Search This Blog

Monday, May 17, 2021

Discussion on Marriage and Divorce – Part 3

What is the Exception Clause? What Does Πορνείᾳ Mean?

As stated previously there are those that interpret porneia as an “unlawful marriage”.  In other words a couple marries and they find that they are too closely related.  Another view is that porneia refers to a situation where Joseph finds himself with Mary during the betrothal period.  This is called the betrothal view. But these views are difficult to defend and the truth is that porneia embraces a much larger scope as Dr. D.A. Carson writes:

“But it must be admitted that the word porneia itself is very broad. In unambiguous contexts it can on occasion refer to a specific kind of sexual sin. Yet even then this is possible only because the specific sexual sin belongs to the larger category of sexual immorality. Porneia covers the entire range of such sins (cf. TDNT, 6:579-95; BAGD, s.v.; Joseph Jensen, "Does porneia Mean Fornication? A Critique of Bruce Malina," NovTest 20 [1978]: 161-84) and should not be restricted unless the context requires it.”[1]

Translation Comparison

 

And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.” (Matthew 19:9, KJV 1900)

And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”” (Matthew 19:9, ESV)

 

I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”” (Matthew 19:9, NIV)

 

 

Greek Interlinear

 

Matthew 19:9 (SBLGNT)

 

9 λέγω     δὲ   ὑμῖν     ὅτι        ὃς     ἂν    ἀπολύσῃ       τὴν γυναῖκα   αὐτοῦ  μὴ ἐπὶ          πορνείᾳ

And I say      to you, that whoever     shall put away his      wife                   not for      ____?______

 

καὶ           γαμήσῃ          ἄλλην             μοιχᾶται                καὶ     ἀπολελυμένην

and    shall     marry    another      commits adultery     And he who her put away

 

γαμήσας        μοιχᾶται.

marries    commits adultery[2]

 Strong’s Concordance interprets “πορνεία porneia; from 4203; fornication:—fornication(4), fornications(2), immoralities(1), immorality(16), sexual immorality(1), unchastity(1).”[3]

Vines interprets1. porneia (πορνεία, 4202) is used (a) of “illicit sexual intercourse,” in John 8:41; Acts 15:20, 29; 21:25; 1 Cor. 5:1; 6:13, 18; 2 Cor. 12:21; Gal. 5:19; Eph. 5:3; Col. 3:5; 1 Thess. 4:3; Rev. 2:21; 9:21; in the plural in 1 Cor. 7:2; in Matt. 5:32 and 19:9 it stands for, or includes, adultery; it is distinguished from it in 15:19 and Mark 7:21; (b) metaphorically, of “the association of pagan idolatry with doctrines of, and professed adherence to, the Christian faith,” Rev. 14:8; 17:2, 4; 18:3; 19:2; some suggest this as the sense in 2:21.”[4]

Bill Mounce translates porneia: “sexual immorality, fornication, marital unfaithfulness, prostitution, adultery, a generic term for sexual sin of any kind.”[5]

Conclusion

But porneia had a broader range of meaning in ordinary usage, referring to any sexual intercourse that was contrary to the moral standards of Scripture, and nothing in this context would indicate that this should be understood in such a restricted sense.”[6]

 Therefore it just isn't good scholarship to limit the exception clause to something particular like incest or unfaithfulness during the betrothal.  Pornea has the potential to invoke a divorce and any sexual perversion and marital unfaithfulness.

 




[1] Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Matthew/Exposition of Matthew/VI. Opposition and Eschatology: The Triumph of Grace (19:3-26:5)/A. Narrative (19:3-23:39)/1. Marriage and divorce (19:3-12), Book Version: 4.0.2

 [2]Newberry, T., & Berry, G. R. (2004). The interlinear literal translation of the Greek New Testament (Mt 19:9). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

[3] Thomas, R. L. (1998). New American Standard Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek dictionaries : updated edition. Anaheim: Foundation Publications, Inc.

[4] Vine, W. E., Unger, M. F., & White, W., Jr. (1996). Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words (Vol. 2, p. 252). Nashville, TN: T. Nelson.

