Search This Blog

Thursday, December 10, 2020

The Perfect Wisdom of Our God

 Lyrics

The perfect wisdom of our God,
Revealed in all the universe:
All things created by His hand,
And held together at His command.
He knows the mysteries of the seas,
The secrets of the stars are His;
He guides the planets on their way,
And turns the earth through another day.
The matchless wisdom of His ways,
That mark the path of righteousness;
His word a lamp unto my feet,
His Spirit teaching and guiding me.
And oh, the mystery of the cross,
That God should suffer for the lost
So that the fool might shame the wise,
And all the glory might go to Christ!
Oh grant me wisdom from above,
To pray for peace and cling to love,
And teach me humbly to receive
The sun and rain of Your sovereignty.
Each strand of sorrow has a place
Within this tapestry of grace;
So through the trials I choose to say:



Songwriters: Getty Julian Keith / Getty Keith / Getty Julian Keith / Getty Keith
The Perfect Wisdom Of Our God lyrics © Thank You Music Ltd., Emi Christian Music Pub Obo Thankyou Music

" I Did Reluctantly Choose to Sing"

"Robert died of a disease that ravaged his body and his mind. I have Rachel’s permission to share with you parts of her letter. Two or three details have been altered to mask her identity, but the words are all hers, very lightly edited to ensure coherence. At this point in her letter she is talking about singing along, with her children, the songs live-streamed from her church:

    These songs are moving to me, especially “The Perfect Wisdom of Our God.” I picked it for Robert’s funeral because of the last verse:

           Each strand of sorrow has a place

           Within this tapestry of grace.

           So through the trials I choose to say,

           “Your perfect will in your perfect way.”

    As Robert was losing his health and his mind, I had about five big reasons why this did not seem remotely perfect. I can remember saying to Robert’s co-pastor that I was choking on the words. But at my lowest point I did reluctantly and sulkily choose to sing them. The significant thing wasn’t whether or not I was sulky. The significant thing was that I did actually sing them, declaring my faith in God and his big picture—my faith in him.…

    In terms of “moral goodness” (if there is such a thing), I think I’m pretty average. Or maybe I’m being generous to myself: I’m prone to being too carefree and selfish, given to extremes and self-indulgence. But I am often able to show commitment and kindness and integrity. So yeah, average, really, on crude terms.

    But I do feel marked out. I am marked out! And I’m convinced that what marks me out is where I choose to put my faith.

    That’s all!

    I believe myself to be constantly and undeservedly blessed, disproportionately upheld and provided for, unexpectedly finding myself surrounded by joy, peace, hope, love, wonderful people and uplifting children. My life has been rescued and redeemed over and over again despite my relentless failures and flaws. I have a genuine sense of “Why me?” in a good way.

    “Your perfect will in your perfect way”: I know where to place my faith. That’s my privilege. That’s the gift given me. I have been known to meander and drift and goof up in both trivial and profound ways, but in the end I always come back to the right place, to the right person—the only person. Brother, Friend, Redeemer, Deliverer, King, Lord, Bridegroom, Father, Savior, Creator. I have been able to trust God with my “strands of sorrow.” I am under his wings and always will be.

    That’s all!

    In a way, it’s so unfair that I should be able to recognize Jesus for who he is when so many other people whom I respect and love don’t seem to either want to or be able to. I hear his voice and I just know he’s the Good Shepherd. To me, it’s a no-brainer. Faith is a gift, but it’s a free gift, and there are no exams to pass or morality assessments.

    Our “strands of sorrow” are only a millimeter long on the rope disappearing off into the horizon where Robert invested his life. He taught and lived and died this “perfect wisdom.” [1]


__________________________________________________________

1. Carson, D. A. (2020). I’m so Grateful that I’m among the Elect. Themelios, 45(3), 484–485.

Mountains That Bind Biblical Revelation Together

Biblical Theology is almost a new study to me.  The impact of key proponents over the last year has brought it's relevance to light.  What is Biblical Theology?  

