Search This Blog

Thursday, November 21, 2024

What Fellowship Does A Christian Have With A Labour Union?

“Our labor unions are not narrow, self-seeking groups. They have raised wages, shortened hours, and provided supplemental benefits. Through collective bargaining and grievance procedures, they have brought justice and democracy to the shop floor.” - John F. Kennedy, September 5, 1960.

I was a young subaltern arriving at Currie Barracks in 1974. The city was Winnipeg, Manitoba. The unit was the Second Battalion of the famous Princess Patricias Light Infantry (PPCLI). The stated task of an infantry soldier was “to close with and destroy the enemy.” The “enemy” in this case was the Canadian Postal Service and the role of the Battalion was to help get essential mail to the recipients. Not what I expected!

Today, November 20, 2024, fifty years later, The Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) has announced it intends to begin a national strike. Global News reported that “according to the union, its list of demands includes wage increases aligned with inflation, enhancements to group benefits — such as coverage for fertility treatments and gender-affirming care —improved protections against technological changes, more paid medical leave, paid meal and rest periods and short-term disability payments.”[1]

This blog is not about the Postal Worker strike. I lead with this story because it is typical of many labor strikes in Canada. In those last fifty years that I referred to, Canada postal workers have gone on strike 19 times, i.e., about every 3 years. Typical of Canadian strike action, it is executed at the least convenient time for citizens, in this case, approaching the Christmas season. Earlier this year, West Jet threatened strike action as the vacation time approached. This is certainly intentional hoping to win the angst of citizens to support the strike.

Many, like John Kennedy boast of the benefits of of labour unions. I would want to concede that without any argument. Others, like my grandfather who eventually strapped on a German bayonet, a trophy from his service in World War I, and crossed a picket line so that my father and the rest of the family could eat, would take a more discerning view. But this is a blog not a book. This blog is not a comprehensive study of labour unions. This blog serves only one purpose: How should a Christian view participation in a labor union and joining in strike action or other such walkouts and lockouts?

Let me define what I mean by a Christian. A Christian is a follower of Christ. They have repented of their rebellion against God and have sought, by His power, to live for Him. They see themselves as being bought with a price and not their own to do as they want. They wish to please God in all they do and thereby glorify Him. They are indwelt with the Spirit of God and live under the guidance of the Bible, recognizing it is the ultimate, authoritative, sufficient guide for their life and their beliefs. How should that person view their involvement in a labour union?

One presumption that needs to be assumed in this blog is that the existence of labour unions should be treated as amoral. The fact that one is a union member is not considered to be wrong in and of itself. We might even concede the idea that labour unions can be a help to Christians. A union might ensure religious liberty and the like. So, a more refined question is: what types of activities should a Christian support and take part in? To this the Bible is not silent. The Scriptures have a robust theology of work. As I remind the reader of some of the principles of work expressed in Holy Scripture, I suggest that it will form a series of checks and boundaries that are useful to the Christian.

 

1.      God is the author of work. Genesis 2:15 teaches us that work was God’s idea before sin entered the world. The Christian will embrace his or her employment as a good thing, not a thing to be avoided, nor despised, not an enemy. The Christian employee will stand out as one who engages in work with joy and as a mission from God. Work is as much a ministry and a pastor labouring in a local congregation. I will write more on this in Principle 6.

 

2.      Sin made work hard (Genesis 3:17-19). Because of man’s rebellion of God, work is painful and takes “sweat.” If a Christian employee has a distressing day at work, their response initially is not to blame the employer, the system, his or her colleagues, etc., but to remember that the ultimate cause of their sense of frustration (or whatever) is sin. If it is sin, then the Saviour is the answer. Consider this: the proverbial bad-day-at-work drives the Christian employee, not to job action, but to Christ. “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”[2]

 

3.      A Christian does not view his or her boss as the boss (so to speak). Christians “obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ, not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers, but as bondservants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart.”[3]  (See also Colossians 3:22-24) It is interesting that Paul uses the same language for living the Christian life (“fear and trembling”, Philippians 2:12) as how Christians are to work. It is not a paralyzingly fear, but a motivating fear. It is a fear that says, “I don’t want to do anything that brings dishonour on my Saviour.”  But more than that, the Christian employee adopts the attitude that he or she is working for Jesus Christ. They work to the ignoring of who is watching or who is affirming but doing God’s will for His commendation. The logic is profound: if your work pleases God, it will likely please your boss. If your boss is not pleased in your God-pleasing work, then God’s opinion is what really matters.