[5] https://www.billmounce.com/greek-dictionary/porneia

[6] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 1861). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Sunday, May 16, 2021

Discussion on Marriage and Divorce – Part 2

The position that I described in Part 1, the previous article is a typical response to divorce and re-marriage offering that can best be described ‘No Divorce, No Re-marriage”.  This Discussion moves into that article and examines its credibility.  At times, this position can be described as the traditional orthodox position.  Therefore we start by examining that claim.

“A look at the early Church and the patristic fathers garner no absolute concession of understand. Not all have interpreted these passages in like manner. Indeed, some have come virtually to opposite conclusions. Because they were writing largely for men, most of their remarks and illustrations concern women at fault. Generally, however, either directly or by allusion, they agree that what applies to one sex applies equally to the other.”


“The Ante-Nicene Fathers generally permitted divorce on the ground of adultery. Some even required it. At the same time, remarriage was usually forbidden. Not only did it cut off any chance of marital reconciliation, but many in the church regarded marriage as an indissoluble bond which continued unbroken until the death of one spouse.”[1] 

Augustine who strongly influenced the Roman Catholic Church wrote, in part, “Neither can it rightly be held that a husband who dismisses his wife because of fornication and marries another does not commit adultery [himself] . . . Therefore, when we say: ‘Whoever marries a woman dismissed by her husband for the reason other than fornication commits adultery’, undoubtedly we speak the truth.[2] 

Notably “like Luther, Calvin saw adultery as the one cause for divorce in Jesus' teachings. As far as he was concerned, the OT penalty for adultery should be enforced, making divorce unnecessary, but "the wicked forbearance of magistrates makes it necessary for husbands to put away unchaste wives, because adulterers are not punished." “Divorce under such circumstances gives the innocent party freedom to remarry, for Jesus' condemnation of remarriage as adultery applied undoubtedly only to "unlawful and frivolous divorces."[3]

 So it seems that the Reformers in their study of the matter, primarily to dismiss the sacramental nature of marriage also brought a change of view that permitted remarriage by an innocent party after a divorce because of adultery or desertion.  This is represented in the Westminster Confession of Faith.


Chapter XXIV. OF MARRIAGE, AND DIVORCE

“V. Adultery or fornication committed after a contract, being detected before marriage, giveth just occasion to the innocent party to dissolve that contract, (Mat 1:18-20). In the case of adultery after marriage, it is lawful for the innocent party to sue out a divorce, (Mat 5:31-32): and, after the divorce, to marry another, as if the offending party were dead, (Mat 19:9; Rom 7:2-3).

I find two very compelling thoughts from the very brief sketch of history

1. The Church always recognized that as long as repentance and reconciliation is possible that remarriage should not be permitted.

2. As history progressed the permanence of marriage never lost its necessity, and no divorce was conceivable unless there had been adultery.  The view of such is that it brought a type of “death” to the relationship saving the parties from certain charges of adultery.

To suggest the view No Divorce, No Re-marriage is and has been the position of the early and historical Church is simply not correct. 

 





[1] https://theologicalstudies.org.uk/article_divorce_snuth.html

[2] https://erickybarra.org/2019/08/04/divorce-remarriage-in-the-church-fathers/

[3] https://theologicalstudies.org.uk/article_divorce_snuth.html

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Discussion on Marriage and Divorce - Part 1

One Position

General

The position that I am describing is the position that was long held by the Church.  It does not describe the liberty and the conciliation of modern positions on the topic.  Although this position is hard to communicate to hurting people, it must be understood it claims to be the posture of Scripture.  At the outset it is important to understand that God forgives all sin. “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” (Matthew 12:31, ESV). Forgiveness and grace are available for the sins of divorce and remarriage.  However the consequence of such sins may limit a person in certain ministries (e.g., “Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife . . ..”[1] )

