Search This Blog

Saturday, December 30, 2017

Hallowed Be Thy Name

Jesus taught, “Pray then like this: “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name” (Matthew 6:9, ESV). 

This is not an assertion in prayer.  This is a petition.  It is the chief petition.  It is the all-encompassing, all-important petition.  It is the petition that governs our prayer life.  “Jesus is not saying, ‘Father, Your name is holy,’ but, ‘Father, may Your name be hallowed.’ That is, He is teaching us to ask that God's name would be regarded as sacred, that it would be treated with reverence, and that it would be seen as holy.”[1]  

This prayer, I contend, is the prayer that seeks to obey the Third Commandment: “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain” (Exodus 20:7, ESV).  This might include swearing and blaspheme, but it is far more than that.

The word “vanity” or vain speaks of emptiness – nothingness.   Moses said, “Don’t take” or don’t carry the Name of God lightly.  Don’t treat God as inconsequential.  It is possible to treat God as irrelevant, as unimportant or as insignificant.   Don’t think that God’s not there for you.  Don’t think that God can’t conquer whatever your afraid of.  Don’t think that God can’t satisfy your heart’s desire.

Let me give you an example of how we might err in this.  You are single.  You desire deeply to be married and to be loved.  As your heart cries to God, don’t forget to carry with you the truth that God is really all you really need.  God is enough.  God is not nothing (NB: the double negative).  God is not inconsequential.





[1] R.C. Sproul. The Prayer of the Lord (Kindle Locations 300-301). Kindle Edition.

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

An Important Reminder to Everyone at Christmas

Jesus takes on somewhat of a fanciful, fairy tale appearance at Christmas.  He is just a really, really nice idea and he makes all the Christmas stuff seem so legitimate and fun.  He is just a really, really good baby.  He doesn't even cry.  Of course he is also so nice to bad people and accepts everyone!  C. S. Lewis, speaking in 1942 said this about Jesus.
I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to. . . . Now it seems to me obvious that He was neither a lunatic nor a fiend: and consequently, however strange or terrifying or unlikely it may seem, I have to accept the view that He was and is God. [1]

__________________________________________________
1. Lewis, C.S., Mere Christianity, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York USA, 1960, Pages 55-56



Friday, December 15, 2017

Dr. R.C. Sproul 1939-2017

To comment on the death of Dr. R.C. Sproul, Sr., among the giants of contemporary theologians and pastors seems almost arrogant, if not presumptuous.  Despite that I carry no shame.  For indeed RC was a theologian for the people.  He made the magnanimous task of history, philosophy and Biblical doctrine palatable to the common, every-day believer.  His infectious laugh made the handling of even hotly disputed doctrines rest easy on our minds.  I’m not certain when and where I was introduced to the teaching of RC Sproul.  What I am certain of is the eternal and indelible impact his ministry had on my life for the past 29 years.  My ongoing gain in his influence is made more certain by the many books of RC’s that I own; the tapes and DVDs; and the inexhaustible resources available on the Internet. 

I considered and gave thanks to God for several personal and meaningful things in my life and ministry that are a direct result of RC’s influence.  Here are 5, to name a few:

1. RC taught me that you cannot divorce history and philosophy from Truth.  When asked a question, RC never gave a simple answer, yet he always provided a clear answer.  Questions of theology can not be divorced from the historical context that they emerged.  Answers in theology can not be expressed apart from sound, lucid logic.  Watching RC taught me to picture a theological answer in terms of a funnel.  The response starts at the top in the broadest and widest context but through careful thought it comes to a pointed and specific conclusion.  

2.  RC modeled before me amazing courage.  During days when his personal friends and colleagues in ministry were seeking to embrace the Church of Rome, RC stood strong.  He understood that the issue was not catholic unity, nor was it fellowship reduced to the basics.  RC saw that what was at stake is the Gospel.  The Roman Catholic Church denies the essence of the Gospel and in doing so denies God.  RC could see that when others could not. 