 

4.      John the Baptist, in Luke 3:14, counselled soldiers to be content with their wages. This will be an incredibly provocative principle. Remember, a Christian believes and looks to obey God’s Word. Note what Paul wrote, “But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content.”[4] Would it not be correct that most union strike actions are motivated by a desire for more wages, more benefits? Are we not fueled with dissatisfaction when we learn that those people over there receive more compensation than we do? Should there not be some internal investigation within the heart of a Christian that examines reality and decides what is legitimate justice or what it is sheer greed?

 

5.      Another question that a Christian should consider about labour unions is the issue of association. “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever?”[5]  When one takes part with a union and he or she feels the necessity to compromise Biblical precepts and principles, they are faced with difficult choices. The Apostolic question is critical, “Is it better to obey God or man?” (Acts 5:29).

 

6.      Finally, and most decisively, how does the Christian employee wrestle with the Apostle Peter’s admonition: “Servants, be subject to your masters with all respect, not only to the good and gentle but also to the unjust. For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly.”[6]  Our good and faithful work will bring accolades and promotion, but our godly submission to unjust employers brings glory to God. It is this factor that will decide who we are working for. It is this factor that will figure out what our genuine ambition is. Jesus commanded His followers to “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations . . ..”[7] Literally the command reads, “As you go make disciples.” It includes “As you go to work, make disciples.” Our vocation is intended by our Saviour to be our mission field. Suffering under difficult and unjust conditions is one way to give glory to God and as Peter will say in that same context of suffering, “always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you.”[8]

 

Jesus wrote a letter to the Church in Thyatira (Revelation 2:18-29) The city was a centre of commerce, and the records preserve references to more trade guilds than those listed for any other Asian city. The necessity for membership in a trade guild invited the Christians of Thyatira to compromise and opened the door to many temptations. Admittedly trade guilds were not labour unions. They were work associations that met for mutual benefit and protection. Paul had them in mind when he penned these words, “All things are lawful,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful,” but not all things build up.”[9]  The fact that the Bible does not forbid Christians joining labour unions does not ratify their choice to join and/or take part in all or any of its activities.

Labour unions often perform their duties based upon adversarial approach to negotiations based on discontent and greed. The goal of work disruption is often to gain personal comfort and ease to the discomfort and ease of other citizens. Undoubtedly labour unions have also addressed issues of justice and true equity. The purpose of this blog was not to “throw the baby out with the wash” but to ask Christians clear Biblical questions. Undoubtedly if a Christian finds themselves compromised with the activities of a union, difficult choices will have to be made. They may also face persecution. But the reason I made certain that I defined what a Christian was is to ensure we understood what it means to be a Christian. Jesus said, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul?”[10]  Jesus said this as He was making His way to Jerusalem — to the cross. If you want to follow Jesus, get in line. Join the band of cross-carriers. Join the fellowship of those hated by culture and heading to the cross. “Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted.”[11]


The place of suffering in service and of passion in mission is hardly ever taught today. But the greatest single secret of evangelistic or missionary effectiveness is the willingness to suffer and die. It may be a death to popularity (by faithfully preaching the unpopular biblical gospel), or to pride (by the use of modest methods in reliance on the Holy Spirit), or to racial and national prejudice (by identification with another culture), or to material comfort (by adopting a simple lifestyle). But the servant must suffer if he is to bring light to the nations, and the seed must die if it is to multiply.”  - John Stott[12]

 

“In the end, whether a Christian should join a labor union is a matter of conscience and sensitivity to the leading of the Lord. If you are convinced God wants you to join the union, then join it. It is a personal decision, not something another believer can place on you. Realize that, if you join a union, you are obligating yourself to function under their rules.”[13] My question to your heart is this: Do their rules contradict or oppose the gracious, holy “rules” of God? That is the sixty-four-million-dollar question.







