was that devious scoundrel, the second son of Isaac, whose first name was Jacob – meaning “he who deceived or he who struggles,” who amply lived up to his name – but whom God renames “Israel,” because having struggled with men all his life, he at last came to struggle with God for the blessing he needed (a blessing to which he was not entitled).

Two:     Israel is the chosen people of the Old Testament days – the 12 tribes descended from the 12 sons of Jacob called the children of Israel, because Israel (or Jacob) was a common ancestor.

Three:   Israel is the messianic community – the people of Jesus – the true descendents of Abraham because they share Abraham’s faith.  This includes Gentiles like most of us if we believe in Jesus, but excludes Jews who don’t.  When Paul ended his letter to the Galatians, “Peace and mercy upon the Israel of God,” he was referring to believers in Jesus, whatever their ethnic origin.  So Israel is the messianic community.

Four:    Israel today, for many people if you read the newspapers, is the Israeli nation, promised a national home by the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and given it in 1948.

So Israel has four meaning.  It means Jacob.  It means Jews.  It means Christians.  And it means Israelis.  And that is just the problem when you are asked who you are talking about.

To read further click HERE.






_________________________________________________________

1. John Stott was ordained into the ministry of the Church of England in 1945. He served as the senior pastor (rector) of All Souls Church in London from 1950-1975. He became Rector Emeritus in 1975 and devoted his life to a ministry of teaching worldwide, and writing.  Stott has written over 40 books. His best known, “Basic Christianity”, has been translated into more than 50 languages. Other titles include “The Cross of Christ,” The Contemporary Christian,”  “ Evangelical Truth,” “New Issues Facing Christians Today,” and eight New Testament expositions.








Monday, November 27, 2023

BEHOLD THE DAYS ARE COMING

 

The prophecy of Jeremiah, written about 600 years B.C., is foretelling the eventual judgment of southern Israel, Judah.  The Northern tribes had already been sent into captivity.  Babylon's assault was pending.

Throughout the prophecy, Jeremiah includes phrases of hope -- hope of a restoration.  But none is as clear as is recorded in Jeremiah 23:5–6 (ESV)

5 “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the land. 6 In his days Judah will be saved, and Israel will dwell securely. And this is the name by which he will be called: ‘The Lord is our righteousness.’

There are some expositors that choose to leave the time of the prophecy's fulfillment as open. "The expression days are coming is very general and has no particular time reference." [1] There are others who are adamant that this prophecy will be fulfilled in a physical, temporal Millennial reign. For example: This is referring to "Israel’s regathering and the righteous Branch will occur during the millennial reign following the Great Tribulation." [2]

I believe "the days" refer to the time between Christ's advent and His Second Coming. I also believe that the time stamp is clear.  I hold to that belief for 3 reasons:

#1. The formula "Behold the days".

In this chapter, Jeremiah uses that phrase twice (v5 and v7).  He will use it again in the well-known chapter on the New Covenant. ““Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord.” (Jeremiah 31:31–32, ESV)

The writer to the Hebrews in chapters 8:8bff and 10:15 clearly applies that formula to the Christian Church. In classic Biblical hermeneutics, we interpret the Old by the New.  The author to the book of Hebrews would view Jeremiah's prophecy as applying to the Church, the true offspring of Abraham, all those who have faith in Jesus Christ.  Just as the New Covenant was inaugurated by Jesus, so the Messianic reign was inaugurated at His advent.

#2. The Branch of David.

The second time stamp in this passage is the reference to the Branch of David.  Thompson comments: "The metaphor is of a shoot (ṣemaḥ) bursting forth from the Davidic tree (i.e., the dynasty), which, though cut off, is not dead. English versions have generally translated the word as Branch. In postexilic times the term became the classic technical one for the expected ideal king (Zech. 3:8; 6:12) [3].