3.  On the heels of my respect for his courage was also my respect for RC’s immovable stance on justification of the sinner, by faith alone in Christ alone.  I doubt if there was a book, sermon or conference message that did not at least include some reference to this doctrine by which the Church stands or falls.  RC understood as the Bible clearly affirms that the only saving hope of us who are sinners is to receive by faith “not a righteousness of our own” by the very righteousness of God.

4.  Not far removed from the above points was also RC’s commitment to the inerrancy of the Scriptures.  I recall in my early Christian life hearing him refute the common saying, “The Bible says it; I believe it; and that settles it.”  RC would lovingly rebuke such ideas.  He would retort, “If the Bible says it, it is settled, whether you believe it or not.”  If we have no inerrant, authoritative, sufficient Scriptures we are lost in a quagmire of human ideas and speculation. 

5. Lastly, but not finally, RC taught me that an effective teacher and preacher could also communicate with children.  RC wrote some memorable children’s books including my favorite, The Priest With Dirty Clothes.  For a man that was steeped in such heady and deep doctrines of the Bible, he could penetrate that fog with a light that allowed even children to see the Truth with clarity.  That, I believe, is a rare skill. That is a teacher!

No doubt, it will be said repeatedly that Dr. Sproul was not perfect.  That is certainly true of him and us.  His perfection was earned and gained by Another who took his place. I could never understand his seemingly illogical stance of infant baptism.  I would marvel at a man with such profound understanding of Christian truth lose all sense of rational and Scriptural deduction on this issue.  But today as I pen these thoughts, what joy it is to know that RC is in the presence of his Savior and his daily maxim of Coram Deo, living in God’s presence has been fulfilled in everlasting joy.  For those of us who have believed the Gospel of grace, we will soon join him. You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore” (Psalm 16:11, ESV).




Friday, December 1, 2017

The Extraordinary Light of Scripture

In a great article by Dr. Michael Haykin entitled: Remembering the Ministry of William Bridge, printed in the Fall Edition of the publication, Jubilee,[1] Dr Haykin references some of the thoughts of Bridge in relation to our Christian adherence to the written Word of God in contrast to the subjective impressions and supposed leadings of the Holy Spirit.   The article is worth reading in it’s entirety.  Here are a few insightful quotes from a preacher from the 17th Century.

  • Impressions, for example, “though good, are not our daily food.”
  • Bridge admitted that God is indeed able to employ such to guide his people since the closure of the canon of the Scriptures, but essentially the written Word of God has replaced them, and they are to be viewed with great wariness.
  • “If Luther had hearkened to revelations and visions, and not kept close to the Scripture, what had become of his reformation?”
  • “Though God may sometimes lead a man in extraordinary ways, and work by ways and means extraordinary; yet if a man’s heart be drawn off from the ordinary means by what is extraordinary, it is not right.
  • In response to the Quakers who believed “if the Spirit that is in me, be the same Spirit with that which did write the Scripture, what need I wait on or be ruled by the word without, or the Scripture, any longer”, Bridge responded: “Because, although ye have the same Spirit which did write the Scriptures, yet you have not the same inspiration of the Spirit.”
  • [“T]his light of Scripture is the best light, the most excellent light; more excellent than that of revelations and visions; more excellent than that of dreams and immediate voices; more excellent than that of impressions; more excellent than that of the law and light within; more excellent than that of Christian experience, or that of divine providence, or that of human reason; more excellent than this pretended light (but in truth, darkness) of judicial astrology. Surely therefore it is the most excellent, safe and sure light in the world.”
  • Here is our exhortation: “Let it be your continual companion, going where you go; if you go into the fields, oh! let the word go with you; if into your calling, oh! let the Scripture and the written word of God be with you. Thus shall you take heed unto it, as to a light shining in a dark place.”


Emphasis mine!




[1] Pages 34-44

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Who Is Called and What Are They Called To?