[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Mt 11:28). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[3] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Eph 6:5–6). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[4] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (1 Ti 6:8–9). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[5] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (2 Co 6:14–15). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[6] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (1 Pe 2:18–20). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[7] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Mt 28:18–19). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[8] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (1 Pe 3:15). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[9] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (1 Co 10:23). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[10] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Mt 16:24–26). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[11] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (2 Ti 3:12). (2016). Crossway Bibles.


Thursday, November 14, 2024

Sentence Diagramming — a Picture of the Text that’s worth a thousand words!

I do not claim to be perfect in any way, nor am I skilled in original languages. But for many years I practiced, albeit imperfectly the discipline of sentence diagramming. By this I sought to carefully considering the relationships between clauses, phrases, and other parts of speech realizing that it is vital to understanding the biblical text. 

Here is an example. I am confident that I have gleaned the main idea and the argument of the text.  I am also confident that without sentence diagramming, I would have ended up at a different point.  I’ve summarized the results in a sermon plan.


 

“To win the favor of the world and its despots 

means to lose the favor of heaven.

To win the favor of heaven 

means to lose the favor of the world.” - Garland

 

Illustration: “Why Jesus requires assistance from Simon is not stated by Luke, who seems more interested in providing a reminder of the implications of Jesus’ faithfulness to God’s purpose for those who want to follow him in discipleship:

9: 23: If any want to become my followers, let them … take up their cross daily and follow me.

14: 27: Whoever does not carry the cross and follow me cannot be my disciple. 23: 26: They laid the cross on him, and made him carry it behind Jesus.”

                        — Joel B. Green


Theme: The Mission of Christ


Main Point: Anyone that wishes to follow Christ must join Him on Mission


The Cost of Following Christ on Mission: To join the ranks of those condemned by the world; a world that is adulterous and sinful.


The following quote was added after I first published this blog:


“The place of suffering in service and of passion in mission is hardly ever taught today. But the greatest single secret of evangelistic or missionary effectiveness is the willingness to suffer and die. It may be a death to popularity (by faithfully preaching the unpopular biblical gospel), or to pride (by the use of modest methods in reliance on the Holy Spirit), or to racial and national prejudice (by identification with another culture), or to material comfort (by adopting a simple lifestyle). But the servant must suffer if he is to bring light to the nations, and the seed must die if it is to multiply.”  - John Stott


http://www.justworshipgod.com/2015/08/12-classic-quotes-from-john-stott-cross.html?m=1





Comments or Helpful Critiques are always welcome





Sunday, November 10, 2024

When Will These Things Be? A Guide to the Olivet Discourse.

 



INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINE – THE OLIVET DISCOURSE[1]

 

The Olivet Discourse is found in Matthew 24–25, Mark 13, and Luke 21. This speech by Jesus is, at minimum, a prophecy against the Jerusalem temple and also, we see here a prophecy of Jesus’s Second Coming as Judge of the world. A faithful interpretation of the speech will honor the timestamps and the intended audience of our Lord indicated by the word “you”.

 

 

 

I

THESE VERSES REFER TO EVENTS THAT ARE TO CHARACTERIZE THE ENTIRE PERIOD FROM A.D. 33 TO A.D. 70, THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE AND THE FALL OF JERUSALEM.

 

Matthew 24:3–14

Mark 13:1-13

Luke 21:10–19

 

II

THESE VERSES REFER TO THE ONE SIGN THAT INDICATES THE PROPHESIED DESTRUCTION IS ABOUT TO OCCUR.