The Overarching Principle

There is a governing principle in Scripture that gives insight to all less-clear passages.  And this second thing you do. You cover the Lord’s altar with tears, with weeping and groaning because he no longer regards the offering or accepts it with favor from your hand. But you say, “Why does he not?” Because the Lord was witness between you and the wife of your youth, to whom you have been faithless, though she is your companion and your wife by covenant. Did he not make them one, with a portion of the Spirit in their union? And what was the one God seeking? Godly offspring. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and let none of you be faithless to the wife of your youth. “For the man who does not love his wife but divorces her, says the Lord, the God of Israel, covers his garment with violence[2], says the Lord of hosts. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and do not be faithless.”” (Malachi 2:13–16, ESV)

Genesis 2:21-24 describes the reality that God created marriage and Jesus says that God created marriage for permanence.  We read in Matthew 19:4–6 (ESV)

4 He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” [Emphasis mine]

So the overarching principle in the Bible is that marriage is indissoluble.  But there is one exception.

The Exception Clause

Modern writers will take us to Matthew 5:32 and Matthew 19:9, but I intend to show that these are not exception clauses in the sense they are using them.  The exception clause is really found in Romans 7:2–3 (ESV),

2 For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage. 3 Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress.”

Summary

The Biblical position is clear: marriage is God’s design; it is a permanent relationship until death.   This is the posture that interprets all other passages of some dispute.

Disputed Passages

The most disputed passage that some people go to in order to permit divorce is found in Matthew 19:9 (ESV),  And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”  The ESV translates the word πορνεία (porneia) sexual immorality, as do most other translations.  The KJV translates it fornication.  The word is only used in one another place in that form and that is found in 1 Corinthians 5:1 (ESV), “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality [πορνεία] among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife.”  That porneia is clearly incest.  Leviticus 18:6-18 describes this prohibition. Jesus is clearly affirming this.  In other words if a marriage occurs and it is learned that it is an unlawful marriage (the partners are too closely related) then the marriage is annulled.  To give liberty to any sexual misconduct, including adultery, is to move outside the specificity of the text.

Some also give liberty to a believing spouse divorcing an unbelieving spouse if the unbeliever leaves.  If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him . . . But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace.” (1 Corinthians 7:13–15, ESV).  The KJV says the person is not under bondage and the NIV translates it “not bound”.  Some interpret this to mean that the bonds of the marriage contract can be broken.  However there is no permission granted for divorce and remarriage here.  This simply frees the believer from the constant, wearying pursuit of their partner. But it does not sanction divorce or remarriage.

Another common argument that is especially used to permit remarriage is found in Deuteronomy 24. 

“When a man takes a wife and marries her, if then she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, and she departs out of his house, and if she goes and becomes another man’s wife, and the latter man hates her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter man dies, who took her to be his wife, then her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before the Lord. And you shall not bring sin upon the land that the Lord your God is giving you for an inheritance.” (Deuteronomy 24:1–4, ESV)

Rather than give a tacit permission for divorce and remarriage, this passage protects the woman from exploitation by her first husband (requiring two or more dowries).  More importantly if a woman was divorced and married another man, she could not return and marry her first husband. When that union was broken by another marriage, adultery was committed. Jesus supports this interpretation when He says, But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” (Matthew 5:32, ESV). Even if she remarried her former husband, adultery was committed because the original union was broken.

Another passage often used to substantiate divorce is drawn from Ezra.  When he learned that the priests had married foreign wives, we read: And Ezra the priest stood up and said to them, “You have broken faith and married foreign women, and so increased the guilt of Israel. Now then make confession to the Lord, the God of your fathers and do his will. Separate yourselves from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives.”” (Ezra 10:10–11, ESV).

Some people take that command “separate yourselves” to mean divorce. The Hebrew word is   בָּדַל “badal” which means to separate and can mean “make a distinction”.   It is likely that these wives were to dwell separately unless, perhaps, they came to know the God of Israel.  Ezra did not want their foreign gods to be in the homes of the Israelites.