I have joined in, many times, is singing Paul Baloche’s new worship song: Same Love. On the surface this seems to be a great song, but I had a nagging thought that something was wrong.  Recently a musician in my church said that we should have sung “Same Love” as a closing song.  I hesitated, again nagged by this discomfort.  It helped to read Baloche’s context for writing the song.  He said in an interview:

“I was born again when I was 18 years old, and the idea of this song is that the same Love that radically changed my life about 25 years ago, still compels me to want to walk in obedience and serve the Lord. I am compelled to pick up my cross daily and follow Jesus. That's what we are called to do.”[1]

Immediately I recognized the integrity and authenticity of the lyrics.  Prior to that I had two main concerns: One, was Baloche assuming the same expression of love to all things and all people by our God; and Two, had Baloche misunderstood the “calling” of God that is deemed general to all people but effectual to the Elect?  (One must not ignore the fact that it is the redeemed that are given the name, “the called”[2].)

When understood correctly, this song is profoundly rich.  God’s saving love, is also His sanctifying love.  The same love that took your burdens at Calvary, has given to us the burden of pursuing holiness.  The same love who accepted us “just as we are” is calling us to be “just as He is”.   Jesus, speaking of Himself as the Good Shepherd says,

. . . The sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has brought out all his own, he goes before them, and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice.” (John 10:3–4, ESV) [Emphasis Mine]

In salvation Christ calls to the humble, the broken and in grace He sets the captives free. “For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth” (1 Corinthians 1:26, ESV).  Jesus also calls us to follow Him “… and take up his cross and follow me” (Matthew 16:24, ESV).  Why did Baloche give special attention to the faithless, cynic and proud?  In the above-mentioned interview, he said, “But He's really calling us to die to ourselves to find freedom and liberty in Him.” He imagines that some Christians are hurt and stand in contempt of the Church and their lives.  They become distrustful and faithless.  The antidote to both is to deny self and follow Jesus. 

When properly understood in its authorial and Biblical context, a song that was confusing to me has proven to be wonderfully Gospel-centered and sanctifying piece of music.  I might not be alone in this confusion, which might compel worship leaders and musicians to "set the song up" so that people are sure of what they are "addressing one another" about (Ephesians 5:19).

Isaiah 43:1 (ESV)

1 But now thus says the Lord, he who created you, O Jacob, he who formed you, O Israel: “Fear not, for I have redeemed you; I have called you by name, you are mine.






[1] http://www.newreleasetoday.com/article.php?article_id=909
[2]Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James, To those who are called, beloved in God the Father and kept for Jesus Christ:” (Jude 1, ESV)

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

Daytime Christians

It would be somewhat of an outrage to see someone wandering around in the daytime, drunk and disorderly.  Although not recommended, to see the same thing at night is not such a surprise.  In 1 Thessalonians 5:4-11, Paul employs this metaphor to the Christian life.  People who are of the "day" should not be seen as sleepy and inebriated. Christians are people of the day. 

To live in the light -- to live in the day, is to suggest alertness -- morally and spiritually.  Such drowsiness is inconsistent with children of the Light.  So again, Paul lays out the indicative:

8 But since we belong to the day, 

and then moves into the imperative:

let us be sober, having put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation.

Our identity in Christ is children of the day; children of Light.  Our activity in Christ is to be spiritually sober and alert - bearing the graces of Christ.

  

Sunday, November 12, 2017

The Hall of Shame

Any casual news observer must agree that the number of stories accusing men of sexual misconduct is far from casual. It is alarming!  Every day there are new men added to this hall of shame.  In no particular order there is Star Trek icon George Takei, accused of sexual assault.  Comedian Louis C.K. has said the sexual misconduct allegations levied against him are true.  Added to the list is Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, and even George Bush.  CNN has a more complete list here.

What are Christians to make of all this?  Personally I feel self-righteously pharisee’n.  My initial reaction is that in a world where sex is no less sacred than a game of tennis; in a world where sex is lust without boundaries; in a world where God’s purpose for sex and marriage is not only ignored, but openly mocked; and in a world where people are not much different than your junkyard dog – what’s all the fuss?