Steve Wellum says that biblical theology “contends that to read the Bible as unified Scripture is not just one interpretive option among others, but that which best corresponds to the nature of the text itself, given its divine inspiration. As such, [biblical theology], as a discipline, not only provides the basis for understanding how texts in one part of Scripture relate to all other texts, but it also serves as the basis and underpinning for all theologizing. . . . ” [1]

Tom Schreiner has summarized, biblical theology “asks what themes are central to the biblical writers in their historical context, and attempts to discern the coherence of such themes.”[2]

In a recent read, I came across another example of the tapestry of Scripture woven together in a theme.  This theme is mountains.

“If you read the Bible carefully, you will quickly note that mountains play an important role in God’s revelation. It is often the case that crucial redemptive events occur at mountains. For example, in the Old Testament, the garden of Eden is described as a mountain (Ezek. 28:13–15) and Abraham’s effort to sacrifice Isaac and God’s provision of a sacrifice occurred at a mountain (Gen. 22:1–14). The New Testament continues to exhibit this “mountain motif” as Jesus resisted Satan’s temptation on a mountain (Matt. 4:8; Luke 4:5), delivered his great sermon on a mountain (Matt. 5:1; Mark 3:13), pronounced his Great Commission from a mountain (Matt. 28:16), and later, after his death and resurrection, ascended into heaven from the Mount of Olives (Acts 1:10–12). Mountains play a significant role in God’s revelation of himself and the unfolding plan of redemption.” [3]

 

________________________________

1.  https://www.crossway.org/articles/3-ways-to-define-biblical-theology/

2. https://www.crossway.org/articles/3-ways-to-define-biblical-theology/

3. The Gospel According to Moses, Anthony T. Selvaggio, Page 28

From the series: 

THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO THE OLD TESTAMENT

A series of studies on the lives of Old Testament characters, written for laypeople and pastors, and designed to encourage Christ-centered reading, teaching, and preaching of the Old Testament

IAIN M. DUGUID

Series Editor

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

The Sayings of the Wise - Part 26

 

There are no valid excuses for standing idle when it is possible to help. 

Inactivity is complicity. 

Proverbs 24:11–12 is a staggering couplet.  This 25th Saying is a sobering and threatening proverb.  There are two imperatives: One is to “hold back” and the other is to “rescue”.  It’s a Hebrew word translated “rescue” can also be translated “pull out” or save.  

11 Rescue those who are being taken away to death; hold back those who are stumbling to the slaughter. 12 If you say, “Behold, we did not know this,” does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who keeps watch over your soul know it, and will he not repay man according to his work?

It is used in texts like Genesis 32:11 (ESV),

11 Please deliver me from the hand of my brother, from the hand of Esau, for I fear him, that he may come and attack me, the mothers with the children.

Or Judges 6:9 (ESV),

9 And I delivered you from the hand of the Egyptians and from the hand of all who oppressed you, and drove them out before you and gave you their land.

This is a specific call to get involved. “The general application would include any who are in mortal danger, through disease, hunger, war—we cannot dodge responsibility, even by ignorance.”[1] We are not told about the circumstances behind this proverb.  We don’t know who is being taken away to death and stumbling to slaughter, but the themes within this literature may suggest either those who are experiencing injustice”.[2]

We note that the response to this crisis is “we did not know”.  As individuals viewing injustice we might think, “I can’t do anything.”  By placing the responsibility within the community, it eliminates that excuse.  The problem exists within the community.  And the community is judged, not so much for inaction, but lying.  There is One who evaluates all this.  The one who evaluates motives (lit., “who weights hearts”) refers to the Lord (All the ways of a man are pure in his own eyes, but the Lord weighs the spirit.” (Proverbs 16:2, ESV)). “To deny knowledge and responsibility is futile because God weighs hearts (Proverbs 21:12; Psalm 44:21). Inactivity is complicity (Ezekiel 3:17–18).”[3]

God is fully cognizant of what is going on. The rhetorical question is, “Will he not repay man according to his work.”[4]  The negligent will be repaid for his or her negligence. The righteous person, the one who embraces the way of wisdom in the Proverbs can never rest idly simply caring for his or her own well-doing without rescuing those who are being mistreated. Christians believe in justice.  We believe that the innocent ought to be defended and that the guilty should be punished in a just manner.