No one disputes that the Branch, or better, the Shoot, is referring to Jesus Christ, the expected Messiah.  Jeremiah likely got that hint from Isaiah who prophesied 100 years before.  “There shall come forth a shoot from the stump of Jesse, and a branch from his roots shall bear fruit. And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.” (Isaiah 11:1–2, ESV).  Jesus Himself citing a parallel passage (“The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me, because the Lord has anointed me to bring good news to the poor; he has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to those who are bound;” (Isaiah 61:1, ESV) affirmed that this was about Him. (Luke 4:18-19).  Jesus believed that He was the One prophesied and He was currently engaged in the ministry foretold. 

#3. The Salvation of Israel.

In Romans 11:26 (ESV), Paul clearly tells us that he is thinking of the Old Testament restorative literature when he writes, "26 And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”.  Certainly, when the audience read "in this way all Israel will be saved" they must have thought of: In his days Judah will be saved, and Israel will dwell securely. And this is the name by which he will be called: ‘The Lord is our righteousness.’” (Jeremiah 23:6, ESV)

Paul was writing of contemporary things.  He describes how God has not rejected Israel, but in fact has a glorious plan of salvation based upon His electing mercies. "In this way all Israel" will be saved.  In other words, what is happening right now, as it happened to him, is how Israel will be saved.

Conclusion

Surely the authorial intent of the prophecy of Jeremiah 23:5-6, is to point us to the Coming of the Messiah at His birth and His ministry throughout the last days until His Second Return. “. . . Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.” (1 Corinthians 15:23–25, ESV)

So, it was with great cause and abundant joy that the father of John the Baptist would exclaim:

". . .“Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, for he has visited and redeemed his people and has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David, as he spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets from of old, that we should be saved from our enemies and from the hand of all who hate us; to show the mercy promised to our fathers and to remember his holy covenant, the oath that he swore to our father Abraham, to grant us that we, being delivered from the hand of our enemies, might serve him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before him all our days.” (Luke 1:67–75, ESV)  

To God be the Glory.




___________________________________________________

1. Thompson, J. A. (1980). The Book of Jeremiah (p. 489). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

2. Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M., eds. (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (p. 1466). Thomas Nelson.

3. Thompson, J. A. (1980). The Book of Jeremiah (p. 489). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.









 




Thursday, November 23, 2023

It’s Not Fair I Had To Go Through This Disease.

The death of Matthew Perry on October 28, 2023, was tragic and brought real grief to many.  It ought to be considered tragic not because of his popularity but because Matthew Perry was a human being created in God’s image. Although tarnished in us all, this imago Deo is what made him a person of dignity, value and honour.  His death is a tragic loss.   He starred on TV’s popular show Friends. Matthew Perry, the Emmy-nominated actor died at 54.  Perry's 10 seasons on Friends made him one of Hollywood's most recognizable actors, starring opposite Jennifer Aniston, Courteney Cox, Matt LeBlanc, Lisa Kudrow and David Schwimmer as a friend group in New York City.

On the CBC National, October 29, 2023, a video clip of Perry being interviewed by __ was shown in part.  It can be viewed here: https://youtu.be/vrZsyBhmMro?si=yUhRity3Wu3clmHC.  It was in this interview that Perry left his saddest legacy.  It was in this interview that mental health as social condition was given its greatest setback.  This is not a condemnation of Perry, for he simply parroted what our culture teaches. Much of my concerns can be heard approximately at 29:25:00 minutes in the interview.

He talks about going into Rehab and says, “I was placed in some kind of spiritual guys office and we talked a little bit and as we were done talking he turned around . . . And said ‘just remember it’s not your fault’ . . . and I said ‘what do you mean it’s not my fault, I’m the one who’s doing it what do you mean’?  And he saved my life because I then knew that it wasn’t my fault that I it was that I wasn’t weaker.  It wasn’t my will that was screwed up. It was that I have this disease  and I need to get help . . .  It’s not fair.  It’s not fair that I had to go through this disease while the other five didn’t.” (Emphasis mine.)