My pomposity falls like autumn leaves in the wind when I consider the record of so-called Christians.  The Church has a pretty tainted history in matters of sexual misconduct.  But the fuss in this current exposé appears to have nothing to do with deprave sexual conduct.  The fuss is about consent.  Our society assumes that anything is permissible as long as there is consent.  None of these men would be before the court of popular opinion if their intended targets had concurred with their perversion.

The problem of using the criteria of consent can be summed up this way: Consent may comply with legal requirements and be totally opposed to ethical standards. Consent is the willingness of the parties involved.  To clarify: the standard being upheld in these cases is the human will.  Here is what Christians ought to notice: When you crown the human will, any eventuality is possible. 

The human will is not the boss.  (As long as there is consent)
The human emotion is not the boss.  (If it feels right)
The human heart is not the boss. (As long as they love each other)
The human government is not the boss. (It is legal)
The human court of opinion is not the boss. (Everybody does it)

Christians should not fall prey to the rhetoric in these cases.  God’s standard of conduct trumps consent -- every time.

Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.” (Hebrews 13:4, NIV)






Friday, November 10, 2017

How To Glorify God in the Gospel on November 11th.

Every November 11th, Canadians stop on Remembrance Day to remember those that died on both sides of the conflict.  Remembrance Day marks the end of World War I in 1918, but traditional all wars both past and current are considered.  The red remembrance poppy has become a familiar emblem of Remembrance Day due to the poem "In Flanders Fields" written by Canadian physician Lieutenant-Colonel John McCrae.

I rarely remember a Remembrance Day as a serving officer in the PPCLI that wasn’t bitterly cold.  Yet despite the frigid weather people from all walks of life attend with sobriety the parades, the cenotaph memorials and the services surrounding this Day. 

As a Christian we are clearly called to honor those who have expressed that “greater love[1].  Dr. John Piper is quoted as saying, “All heroes are shadows of Christ.”  The double sadness that marks most Remembrance Day ceremonies includes not only the sadness that comes from grieving over lost lives, but the sadness that silently pervades such observances: the absence of Christ and the Gospel.

Remembrance Day is to be a re-capitulation of the Gospel.  James was right when he wrote: “What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you?” (James 4:1, NIV).   In each of us there is a self-absorbed, selfish nature that the Bible calls sin.  We are born with it.  This nature gives rise to this universal assessment: “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” (Romans 3:23, NIV). 

It is, in this battle that a true Friend enters.  More than give His life for comrades, He is said to have “. . .  demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8, NIV).  Indeed “very rarely will anyone die for a righteous person, though for a good person someone might possibly dare to die” (Romans 5:7, NIV).

Christ Jesus did not only die for sinners, for those who believe and trust what He did, He makes them His friends – He adopts them into His family. By placing His ownership on you by giving you His Holy Spirit, we can be assured that “. . . the Spirit you received brought about your adoption to sonship. And by him we cry, “Abba, Father”” (Romans 8:15, NIV).

At every Remembrance Day service there is a unanimous call, to “Never again.”   Although sincere, we must admit that it can never be accomplished by human effort.  But through the One who is the Prince of Peace, someday His Eternal Kingdom will reign on earth.  At that time, “he will judge between many peoples and will settle disputes for strong nations far and wide. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.” (Micah 4:3, NIV).

This same Jesus promises to “. . . create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.” (Isaiah 65:17, NIV). 





[1]Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.” (John 15:13, NIV)

Monday, November 6, 2017

Exposition of Titus Lesson 7 Final Remarks

Exposition of Paul’s Letter to
TITUS

LESSON 7: FINAL REMARKS

Review

Paul’s flow of thought to Titus:

  
Text: Titus 3:9-15

9 But avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law, for they are unprofitable and worthless. 10 As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, 11 knowing that such a person is warped and sinful; he is self-condemned. 12 When I send Artemas or Tychicus to you, do your best to come to me at Nicopolis, for I have decided to spend the winter there. 13 Do your best to speed Zenas the lawyer and Apollos on their way; see that they lack nothing. 14 And let our people learn to devote themselves to good works, so as to help cases of urgent need, and not be unfruitful. 15 All who are with me send greetings to you. Greet those who love us in the faith. Grace be with you all.