Our modern culture has perverted and confused the issues of justice, but that should not dissuade Christians from acting biblically.  Our God is a God of justice. “O Lord, you hear the desire of the afflicted; you will strengthen their heart; you will incline your ear to do justice to the fatherless and the oppressed, so that man who is of the earth may strike terror no more.” (Psalm 10:17–18, ESV).

“When the Christian faith functions in the way it should, Christians will take leadership in defending the cause of the one who has no defender.  William Wilberforce and other English Christians fought a heroic battle to end the slave trade, which had utterly oppressed so many.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in trying to rouse German Christians to work to save the Jews in Nazi Germany made much use of Galatians 6:10.”[5] 

One cannot read this passage without including with things like racism, inequity among marginalized peoples, the horror of abortion. With little imagination we think of the millions of babies that are in need of “rescue” and are “those who are being taken away to death.”[6]   We need to hear the words of this proverb and take them to heart: “Does not he who keeps watch over your soul know it, and will he not repay man according to his work?”[7]

Where do we start when the work is so momentous?  I think Bonhoeffer got it right.  

So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.” (Galatians 6:10, ESV)  

 

 

 

 



[1] Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Proverbs/Exposition of Proverbs/IV. The Sayings of the Wise (22:17-24:34)/A. Thirty Precepts of the Sages (22:17-24:22), Book Version: 4.0.2

[2] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 1176). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[3] Stabnow, D. K. (2017). Proverbs. In E. A. Blum & T. Wax (Eds.), CSB Study Bible: Notes (p. 991). Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers.

[4] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Pr 24:12). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[5] https://www.backtothebible.ca/articles/john-neufeld/what-is-the-christian-view-of-social-justice-part-1/

[6] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Pr 24:11). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[7] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Pr 24:12). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Thursday, October 8, 2020

An Analysis of The Gospel of John, Chapter 13, Verses 1-30

 SURVEY

In a careful reading of John 13:1-30, the author is clearly writing an historical narrative.  There are time indicators: “Now before the Feast” and “During the supper” stated within the first 2 verses.  John includes a theological proposition in verse 3 prior to describing the act of Christ in washing the disciple’s feet. There are hints of a betrayal positioned throughout the narrative culminating in the identification and expulsion of the traitor. A theme of “you are clean” “except your feet” to “not all of you are clean” runs consistently through the narrative. There are exhortations and admonitions of our Lord regarding “washing one another’s feet” and following His example.  And there is also an apparent promise “Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever receives the one I send receives me, and whoever receives me receives the one who sent me.”” (John 13:20, ESV) 

What role does this narrative play in this Gospel?  Is there a main flow of thought that unites all these elements into a common theme?  If there’s no common theme and flow of thought, then the passage acts something like a firecracker sending out fragments of light in various ways.  To those who have some familiarity with this passage often hear sermons on servanthood, betrayal and even commissioning. 

Within the passage there is great debate as to whether the meal in question is the Passover.  This paper isn’t going to discuss that issue and it is assumed that the meal is indeed the Passover.  It seems completely reasonable to me that John 13:1, in this transitory passage, it looks back summarily on the public ministry of Christ. “Now before the Feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart out of this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end.” (John 13:1, ESV).  Now the author turns his attention to the Feast and the events that will take place: “During supper, when the devil had already put it into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, to betray him, Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he had come from God and was going back to God, rose  . . .” (John 13:2–4, ESV).  It is the same meal. 

TEXT:  JOHN 13:1–30 (ESV)

CONTEXT

The most obvious observation that informs this passage is that it follows immediately after Jesus concludes His public ministry.  There is an apparent division in the Gospel whereby John provides insight into Christ’s public ministry (Chapters 1-12) with the remainder of the Gospel focusing on His Passion.  All of this is in view that John’s readers would “believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.”[1]  So it is probably with some purpose and intent that when Jesus identifies the betrayer in this passage, He Himself affirms: I am telling you this now, before it takes place, that when it does take place you may believe that I am he.” (John 13:19, ESV).