The most pervasive and culturally acceptable paradigm to view addiction is to view it through the lens of a disease model.  The backstory to Perry’s condition was that as a 14 year old, he and several of his friends drank excessively.  His alcoholism and drug abuse continued but theirs didn’t.  His conclusion: they didn’t have the disease.  He did.  By his own story, the disease model gave him something to hang his hat on. But here’s the problem: the disease model didn’t heal the disease.  The other problem in his story is that the disease model proves it to be unfair and ultimately created a mentality of victimhood.  He was dealt a bad hand and he got the disease.

This blog is not to be dismissive of Matthew Perry. I felt nothing but compassion for him as I learned his story. He truly was a victim — but not of drugs and alcohol.  He was a victim of a health system that views non-organic crises as diseases rather than sicknesses of the soul.  Full disclosure, I am no expert in this field of discussion and I admit that the secular literature supporting the “disease model” is enormous.  My only claim is my view that the Bible is the inerrant authority and sufficient authority of matters of the soul.  My expertise is questionable. My God is irrefutable. 

The Bible describes the soul of human beings as broken.  It is malfunctioning.  The word ‘futile’ describes its ability, meaning that it cannot do what it was intended to do. The Bible is also clear that the cause of the soul’s condition is sin or stated otherwise rebellion from God.  Where the problem is “non-organic” or “a matter of the soul” the remedy can only be found in the Creator of the human soul.  Genesis 2:7 (ESV): “. . . then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.”  That word “creature” in the ESV is from the Hebrew word translated into English to be “living being” or soul.

The Bible doesn’t avoid the matter of alcoholism or addiction.  Note:

Proverbs 23:29–32 (ESV): “Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaining? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who tarry long over wine; those who go to try mixed wine. Do not look at wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup and goes down smoothly. In the end it bites like a serpent and stings like an adder.”

Without addressing matters of the soul it is impossible to resolve non-organic problems. Proverbial wisdom from the Scriptures remind us that issues of the soul determine vitality of life. We read in Proverbs 4:23 (ESV): “Keep your heart [= soul] with all vigilance, for from it flow the springs of life.”

Again, I have nothing but sadness and compassion for Matthew Perry.  His story is a stark reminder that those who are afflicted non-organic horrors should seek the only true Physician of the soul. There are specific matters of human suffering that cannot be resolved by determination, discipline, doctors or drugs.  Matters of soul-sickness can only be healed through the Great Physician, the Lord Jesus Christ.

Matthew 11:28–30 (ESV): “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. ‘Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.’”







Monday, October 30, 2023

The Half-Baked Sermon: Missing Ingredients in Much Preaching


By Jeremy Walker, Desiring God.


“What is the problem? . . . He may be delivering a lecture rather than a sermon, even if warmer rather than cooler in tone. He may offer “hot systematics” — an accurate treatment of a theological topic delivered with deep conviction. He may provide a biblical-theological survey, tracing the sweep of revelation along a particular line, but not anchored to any one part of it . . .. Sometimes fire in the pulpit masks a lack of warmth in the material, like delivering a frozen pizza in a heated bag. Often the context is provided, all the words are explained, the strict sense is given. By the end of such a sermon, the congregation might know much of what a text says. At the same time, they may know nothing of what it actually means for them.
“ (Emphasis Mine)

To read more click HERE.


Saturday, September 23, 2023

An excellent example as how to resolve conflict.

 

https://www.9marks.org/conversations/on-pastoral-public-tone-with-kevin-deyoung-pastors-talk-ep-245/


In this Pastors Talk episode, Jonathan Leeman (9Marks) interviews Mark Dever (Baptist) and Kevin DeYoung (Reformed) on pastoral, public tone; and the correction of brothers. This interview also gives help to disagreeing in public.