Exposition Titus 3:9-15

A.    The Problem Re-Sated

But avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law.”[1]  The spiritual leader must shun, avoid – don’t even bother investigating, these fanciful notions that are occupying the conversations of those disturbing the Church.  Why? “They are unprofitable and worthless.”[2]  As we noted before, the substance of these controversies is unknown except that they must have been fanciful fiction that had been added to the text of Scripture rather than drawn from it.   One might call it “speculation”. 

The Expositor’s Bible Commentary notes: “These myths seemingly were speculative and fanciful inventions drawn from the OT records such as are found in the apocryphal and pseudepigraphical writings of Judaism.”[3] 

Again, let us emphasize that false teachers always either misuse the Bible (as taking verses out of context) or add to it (some rule or religious duty done for merit) or take away from it (like denying the sufficiency of Christ).  When the meaning of the Bible, exegetically exposed is replaced with some insatiable desire to find a “deeper meaning” you can literally make the Bible say whatever you want. When Titus recognizes this, he is simply not even supposed to engage in these debates.  If the issue is something outside the Bible how can you possibly discuss it?

These divisive, disturbers are to be warned – at least twice, and then disfellowshipped.  Again Paul characterizes the sin of these disturbers: “. . .  knowing that such a person is warped and sinful; he is self-condemned.” (Titus 3:10–11, ESV). 

B.     Concluding Remarks

Paul concludes with some personal notes:

      1.       To Titus:  He is to meet Paul for the winter in Nicopolis. “Nicopolis was a port city in Epirus, on the west coast of the Greek peninsula and about 200 miles (322 km) northwest of Athens.”[4]
      2.       To Artemas or Tychicus:  One of these men will take Titus’ place in Crete. We know nothing of Artemus, but Tychicus was often spoken of by Paul is helping him in his endeavors. He “accompanied Paul on his third journey (Acts 20:4). In Eph. 6:21 and Col. 4:7 he is referred to as a “beloved brother and faithful minister” (see also 2 Tim. 4:12.”[5]
      3.       Zenas and Apollos are likely bringing this letter and Titus is to look after them and equip them for the rest of their journey.  Zenas we have no Biblical record of but Apollos was a Jewish Christian from Alexandria in Egypt (Acts 18:24). We remember that Apollos was well-versed in the Scriptures and an eloquent speaker.

Paul’s final pastoral appeal in this letter is stated this way: “And let our people learn to devote themselves to good works, so as to help cases of urgent need, and not be unfruitful” (Titus 3:14, ESV).  Here Paul returns to the theme of the letter, but as he does in so many cases he adds an insight that is important.  The good works of the Gospel are intended to meet necessary uses.

The Greek word ἀναγκαῖος [pronounced an·ang·kah·yos] speaks of things “of necessity, what one cannot do without, indispensable, etc. [6]  To engage in acts of goodness when it is not necessary is to waste God’s provision.  Opportunities for doing good lie all around us.  We exercise Biblical wisdom and make our lives fruitful when we discern those that are of necessity. 

To this Paul adds his concluding greeting: All who are with me send greetings to you. Greet those who love us in the faith. Grace be with you all.” (Titus 3:15, ESV)


Conclusion

In this letter we learn that:

      a.       Those who entertain speculative notions, not according to the written Word, cannot be pacified and catered to. I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favor of one against another.” (1 Corinthians 4:6, ESV)
      b.       Elders are to be examples of the Church.  This means that the character qualifications for biblical eldership actually applies to all Christians. So I exhort the elders among you, as a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, as well as a partaker in the glory that is going to be revealed: shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you; not for shameful gain, but eagerly; not domineering over those in your charge, but being examples to the flock.” (1 Peter 5:1–3, ESV)
      c.       Holiness is the result of Gospel believing.  We never outgrow the Gospel. The way we are to live is the same as the way we started. Therefore, as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him,” (Colossians 2:6, ESV)


Questions






[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Tt 3:9). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Tt 3:9). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
[3] Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Titus/Exposition of Titus/II. Concerning Elders and Errorists in Crete (1:5-16)/B. The Refutation of False Teachers (1:10-16)/2. The response to the situation (1:13b-14), Book Version: 4.0.2
[4] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 2351). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[5] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 2351). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[6] Strong, J. (1995). Enhanced Strong’s Lexicon. Woodside Bible Fellowship.