With the ending of the public ministry of Christ positioned prior to the text, we also note that the intimate ministry of Christ with His remaining Eleven commence at the end of the passage.  It is there he enters a personal and intimate dialogue prefaced with these words: “When he had gone out, Jesus said . . .;”[2] and we read these tender words: “Little children, yet a little while I am with you.”[3] “Little children or τεκνίον in the Greek text, pronounced tek·nee·on.  It was “used as a term of kindly address by teachers to their disciples.”[4] 

The passage acts as a transition from Christ’s public ministry to His private ministry with the remaining disciples.   In the second major unit of John’s Gospel, Jesus prepared his messianic community (represented by the Twelve, minus Judas) for the time following his exaltation to the Father. I agree with Stephen Wellum where he writes, “The community was first cleansed literally (foot washing, 13:1–17), then figuratively through the removal of the betrayer (13:18–30).”[5] Don Carson will comment: “On the one hand, it is symbolic of spiritual cleansing (cf. especially vv. 8–10); on the other, it serves as a standard of humble service and therefore as a call to all of Jesus’ disciples to ‘wash one another’s feet’ (vv. 12–17).”[6]  In the most general of ways I concede that this passage “serves as a standard of humble service” but such a statement lacks the specificity that the text demands.

ANALYSIS

The entire drama takes place as noted by the author “during Supper”.  Keeping the idea of transition in mind whereby Christ’s love for His disciples is expressed so clearly (vv 31ff), it would seem natural for the author to remind us in verse 1 that the entire public ministry of Christ can be summed up this way: “having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end.”[7]  That sentence itself flows from past to future.  The public ministry of Jesus will go down in history as “love for His own”; and this supper will go down in infamy as the “supper when the devil had already put it into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, to betray him.”[8] 

Verse 3 is a theological statement.  Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he had come from God and was going back to God.” (John 13:3, ESV).  This is the proposition that will commit Him to public execution.  It was His message to Israel: “Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me.” (John 8:42, ESV).  It also puts in place the events which will transpire: “I came from the Father and have come into the world, and now I am leaving the world and going to the Father.”” (John 16:28, ESV).

 Verses 1, 2 and 3 are Past, Present and Future.  Together they form an introduction to the drama that will follow. The presentation of the traitor is an ever-increasing revelation through this drama. There are four movements. 

I - John 13:1–3 (ESV)

1 Now before the Feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart out of this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end. 2 During supper, when the devil had already put it into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, to betray him, 3 Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he had come from God and was going back to God,

 

II - John 13:4–11 (ESV)

4 rose from supper. He laid aside his outer garments, and taking a towel, tied it around his waist. 5 Then he poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples’ feet and to wipe them with the towel that was wrapped around him. 6 He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, do you wash my feet?” 7 Jesus answered him, “What I am doing you do not understand now, but afterward you will understand.” 8 Peter said to him, “You shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered him, “If I do not wash you, you have no share with me.” 9 Simon Peter said to him, “Lord, not my feet only but also my hands and my head!” 10 Jesus said to him, “The one who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet, but is completely clean. And you are clean, but not every one of you.” 11 For he knew who was to betray him; that was why he said, “Not all of you are clean.”

 

III John 13:12–20 (ESV)

12 When he had washed their feet and put on his outer garments and resumed his place, he said to them, “Do you understand what I have done to you? 13 You call me Teacher and Lord, and you are right, for so I am. 14 If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. 15 For I have given you an example, that you also should do just as I have done to you. 16 Truly, truly, I say to you, a servant is not greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. 17 If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them. 18 I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen. But the Scripture will be fulfilled, ‘He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.’ 19 I am telling you this now, before it takes place, that when it does take place you may believe that I am he. 20 Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever receives the one I send receives me, and whoever receives me receives the one who sent me.”