Conclusion

Marriage is a lifetime covenant until death.  There is no permission in the Scriptures for divorce or remarriage.  Jesus said that “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.” (Matthew 19:8, ESV), but He gave no such allowance. Only a hard-hearted, sinful person would ever initiate divorce.






[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Ti 3:2). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[2] Probable meaning (compare Septuagint and Deuteronomy 24:1–4); or “The Lord, the God of Israel, says that he hates divorce, and him who covers

Saturday, May 8, 2021

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 5

Previous articles can be read here:

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 1

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 2

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 3

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 4

Eκκλησία (ekklēsia) is the Greek word translated ‘Church’ in the New Testament. In the New Testament it was a gathering of citizens called out of sin and darkness; and called out from their private, individual lives into gatherings found in a home and eventually into some public place, an assembly. Since it was an outward, visible assembly it could only be local.  

I have argued that the New Testament primarily refers to the Church as local and visible.  I showed that it is described in Revelation 1:12ff as autonomous under the Lordship of Christ. In Part 1 I described a conversation:

“So my brother, you have been attending this Church, for some time.  Have you considered membership,” I ask.  “No, I actually find it unnecessary,” he responds.  Continuing, he states, “When I became a Christian I became part of the universal Body of Christ.  Joining a Church is redundant and unnecessary; besides institutional churches are just man-made organizations.” 

This Doctrine of the Local, Visible Church demands certain implications.  From the conversation above, the first is obvious.

Implication #1. It is foreign to the New Testament and inconsistent to profess faith in Christ and not become a member of a local Church.  It is illogical to claim membership solely in what is scattered and unseen wherein Christ has determined that the local Church makes visible what is indistinguishable.

To those who remain within the numinous unobserved domain of Christendom and not join the local church, the question is laid before you, “Which pastor is charged with the watch-keep over your soul; and which pastor do you grant your respect and obedience (Hebrews 13:17)?”  We could add, “To which body of believers will you show your mutual love and care for?”  Or do you find it more pleasing to float between these embassies of heaven and pick and choose what you want, discarding what you don’t want.

And if one is unconvinced of the Biblical necessity to become a member of a local Church, then to which Church will you seek to affirm your profession of faith and in obedience to our Lord baptize you?   And to which local Church will you partake of the Lord’s Table, confessing your oneness with that Body and yet refuse to commit to it through membership? 

Implication #2.  As we have affirmed the Truth that local, visible Bodies of Christ, called the Church are ordained and sovereignly ruled by our risen Saviour.  And as one readily sees that Pastors, elders and deacons are delegated responsibility to care and watch over these individual outposts of Heaven, we then must readily assume, not only that each Church is independent and self-governing under Christ, but that each assembly will differ in emphasis and matters of conscience.

Certainly cardinal matters of doctrine and faith will be the same no matter the locale of the Church, if it’s a true Church.  In lower tier areas will differ.  This brings me to the specifics of this implication, which is: it ought to be a very serious contravention of a major doctrine that would cause a Church member to break fellowship with their local Church.  To break fellowship over superficial or disputable matters fails to comprehend the uniqueness and the value of the local Church.  When Paul calls Christians to remain loyal, welcoming and in fellowship with other believers who differ on disputable matters, certainly the same must be true of the Church body (Romans 14).

In years past Ruth’s statement to her mother-in-law was often quoted at weddings. “But Ruth said, “Do not urge me to leave you or to return from following you. For where you go I will go, and where you lodge I will lodge. Your people shall be my people, and your God my God. Where you die I will die, and there will I be buried. May the Lord do so to me and more also if anything but death parts me from you.”” (Ruth 1:16–17, ESV).  Would it be that Christians would express the same loyalty to one another in the Church? 

These two implications can be summarized in two words: loyal partnership. 