Friday, November 3, 2017

Powerful Statement on the Relationship Between Salvation and Good Works.

I doubt if I have read a more compelling excerpt on the topic of Christianity and ethical, moral conduct than in this book, entitled "The Colson Way: Loving Your Neighbor and Living with Faith in a Hostile World" [1].   The author, Owen Strachan has written a stimulating biography of Chuck Colson’s joyful and determined life of Christian witness and service.  This excerpt should not be missed:

"Too often, Christians treat the gospel and ethics as if they are separate matters. Some believers like preaching the word of Christ; some like thinking about traditional ethical topics. There doesn’t seem to be much connection between the two. In reality, the gospel creates ethics. When Jesus saves you, you emerge from the experience a new person with a new set of priorities and beliefs. You can no longer treat life lightly (Ps. 139). You are given a great love for the natural family, which owes to God’s intelligent design (Gen. 2:14–25). You seek to advocate for religious freedom because you recognize that without it, people will wither and suffer (Matt. 22:21).

The gospel creates ethics. It brings to life our best instincts. The message of Christ creates in the redeemed a thirst for racial unity (Eph. 2:15). It overcomes tension between the sexes (Gal. 3:27–28). It removes barriers between social classes (Philem. 1:16). It gives us a hunger to work and a zest for creativity (Col. 3:23). It makes us weep for every human person, made in the image of God, who suffers under the curse, and it causes us to want to do good to everyone (Gal. 6:10). It awakens us to the duties of citizenship and the need to pray for political righteousness (Rom. 13; 1 Tim. 2:2). In sum, the gospel causes us to want to be salt and light in a darkened world in every possible way (Matt. 5:13–16)."



______________________________________
1. Strachan, Owen. The Colson Way: Loving Your Neighbor and Living with Faith in a Hostile World (pp. 72-73). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.

The Sayings of the Wise – Part 24

THIRTY SAYINGS OF THE WISE

SAYING NUMBER TWENTY-THREE

Proverbs 24:8–9 (ESV)

8 Whoever plans to do evil will be called a schemer. 9 The devising of folly is sin, and the scoffer is an abomination to mankind.

The key word in this couplet is the word “schemer” and the conclusion is summed up in the word “abomination”.  This “deviser of evil” plans his evil schemes and is repulsive to mankind everywhere.  “Those who plan to do evil (v. 8) quickly get a reputation for it.”[1]  “His coldly calculated actions to defraud society shows he is neither intellectually dull nor emotionally impulsive.”[2]  This activity is called for what it is: sin.

The premeditated engineering of evil, devoid of any moral compass except personal desire is sin.  It is seen for what it is and it is seen by the community at large.  Paul describes those who have turned from God and are therefore given to such wicked minds as: slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents,” (Romans 1:30, ESV).  Note “inventors of evil”.  Where does evil come from?  James 1:14–15 (ESV) defines the process this way:

14 But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. 15 Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death.

Matthew Henry comments: “We contract guilt, not only by the act of foolishness, but by the thought of it, though it go no further; the first risings of sin in the heart are sin, offensive to God, and must be repented of or we are undone.”[3]

This person does not repent, but rather is a “mocker”.  They speak boastfully.  They are proud of their sinful scheming.  There is a warning here.  The Scriptures speak of a better way:

Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on his law he meditates day and night.” (Psalm 1:1–2, ESV)









[1] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 1176). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[2] Waltke, B. K. (2005). The Book of Proverbs, Chapters 15–31 (p. 274). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Paul Believed That One Could Believe -- In Vain.

IN VAIN.

Greek = εἰκῇ = without success or effort.