Principles:


  1. The offended acted quickly when he saw/heard something that was wrong.
  2. The offended got counsel from others what to do. This is not gossip.
  3. The offended wrote directly in a clear, honest way. He wrote because he could articulate his concerns clearly and carefully.
  4. The offended was very gracious when the offender apologized.
  5. The offender know that the one taking offence. should be happy that he grow and learn by this. 
  6. They knew each other well, by character thus having confidence that their concerns would be handled graciously and seriously.
  7. The offender called right away after receiving the rebuke and repented.
  8. The offender, when realizing his error did what he could to make it right. 
  9. The effectiveness of the resolution was directly based on the good relationship of the parties and the trust that they could speak of such things confidently. There is wisdom to know how a rebuke might land. 
  10. To be able to communicate in such manner is to respect the other party and assume that they will hear what they’re saying.  He is assuming that the other will not take it out of context, make light of it, be resentful toward it.


Build the kind of relationships that this level of discussion can take place. Unfortunately I have experienced several significant issues that I feel unable to address with a person because their response to conflict has been defensiveness, counter-attack, failure to really listen to my concerns, making light of it, or oppositely becoming distant and resentful.


I pray today that if I am that way, the Lord will hear my repentance and give grace.









Saturday, September 9, 2023

Are You Blessed, Or Are You Trying To Be Blessed?

Have you heard the Beatitudes preached this way:“If you are poor in spirit enough, if you are sad enough, if you are hungering and thirsting enough, THEN, you will be blessed.”


The sermon sounds like a conditional reward.  If you are this, you get that.  But “this word [blessed] affirms a state of blessing that already exists. Each beatitude declares that a group of people usually regarded as afflicted is actually blessed.” (TOW, Bible Commentary) The word blessed is an adjectival noun, meaning that it serves as an indicative and a descriptive. The Bible describes a people who are called. They are “the” called indicating who they are; and they are the “called” noting the action being done to them.  So it is with the Blessed.  They are THE blessed indicating who they are by description and they are the blessed indicating what is happening to them.  Matthew uses the word ‘blessed’ in both ways.  


One might successfully argue that we cannot be Christians unless we are poor in spirit, or mourn over sin.  Jesus simply declares that those people are already blessed.  Non-Christians would think otherwise.  To the contrary Jesus is saying to us as citizens of His kingdom that you are blessed, despite the fact of being poor in spirit, persecuted, hungry — hungering for righteousness, etc. You are a blessed people, not a cursed people.  And then He adds to each of the eight a promise connected with that assertion.  To personalize the text one might say: “My meekness is not the condition of the cursed, it is the condition of the blessed.  Therefore the promise to us (Blessed is in the plural) that we all who are meek will inherit the earth.”  


Perhaps you will read the Beatitudes differently and “rejoice and be glad”.



Friday, July 28, 2023

New Gospel or No Gospel

Introductory Essay to John Owen’s Death of Death in the Death of Christ by J. I. Packer[1]

 

This introductory essay is worth every moment the reader will take to digest every thought of the late Dr. J.I. Packer.  In these initial paragraphs Dr. Packer sets the stage by comparing two Gospels.  It is not a comparison of heresy versus orthodoxy, because both “Gospels” have the similar content and words.  The difference lies in what and how the “Gospels” are communicated.  In his own words he writes, “The whole perspective and emphasis of gospel preaching has changed.” This new Gospel has been categorized as “attractional”, “user-friendly”, “relevant”, or “therapeutic”.  I have found that you have to attend or observe services of this type rather than try to categorize them.  But in Dr. Packer’s words they are centred upon this “new Gospel”.  Note Packer’s comparison:

 

“. . . Without realising it, we have during the past century bartered that gospel for a substitute product which, though it looks similar enough in points of detail, is as a whole a decidedly different thing. Hence our troubles; for the substitute product does not answer the ends for which the authentic gospel has in past days proved itself so mighty. 