“An examination of the 118 uses of the word ekklesia in the New Testament scriptures shows they refer directly to a local, visible assembly, ie., a group of people coming together to carry out the Lord's work in a specific location in Ephesus, Colossi, Philippi, or meeting in a house such as Philemon. Only Matthew 16:18 refers to the generic or institutional sense of the church all others refer to or were written to a local assembly.”[1]

There’s a somewhat super spirituality and feigned piety to those who show contempt toward the local church in favour of the “true, invisible, universal” Church. God created the world including mankind to show forth His unseen glory and make it visible, to be seen and rejoiced in.  The invisible God would, in the progress of time, become visible in the Person of Jesus Christ.  In the Person of Christ, God dwelt in all fullness, bodily.  God ordained that the universal, invisible Church become visible that in Ephesus, Colossi, and your community and mine, a visible Church might show forth His glory through the Lordship of Christ and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

It is a Bride, you can kiss.  It is real, tangible and observable. The Groom’s goal is to “present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.”[2]



[1] https://www.facebook.com/notes/baptist-history-preservation/five-reasons-the-church-is-local-and-visible-and-cannot-be-universal-nor-invisib/1880821965309747/

[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Eph 5:27). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 4

In the previous article I asked you not to miss the glory and the simplicity of visible Church revealed to us in Revelation 1. Christ walks among the churches as Lord and risen Savior. Here on planet earth, in time and space, our Redeemer and Master glorifies the Churches.  As He once tabernacle among the people of the 1st Century, now the risen King tabernacles among His local visible Churches.

The New Testament is not silent about the glory of the visible, local Church.  Notice how the Scripture attributes such grandeur to this so-called institution that often is denigrated and dismissed.

  1. Each local Church was obtained by God with His own blood (Paul addressing the elders of Ephesus in Acts 20:28)
  2. Each local Church is self-governing under the lordship of Jesus Christ, regulated by His Word, who walks between the churches (Revelation 1:12ff).  Christ holds the “messengers” to each Church in His right hand (Revelation 1:16).    
  3. Each local Church is indwelt by the Third Person of the Trinity making it the Temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 3:16-17) and there are serious consequences to anyone who does violence to this Temple.
  4. Each local Church is set apart wholly in Christ (1 Corinthians 1:2).
  5. Each local Church is to be led by under-shepherds: Elders and Deacons (Philippians 1:1) who will give account to for the souls of its Members (Hebrews 13:17) and whose members are to show obedience and submission.
  6. Each local Church is to be guarded and cared for by its under-shepherds (Acts 20:28-31).
  7. Each local Church is comprised of Members from every class and culture; male and female (Galatians 3:28) who are all equal and one in Christ.
  8. Each local Church is responsible for what is taught in the Church (e.g., Galatians 1:6; 3:1) and is responsible for the discipline of sinning members (Matthew 18:15ff).
  9. Each local Church Member is responsible for the ministry needs of one another (see the 59 “one another’s” in the New Testament.) such that each member is growing in their faith and increasingly loving one another (2 Thessalonians 1:3).
  10. Each local Church is an outpost/embassy of Heaven here on earth (i.e., Philippians 1:27).
  11. Each local Church is identified as 1) One Body, 2) One Spirit, 3) One Hope, 4) One Lord, 5) One faith, 6) One baptism and 7) One God and Father. (Ephesians 4:1ff).
  12. Each local Church is to be examples of imitating Christ and following the Apostolic doctrine with joy in the Holy Spirit (1 Thessalonians 1:6). 
  13. The local Church is the “a pillar and buttress of the truth.” (1 Timothy 3:15, ESV), charged with promoting and protecting the Truth.

Each one of these characteristics and responsibilities is applied to the local Church. Chuck Colson wrote, “The life function of [the local church] is to love the God who created it - to care for others out of obedience to Christ, to heal those who hurt, to take away fear, to restore community, to belong to one another, to proclaim the Good News while living it out. The church is the invisible made visible.

With God’s help, let us consider some implications to this in the next article.