 

IV - John 13:21–30 (ESV)

21 After saying these things, Jesus was troubled in his spirit, and testified, “Truly, truly, I say to you, one of you will betray me.” 22 The disciples looked at one another, uncertain of whom he spoke. 23 One of his disciples, whom Jesus loved, was reclining at table at Jesus’ side, 24 so Simon Peter motioned to him to ask Jesus of whom he was speaking. 25 So that disciple, leaning back against Jesus, said to him, “Lord, who is it?” 26 Jesus answered, “It is he to whom I will give this morsel of bread when I have dipped it.” So when he had dipped the morsel, he gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. 27 Then after he had taken the morsel, Satan entered into him. Jesus said to him, “What you are going to do, do quickly.” 28 Now no one at the table knew why he said this to him. 29 Some thought that, because Judas had the moneybag, Jesus was telling him, “Buy what we need for the feast,” or that he should give something to the poor. 30 So, after receiving the morsel of bread, he immediately went out. And it was night.

 

This segue in increasing measure to the traitor seems intentional.  One should note that in verses 12-20, where many see Jesus’ exhortation to follow his example in being a servant and doing good to one another, when you extract the traitor motif, the narrative clearly points to disciples washing one another’s feet in sanctifying cleansing, following by a blessing and a promise. 

Verses 4-11 follow a well-established pattern for Christ in the Gospel of John.  It was quite common for Christ to take an earthly custom or activity and transform it’s meaning into a spiritual lesson.  From John 2, the wedding of Cana through to the feeding of the five thousand, Jesus taught through a means of cultural transubstantiation – the form being retained but the meaning changed.  We know that because of this clue: ““What I am doing you do not understand now, but afterward you will understand.”[9]

In verses 4-11 the cultural habit of footwashing was viewed by our Savior as the sanctifying work of the Incarnate Word (see verse 10). The disciples are clean (i.e., justified) but as 1 John 1:9 reminds us, we need daily cleansing from daily experiences of earthly travel.  Ephesians 5:26 (ESV) clarifies Christ’s desire for the Church, “26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word.”

The flow of thought as Wellum affirms is continual established on “cleansing” – cleansing of the individual, with the accompanying revelation of who the traitor is and the eventual cleansing of the group.

SUMMARY

John 13:1-30 form for us a transition from the public ministry of Christ to His private ministry to His disciples.  Embedded in the narrative is the sovereignty of God, justification of the elect and the necessity of sanctification of those who truly belong to Him (“If I do not wash you, you have no share with me.”[10]).  As Christ washed His disciple’s feet, His Church is called to wash one another’s feet. This is not just a general call to servanthood within the Body.  This is a specific call to follow the example of Christ and serve one another through the washing of one another’s feet, that is, applying brotherly correction and cleansing through the application of the Word.  With the call to exemplify Jesus, there is a blessing and the promise of His authoritative presence (confirm: Matthew 18:20).

Interspersed within the narrative is the ever-increasing awareness of who the traitor is and his ultimate expulsion.  The cleansed group is now ready to hear, Little children, yet a little while I am with you. You will seek me, and just as I said to the Jews, so now I also say to you, ‘Where I am going you cannot come.’” (John 13:33, ESV).

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 20:31). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 13:31). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[3] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 13:33). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[4] Strong, J. (1995). Enhanced Strong’s Lexicon. Woodside Bible Fellowship.

[5] Wellum, S. J. (2017). Incarnation and Christology. In E. A. Blum & T. Wax (Eds.), CSB Study Bible: Notes (p. 1693). Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers.

[6] Carson, D. A. (1991). The Gospel according to John (p. 458). Leicester, England; Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press; W.B. Eerdmans.

[7] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 13:1). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[8] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 13:2). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[9] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 13:7). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[10] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Jn 13:8). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Monday, September 28, 2020

Midrash and the Modern Messenger

In John 13:18–19 (ESV), we read:

18 I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen. But the Scripture will be fulfilled, ‘He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.’ 19 I am telling you this now, before it takes place, that when it does take place you may believe that I am he.