 

The new gospel conspicuously fails to produce deep reverence, deep repentance, deep humility, a spirit of worship, a concern for the church. Why? We would suggest that the reason lies in its own character and content. It fails to make men God-centred in their thoughts and God-fearing in their hearts because this is not primarily what it is trying to do.One way of stating the difference between it and the old gospel is to say that it is too exclusively concerned to be “helpful” to man—to bring peace, comfort, happiness, satisfaction—and too little concerned to glorify God.

 

The old gospel was “helpful,” too—more so, indeed, than is the new—but (so to speak) incidentally, for its first concern was always to give glory to God. It was always and essentially a proclamation of Divine sovereignty in mercy and judgment, a summons to bow down and worship the mighty Lord on whom man depends for all good, both in nature and in grace. Its centre of reference was unambiguously God.

 

But in the new gospel the centre of reference is man. This is just to say that the old gospel was religious in a way that the new gospel is not. Whereas the chief aim of the old was to teach men to worship God, the concern of the new seems limited to making them feel better. The subject of the old gospel was God and His ways with men; the subject of the new is man and the help God gives him . . ..”

 

As I have attended or watched these “new Gospel” churches I sense I have been drawn into a spiritualized Ted-Talk. However, in Pauline thought there is really just one Gospel.  So, this so-called “new Gospel” is actually no Gospel at all.  Attendees leave psychologically and emotionally pumped up devoid of God-centred thoughts, Christ-centred pursuits, or Word-driven behaviours. 

 

 

 



[1] https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/packer_deathintro.html

Tuesday, June 13, 2023

I Shall Return!

It was several years ago that I stood at the head of a grave. Resting on its supports was the coffin containing the remains of a believer. As in rural Alberta the graveyard was in the proximity of the home farm.  That day as I lifted my head to the horizon, I saw the farm.  This was the farm that the deceased had lived upon all his life.  This was his last home before his death. In a strange sort of way I wondered, because of the promise of the New Heaven and New Earth, would this be the very site where my deceased Brother would return in eschatological glory, at the Second Coming?  That’s a little far out, I know, but still I relished the idea of this notion.  From then on, the burial of a Believer became significant to me.  In hindsight, in my capacity as a Christian minister I was required to conduct many funeral services.  But it was the burial service of a Christian that brought me the happiest of thoughts. “We will return and inhabit this earth, all new and perfect, dwelling in exponential glory.”

 

Now let me make two disclaimers before I continue.  This article does not engage the debate between body burial and cremation.  I assume here that whether the body is embalmed or not, cremated or not, a burial still takes place. Secondly, I assume an eschatological agreement that the final state of redeemed mankind is to be residents of the New Heaven and New Earth.  Although we speak of Heaven as home, it is not.  The current Heaven that is far better and with Christ is a staging area for all who die before the Second Coming, where at that time all of God’s people from all ages will dwell on earth in service to our King.  

 

“And they sang a new song, saying, ‘Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation, and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they shall reign on the earth.’” - Revelation 5:9–10 (ESV).

 

The point I attempt to make is that there is a direct connection between the burial of a Christian and the future hope of the Christian. As Dan Vos writes, “The practice of burial stems from our beliefs in the value of the human body and the reality of the resurrection of the dead.”[1]  Early Christian tradition also adds the important feature (important at least to this discussion) that burial take place on consecrated ground. “After the establishment of the parish as the centre of the Christian spiritual life, the possession of a cemetery, as well as the baptismal font, was a mark of parochial status. During the Middle Ages, religious orders also constructed cemeteries around their churches. Thus, the most common use of churchyards was as a consecrated burial ground known as a graveyard.”[2]

 

Undoubtedly the first Biblical illustration of burial is found in the story of Abraham.  Abraham never owned land in Canaan as his offspring did.  When Sarah died, he acknowledged that to the Hittites. He worked a deal with the Hittites to purchase “for the full price . . . A burying place.” (Genesis 23:9, ESV). One might say that the only land Abraham owned in the Promised Land was a burial plot (Genesis 23:20, ESV).  “Abraham’s purchase of the field and cave meant that his descendants would own this land in perpetuity. Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Rebekah, and Leah would later be laid to rest in this cave.” Genesis 23:20 (ESV Study Bible).  Paul writing to the Romans extends that hope of Abraham further, when he writes, “For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith.” Romans 4:13 (ESV).  We can assume then that in the mind of Abraham, he bought Sarah’s burial plot in faith that one day God fulfill His promise to give his descendants, not only the land of Canaan, but the world itself.  S.G. Degraaf notes, “Abraham buried Sarah. For him her grave was a guarantee that his seed would inherit the land and possess it forever. One day Sarah and her children would be glorified there.”