 

Matthew 24:15-28

Mark 13:14-23

Luke 21:20-24

 

III

THIS PERIOD OF UNPRECEDENTED TRIBULATION (A.D. 66–70) INAUGURATES OR INTRODUCES A TIME OF UNDETERMINED LENGTH, DURING WHICH TRIBULATION WILL BE PROMINENT, BUT DURING WHICH ALSO WE ARE ALERTLY TO LOOK FOR THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST. THIS IS THE PRESENT AGE IN WHICH WE LIVE, CALLED BY LUKE “THE TIMES OF THE GENTILES” (LUKE 21:24; CF. ROM. 11:25).

 

Matthew 24:29-31

Mark 13:24-27

Luke 21:25-28

 

 




[1] With help from Storms, Sam. Kingdom Come: The Amillennial Alternative. Christian Focus Publications. Kindle Edition.

 

Saturday, November 9, 2024

Dual Authorship of the Bible

 “Unless the Lord builds the house,

                  those who build it labor in vain.”[1]

Who is building in this familiar Psalm? Is the LORD building? Or are people building?

It was 1983. God moved into my life in transforming power. A neighbor invited me to attend his church. It was not long before the Associate Pastor involved me in a Bible Study that was studying foundational truths of Christianity. The study textbook was written by a Dr. Bruce Milne, entitled Know the Truth: A Handbook of Christian Belief. The very first section was on The Final Authorities in Matters of Faith. It covered topics like authority, revelation, and Scripture. Dr Milne gave several theories of inspiration but the one preferred, he named “supervision.” God “supervised” the chosen men who penned the pages of the Bible. I will discuss that later.

The Biblical authors were not hesitant to claim their own authorship. Therefore, Luke could write, “it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you . . ..”[2]  And we also find in the New Testament that many authors were not ashamed to affirm themselves as authors. For example:

a.    “Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, . . . To all those in Rome.” (Ro 1:1–7).

b.   James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, To the twelve tribes in the  Dispersion:” (Jas 1:1)

c.    “Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who are elect exiles.” (1 Pe 1:1)

d.    “I have written something to the church.” (3 Jn 9)

e.    “Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James, To those who are called.” (Jud 1).

The Doctrine of Inspiration did not make the human authors robotic, nor was it conducted (for the most part) through word-by-word dictation. Through this miracle, God wrote, and man wrote. Thus, the word that Milne uses, i.e., “supervision” is not a bad word. (I struggle to find a better word, yet I might choose the phrase, “providentially ordained.” I.e., working all things in accordance with His will.) He goes on to explain:

“This theory asserts that in the process of giving to us the Scriptures, God sovereignly supervised and ordered the background, heredity and circumstances of the individual writers; as a result, when they recorded events, meditations or sermons in writing, the words used were consciously the free composition of the authors and at the same time the very Word of God.”[3] [Emphasis mine]

So, from the very beginning of my Christian journey, I believed that God used chosen men to write Scripture. I believed their writings were largely their very own composition, yet at the very same time the very Word of God. I accepted this as a mystery, yet a necessary and essential truth. Milne summarizes: “Their inspired words, therefore, are clearly stamped as ‘theirs’ and address their immediate situation but are also in God’s providence part of his eternal Word to his people in every age.”

Much to my surprise, I didn’t realize that some people didn’t believe that. Opponents to the position that I present in this article will agree that man had a role in the production of Scripture, but they would say that the words “did not originate in man.” Although not entirely bowing to a theory of dictation, they would argue that the work of “inspiration” gave to the writers the God-thoughts. In other words, they prefer to refer to these men as recorders of the Bible, not authors. They’re problem is a misunderstanding of the word “inspiration.” The Biblical word “inspiration” does not mean as it does today. Someone might say, “God inspired me to write these lyrics.”  That is not how the Bible speaks of inspiration. Mounce is helpful here:

θεόπνευστος, “God-breathed,” occurs only here in the Greek Bible, being found rarely in pre-Christian literature. It has generally been translated “inspired,” but the niv translation “God-breathed” accurately reflects the etymology of the compound word (θεόÏ‚, “God” + πνειν [aorist *πνευ (Ï‚)-], “to breathe” + verbal adjectival ending-τος) and its meaning as asserting the divine origin of Scripture. It denotes not the manner of the inspiration of Scripture but rather its source.[4]  [Emphasis mine]

We could paraphrase 2 Timothy 3:16 accurately by rendering it: “All Scripture is sourced in God.” Of course, the position of this paper affirms that. Paul is not teaching “how” the transmission of Scripture takes place in 2 Timothy 3:16. Likewise, the ESV Study Bible comments: “The term stresses the divine origin and thus the authority of Scripture. Paul does not point to the human authors of Scripture as inspired people but says that the writings themselves (“Scripture,” Gk. graphÄ“, “writing,” which in the NT always refers to biblical writings) are the words spoken (“breathed out”) by God.”[5]

But but the reader will say, “That is fine, but what about 2 Peter 1:21, “For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” Surely this passage will confirm that Biblical authors simply wrote what God moved them to write. It was not original to them. I respond by calling us to a careful reading of the text.

a.   The subject (v.16) is the making known to the reader, the power and coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. In short Peter is writing about the Second Coming of Christ.

b.   Peter uses the Transfiguration as a prelude or anticipation of this Return (ESV Study Bible).

c.   The Return of Christ is certain, even as it was certain that Peter experienced the glory of Christ on Mount Transfiguration. Yet the prophetic truths about Christ and His return are more certain than Peter’s experience.

d.   Peter affirms Old Testament prophecies about Christ’s return by his statement in v.21.

e.   Peter is assuring that all the Scriptural prophecies about Christ’s return were not produced by someone’s personal notions but in fact were given to them by the Holy Spirit.

We note then that 2 Peter 1:21 is not a general statement on the authorship of Scripture. It is affirming that no human being of their own origin or volition could predict the Coming of the Lord. Those prophecies could only exist because of the pheromenoi of the Spirit — bringing, bearing work of the Spirit on the human author. So, back to my argument. The text of the Bible is for the most part[6] “wholly” belonging to the human author and “wholly belonging to God.”[7]

This mystical dynamic that occurs in the creation of holy Scriptures is not unlike the mystical union between the two natures of Christ. It is well known that for much of the first three hundred years of Church history, believers were engrossed in shaping and describing this Union of Christ, correcting and refuting error. The tendency was to make one Nature of Christ superior to the other or misrepresent one of the natures. The same can be true about the mystical authorship of the Bible. There will be those who make too much of the human effort and those who make too little of it by overshadowing it with Divine authorship. Warfield, I think strikes the balance that is needed (Notice the sounds of Nicene in this quote.):

“The human and divine factors in inspiration are conceived of as flowing confluently and harmoniously to the production of a common product. And the two elements are conceived of in the Scriptures as the inseparable constituents of one single and uncompounded product. Of every word of Scripture is it to be affirmed, in turn, that it is God's word and that it is man's word. All the qualities of divinity and of humanity are to be sought and may be found in every portion and element of the Scripture. While, on the other hand, no quality inconsistent with either divinity or humanity can be found in any portion or element of Scripture.”[8]

Warfield constrains us to think this through carefully. There is nothing contrarian or inconsistent with the Human/Divine authorship reality. They are distinct yet inseparable. Every word originates from both and can be found throughout Scripture. They are at no time inconsistent with each other. This is profound. The well-known theologian A.H. Strong will affirm that you can never look at Scripture, anywhere as “merely human” or “merely divine.”[9]   Strong will then make this provocative statement: “Inspiration, therefore, did not remove, but rather pressed into its own service, all the personal peculiarities of the writers, together with their defects of culture and literary style.”[10]  Grudem expands,