Jesus is identifying the betrayer, Judas.  Judas, one of the twelve disciples chosen by the Lord is going to act in traitorous treachery.  According to the words of our Savior, He says to the disciples that the betrayal is taking place that “the Scripture will be fulfilled”.  Quite clearly in the text we assume that the reason Jesus chose Judas to betray him was to fulfill Scripture.  Literally the Greek text reads: “But so that the scripture may be fulfilled.”[1]

The psalm Jesus quoted was attributed to David, who lamented the defection of a trusted confidant (Ps 41:9). A parallel occurs in Psalm 55:12-14. Quite probably it referred originally to Ahithophel, who had been David's counselor and diplomatic advisor but deserted him in Absalom's rebellion (2Sam 15:12; 16:15-23; 17:4, 14, 23).”[2]

Normally we read the word “fulfilled” to indicate a direct prophetic accomplishment.  An example would be that in approximately 700 BC, the prophet Micah named the tiny village of Bethlehem as the birthplace of Israel's Messiah.  In Micah 5:2 (ESV) we read:

2 But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days.

The quotation cited by our Savior in John 13 is clearly not written in a way that the reader of the Psalm would think this was written to foretell a betrayal of the Messiah.  So, we are left with the question, what does “fulfill” mean in this text.  When Jesus says that an event “fulfills” Psalm 41:9 it does not necessary mean that the event was predicted.  As a modern reader we don’t quickly understand this.

This type of assertion was a form of Bible interpretation called “midrash” that helped Jews interpret a current happening by linking it to Scripture.  A midrash is like a parable or an allegory. One might also see it as an elevated illustration.  It includes elements of commentary.  I prefer to view it in terms of type and antitype.  In the case of Jesus and Judas, David and Ahithophel are the types and Jesus and Judas are the antitypes.  One is a foreshadowing of the other. 

Interestingly, the Apostle Peter employed the same interpretative method in the process of selecting Judas’ replacement.  We read in Acts 1:16–20 (ESV)

16 “Brothers, the Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus . . . 20 “For it is written in the Book of Psalms, “ ‘May his camp become desolate, and let there be no one to dwell in it’; and “ ‘Let another take his office.’”

A more familiar example is found in Matthew chapter 2 where we read: “Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt.”[3]  Then we read: “This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, ‘Out of Egypt I called my son.’” [4]  The citation from Hosea 11:1 refers to Israel—not to Jesus. However, we recognize this as midrash rather than predicted prophecy.  Some refer to it as prophecy by parallelism.

What was appropriate for Matthew, for John, for Paul and other inspired writers is not appropriate for modern scholars, preachers, and authors.  Too often creative (overly creative) preachers and teachers will assert a certain doctrine or principle and reach back into the Old Testament and claim that this fulfills a particular Old Testament story of verse.  I recall one preacher attempting to show that the rescuing of Rahab in Joshua 2 anticipated the secret rapture of the Church.   

The Midrashian interpretation of Scripture, that is inspired and recorded in the Bible is one thing.  For pastors and teachers to employ the same method of interpretation is tantamount to claiming for themselves infallibility and inspiration.  It is an attractive method for the lazy and dishonest preacher for they soon succeed in providing their congregations with ever new and creative interpretations of the Bible.  It both denies the sufficiency of Scripture and the perpetuity of Scripture. 

So from John 13 we learn two things:  One, is that the word “fulfilled” does not always mean predictive prophecy realized; and Secondly, the art of Midrashian interpretation is only trustworthy when it is evidenced within the text of Scripture by inspired authors.  We have no liberty to turn any text from type to anti-type on our own whim and authority.

 

 

 



[1] Biblical Studies Press. (2005). The NET Bible First Edition; Bible. English. NET Bible.; The NET Bible. Biblical Studies Press.

[2] Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:John/Exposition of John/III. The Private Ministry of the Word (13:1-17:26)/A. The Last Supper (13:1-30)/1. The washing of feet (13:1-20), Book Version: 4.0.2

[3] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Mt 2:13). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

[4] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Mt 2:15). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.