 

The hope of the promise of possessing the land, also is found in a future heir of Abraham, Joseph. We read in Genesis 50:25–26 (ESV): “Then Joseph made the sons of Israel swear, saying, ‘God will surely visit you, and you shall carry up my bones from here.’ So Joseph died, being 110 years old. They embalmed him, and he was put in a coffin in Egypt.”  Joseph is confident that the God who brought His people to Egypt will most certainly lead them out. When Joseph died his body was embalmed and entombed in a coffin.  Later, after hundreds of years of slavery and oppression, Moses led Israel out of Egypt and we note: “Moses took the bones of Joseph with him, for Joseph had made the sons of Israel solemnly swear, saying, ‘God will surely visit you, and you shall carry up my bones with you from here.’” - Exodus 13:18–19 (ESV). Later we read in Joshua 24:32 (ESV

 

“As for the bones of Joseph, which the people of Israel brought up from Egypt, they buried them at Shechem, in the piece of land that Jacob bought from the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for a hundred pieces of money. It became an inheritance of the descendants of Joseph.”

 

It was Shechem where Abraham pitched his tent and built his first altar in the Promised Land and received the first divine promise (Genesis12:6, 7).  It was here that Joseph’s body was buried.  The writer to the Hebrews records:

 

“These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city.” - Hebrews 11:13–16 (ESV).

 

Why did Joseph desire to be buried in the Promised Land?  One important reason is that Joseph’s choice of burial site was an act of faith in the promise of God that Abraham’s descendants would possess the land where he had been buried.  But Hebrews 11 expands our understanding to include the reality that the patriarchs believed not only would God give them the land of Canaan but in fact the whole world. Most people read Hebrews 11:13f and think that these men of faith were desirous of heaven — heaven being that intermediate state.  But it is far more likely that the patriarchs were looking for heaven on earth.  Nick Batzig, pastor of Church Creek PCA in Charleston, North Carolina and Associate Editor for Ligonier Ministries, Table Talk, writes: “God promised Abraham land, but--contrary to the opinions of many--this was a promise of the inheritance of the New Heavens and the New Earth that believers get in union with Christ. Abraham actually never inherited any of the land.”[3]

 

Therefore, Joseph set a typological pattern within the Old Testament story of Redemption, to insist his body be buried in the land of promise. Christians therefore can, in faith, seek to be buried in the hope of the promise, that is the earth, which is the Promised Land of the New Covenant believer.  “Burial,” as Batzig affirms, “Is an act of faith” “In short, a burial of the body of a believer is, in the truest sense, the last great act of faith that a believer may exhibit with his or her life.”[4]

 

Now let me be clear: I am not trying to invent or enforce a new doctrine.  Far be it from me to do so.  But I do propose that because of the compelling illustrations from Scripture, combined with the doctrine of the New Heavens and New Earth, there are sufficient implications to encourage a Christian to look upon his or her’s final wishes and affirm that their burial be viewed by friends and family as their final confession of faith.  As said by General MacArthur, “I shall return.”  On Oct. 20, 1944, General Douglas MacArthur waded ashore on Leyte Island in the Philippines and fulfilled his promise to return. General MacArthur’s forces in the Philippines were nearly decimated.  On withdrawing in seeming defeat, he arrived in Australia making his famous declaration: “I came through and I shall return.”  Return he did.  