“In cases where the ordinary human personality and writing style of the author were prominently involved, as seems the case with the major part of Scripture, all that we are able to say is that God’s providential oversight and direction of the life of each author was such that their personalities, their backgrounds and training, their abilities to evaluate events in the world around them, their access to historical data, their judgment with regard to the accuracy of information, and their individual circumstances when they wrote, were all exactly what God wanted them to be, so that when they actually came to the point of putting pen to paper, the words were fully their own words but also fully the words that God wanted them to write, words that God would also claim as his own.”[11] [Emphasis mine]

Charles Hodge builds on that when he writes, “Moreover, as inspiration did not involve the suspension or suppression of the human faculties, so neither did it interfere with the free exercise of the distinctive mental characteristics of the individual. If a Hebrew was inspired, he spake Hebrew; if a Greek, he spake Greek; if an educated man, he spoke as a man of culture; if uneducated, he spoke as such a man is wont to speak. If his mind was logical, he reasoned, as Paul did; if emotional and contemplative, he wrote as John wrote. All this is involved in the fact that God uses his instruments according to their nature. The sacred writers impressed their peculiarities on their several productions as plainly as though they were the subjects of no extraordinary influence.”[12]

God yet used and providentially superintended every aspect of the human authorship with Divine purpose. They were authors of literature such that their personalities, culture, language, abilities were all incorporated so that their authorship was a true reality. I even will go as far as to say along with Lewis: “There is a . . . sense in which the Bible, since it is after all literature, cannot properly be read except as literature; and the different parts of it as the different sorts of literature they are.”[13]

Because the Bible is given to us by Human/Divine authorship and we are careful not to deny the human part, we therefore realize that if we do not read the Bible as literature, we will not understand God’s inspired Word. To be clear, the human author, the historical and cultural context, the genre, the language, the sentence structure, the syntax, the flow of thought, and so on, all contribute to proper interpretation and understanding. To dismiss the literary structure of the Biblical authors will in the end mar the truth of Divine authorship. The Bible teaches that it is directly and sovereignly inspired by God and is therefore to be submitted to in how He has inspired it. “If we acknowledge its authority, we must bow to it at this point too: in its dual claim that it is God’s inspired Word and that we should approach it with reverence and submission. To take another view is to stand in opposition to clear biblical teaching.[14]  [Emphasis mine]

The Bible student, the preacher, the teacher, the author, will then carefully engage with the human author, looking to understand his personality, the cultural, historical context that he is writing in and his own purpose for composing his literature. His grammar, his style, his sentence structure, his flow of logic and so on become essential to the interpreter. At the same time, this student will recognize that the human author is not ever inconsistent with other authors, that what he writes is free from error and he carries the very words of God in all their authority, sufficiency, and power.




[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Ps 127:1). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Lk 1:3). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[3] Milne, Bruce, Know the Truth, InterVarsity Press, 2012

[4] Mounce, W. D. (2000). Pastoral Epistles (Vol. 46, pp. 565–566). Word, Incorporated.

[5] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 2342). Crossway Bibles.

[6] I write “for the most part” because in some cases, God Himself to the author to write something, e.g., Moses in Exodus, or John in Revelation. These examples are few. Most of Scripture comes from the human author and Divine author.

[7] Frame, J. M. (2006). Salvation belongs to the Lord: an introduction to systematic theology (p. 66). P&R Publishing.

[9] Strong, A. H. (1907). Systematic theology (p. 212-213). American Baptist Publication Society.

[10] Ibid,

[11] Grudem, W. A. (2004). Systematic theology: an introduction to biblical doctrine (p. 81). Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House.

[12] Hodge, C. (1997). Systematic theology (Vol. 1, p. 157). Logos Research Systems, Inc.

[13] https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/resources/c-s-lewis-on-holy-scripture/

[14] Milne, Bruce, Know the Truth, InterVarsity Press, 2012