 

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 1

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 2

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 3

 

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 3

Imagine the scene in “every place “(1 Corinthians 1:2) where the saints of God “call upon the name of the Lord”.  Gazing out the window in my Church, thirty minutes before the hour of worship, there’s a steadily increasing number of vehicles finding a parking place and a steadily increasing number of people entering the “brick and mortar”.  At the hour of worship, when the Call to Worship is given, imagine each and every worshipper thinking: “We are the Temple of the Holy Spirit”.  As we are gathered we are God’s Temple, God’s ναός (pronounced naos), God’s sanctuary.  The dwelling place of God is with us!  How would that singular thought impact the next 90 minutes?  This place, this “brick and mortar” structure, has, because of the gathering of God’s called out ones, become a “heavenly outpost” an image of the celestial Eden.

John saw this sight in its glory and it’s recorded for us in Revelation 1:12–16 (ESV)

12 Then I turned to see the voice that was speaking to me, and on turning I saw seven golden lampstands, 13 and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, clothed with a long robe and with a golden sash around his chest. 14 The hairs of his head were white, like white wool, like snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, 15 his feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace, and his voice was like the roar of many waters. 16 In his right hand he held seven stars, from his mouth came a sharp two-edged sword, and his face was like the sun shining in full strength.

The Holy Spirit helps us interpret this vision. “As for the mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand, and the seven golden lampstands, the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches.” (Revelation 1:20, ESV)

This passage deserves more than a glancing interpretation, but for brevity I quote MacArthur who sums it up so well, “Each lampstand represented a church (v. 20), from which the light of life shone. Throughout Scripture, 7 is the number of completeness, so these 7 lampstands are representative of all the churches.”[1] Here we have represented local, visible Churches, not the “invisible, universal, and mystical” Church.  Here are ordinary believers from known geographic locations.  “Both the congregations and their spiritual leaders are symbolized as light-bearing bodies. Both the congregations and their leaders are of special concern for the risen Lord. He will protect his people in spite of all evil that comes their way.”[2]

Don’t miss the glory and the simplicity of the picture: individual local, visible Churches gathered together under divinely appointed leaders[3] who exist in the palm of the risen Savior.  And don’t miss the scene that exists amid the Churches.  “Christ walks among the churches as Lord and Shepherd (v. 13), just as God’s cloud of glory descended to dwell in the tabernacle and the temple, which had their lampstands (Ex. 25:31–40; 1 Kin. 7:49).”[4]

He, moving graciously among the individual churches is this risen Lord exercising His rightful authority over the congregations (See Revelation 2-3). The very fact that the next two chapters include messages to these local, visible Churches, commending and correcting them individually forces us to conclude that delegated authority and local autonomy are necessary attributes of the local Church.

I find Jonathan Leeman very helpful.  I quote:

Yet a Christian’s heavenly membership in the universal church needs to show up on earth, just like a Christian’s imputed righteousness in Christ should show up in works of righteousness (James 2:14-26) . . . In other words, our membership in Christ’s universal and heavenly body cannot remain an abstract idea. If it is real, it will show up on earth—in real time and space with real people . . . Membership in the universal church must become visible in a local gathering of Christians.[5]

The schema of the New Testament starts with the foundational Gospel accounts that provide for us the life, ministry and teaching of Christ. How the Gospel gets fleshed out is found in the Acts of the Apostles.  It is there that universal ideas, such as, “I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”,[6] the Holy Spirit makes visible through church planting.  The task of the Epistles will be to give correction and direction to these visible churches throughout the known world, “in every place”.  It seems logical that if one is to deny the glory and significance of the local Church in deference to the universal, mystical Body of Christ, he or she must disregard most of our New Testament. God forbid.

In the next article I want us to examine the magnificent and majestic attributes of the local, visible Church “in every place”.

 

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 1

THE BRIDE YOU CAN KISS – Part 2

 



[1] MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 1993). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.

[2] Easley, K. H. (1998). Revelation (Vol. 12, p. 21). Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

[3] There is a good argument that these representatives may be angels, not human pastors. 

[4] Whitlock, L. G., Sproul, R. C., Waltke, B. K., & Silva, M. (1995). The Reformation study Bible: bringing the light of the Reformation to Scripture: New King James Version (Re 1:12). Nashville: T. Nelson.

[5] https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/the-church-universal-and-local/

[6] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Mt 16:18). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.