 

In a sense the act of burial is a declaration, “I shall return.”   It is a final act of faith.  

 

As we place the remains of our loved ones who have died in Christ in the ground, it would be theologically sound, liturgically fitting, and pastorally encouraging to re-iterate this act of faith, “They shall return.” Often the minister’s words go something like this:

 

“Forasmuch as it hath pleased Almighty God of his great mercy to take unto himself the soul of our dear brother here departed, we therefore commit his body to the ground; earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust; in sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal life through our Lord Jesus Christ; who shall change the body of our low estate that it may be like unto his glorious body, according to the mighty working, whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself.”  

 

Why not consider this amendment?  “. . . in the sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal fellowship with God, when Heaven comes to Earth, when the Christian hope is realized, and “God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. . . . His servants will serve him. They will see his face” (Revelation 21:322:3–4). 2 Peter 3:13 (ESV)[5]tells us that the new heaven and new earth will be “where righteousness dwells.” The creation of the new heavens and new earth brings the promise that God “will wipe every tear from their eyes” (Revelation 21:4).[6]

 

The intermediate state is not our final hope. Our hope is found in the Final State, dwelling with God forever and ever on Earth. Like Abraham and Joseph, we temporarily bequeath our remains to the earth, in burial, believing the promise, “I shall return.”




 

Monday, May 1, 2023

My Shepherd Will Supply My Need

This song based on Psalm 23 is "My Shepherd Will Supply My Need" written by Isaac Watts, who wrote many hymns based on the Psalms.

My Shepherd will supply my need;
Jehovah is His Name;
In pastures fresh He makes me feed
Beside the living stream.
He brings my wand’ring spirit back
When I forsake His ways,
And leads me, for His mercy’s sake,
In paths of truth and grace.

When I walk through the shades of death,
Thy presence is my stay;
A word of Thy supporting breath
Drives all my fears away.
Thy hand, in sight of all my foes,
Doth still my table spread;
My cup with blessings overflows;
Thine oil anoints my head.

The sure provisions of my God
Attend me all my days;
O may Thy house be mine abode,
And all my work be praise!
There would I find a settled rest
While others go and come,
No more a stranger or a guest,
But like a child at home.

This is a beautiful rendition:  https://youtu.be/WTalmqydV2w 



Sunday, April 2, 2023

Palm Sunday, and Why the ‘Date’ Is So Significant

Here is an important observation by Karen Engle, author of the blog by the same title posted on Logos Bible Software Blog. [1]   There is a distinct possibly that we miss the full significance of Palm Sunday when we celebrate as the crowd did. 

Passover has been Judaism’s transformative event ever since. It’s celebrated every year on Nisan 15—falling in March or April on our Gregorian calendars. It was on this date Israel left Egypt and passed through the Red Sea—the date God redeemed the Israelites out of slavery. 

On “the tenth day of this month” (Nisan 10, the first month of the Israelite calendar),  each family was to choose a one-year-old lamb “without blemish” (no defect), bring it into their home, and care for it for five days. On Nisan 14, they were to slaughter it just before sundown and put its blood on the lintel and doorposts of their home

 

Six days before Passover puts Jesus in Bethany on Nisan 9 (Nisan 15 minus 6 days). “The next day” would have been Nisan 10—the same “date” the Israelites were to bring “lambs without blemish” into their homes. Almost 1,500 years after the first Passover in Egypt, Jesus entered Jerusalem on a donkey, on Nisan 10.

 

The people missed the full significance of the circumstances. What they didn’t see was God’s selection of Jesus Christ as the final Passover lamb to be slaughtered.”




__________________________________________

1. https://www.logos.com/grow/palm-sunday-and-why-the-date-is-so-significant/

 

Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Against Autonomy

This is an excellent article.  I’m posting it because it is superior and in accord with a post that I wrote entitled: “ We Are People Who Together Form A Community” that you can read HERE.   

Click on the title to read this article:

Against Autonomy