      ·         1 Corinthians 15:2 (ESV)  and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.
      ·         1 Corinthians 15:10 (ESV)  But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me.
      ·         2 Corinthians 6:1 (ESV) Working together with him, then, we appeal to you not to receive the grace of God in vain.
      ·         Philippians 2:16 (ESV)  holding fast to the word of life, so that in the day of Christ I may be proud that I did not run in vain or labor in vain.
      ·         1 Thessalonians 2:1 (ESV) For you yourselves know, brothers, that our coming to you was not in vain.
      ·         1 Thessalonians 3:5 (ESV) For this reason, when I could bear it no longer, I sent to learn about your faith, for fear that somehow the tempter had tempted you and our labor would be in vain.


It is possible that one can labor in the Gospel and that people can believe – IN VAIN; that is "without purpose or success."  If there is no perseverance; if there is no standing in the face of opposition and persecution – one may have believed in vain!


Thursday, October 26, 2017

Exposition of Titus Lesson 6 A Gospel Influenced Society

Exposition of Paul’s Letter to
TITUS

LESSON 6: A GOSPEL INFLUENCED SOCIETY

Review

Justin Taylor writes, “The dominant mode of evangelical preaching on sanctification, the main way to motivate for godly living, sounds something like this:

You are not _____;
You should be _________;
Therefore, do or be ________!

Fill in the blank with anything good and biblical (holy; salt and light; feed the poor; walk humbly; give generously; etc.).”[1]

“This is not how Paul and the other New Testament writers motivated the church in light of the resurrection and the outpouring of the Spirit. They did give imperatives (=what you should do), but they do so only based on indicatives (=what God has done).”[2]   Therefore in the last lecture we saw how Paul did that with Titus.  When it came to giving commands he did it this way:


1.       This is what various gender/age groups must do (2:1–10); because
1.1.    This is what is true (the Gospel) (2:11–14); and
1.1.1. To summarize (2:15)

2.       Here are more instructions to proper living that you must do (3:1–2)
2.1.    This is what is true (Gospel) (3:3–7); and
2.1.1.Here is the summary (3:8)

This week we look at the 2nd section of commands in Chapter 3.

Text: Titus 3:1–8

1 Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work, 2 to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy toward all people. 3 For we ourselves were once foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing our days in malice and envy, hated by others and hating one another. 4 But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, 5 he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, 6 whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life. 8 The saying is trustworthy, and I want you to insist on these things, so that those who have believed in God may be careful to devote themselves to good works. These things are excellent and profitable for people.  

Exposition Titus 3:1–11

Here Is What You Are To Do (3:1-2)

Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work, to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy toward all people.

Christians have Gospel obligations to civil government and fellow citizens.  Christians live in God’s Kingdom so Paul uniquely writes to Titus that Christians are to be “willingly be in subjection” to earthly rulers.  The Greek tense is in the “middle voice” and could be translated “subjecting yourselves to”.  Of course, even in the next phrase (“be obedient”) we know Paul is not making this an absolute, but is a general rule of conduct (see Acts 5:29).  Remember that the Cretan society was recognized as being rebellious.

There is a transition from civil government to civil society.  Christians should be ready for good work.  I spoke of this recently considering the cultural mandate in Creation.  This seems to be a major theme as we noted in the last lesson in Titus 2:7 (ESV), “Show yourself in all respects to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity. . ..”     “This seems to indicate the believer’s sphere of influence for good ought to be felt in every realm. Joseph, Daniel,” [3] etc. are good examples of this.

Gospel motivated Believers are also called to “speak evil of no one”.  “The Greek word used here, blasphēmeō, describes speaking against someone with the purpose of harming his or her reputation. Believers will ruin their own reputation if they seek to ruin the reputation of others.”[4]  Christians should not be known to be quarrelsome and contentious but rather on the positive side being gentle.  Rather than retaliating, Believers ought to be willing to yield rights to another. 

The reason we ought to act in these ways is because of the Gospel which we have believed and has saved us.

What is True?  (The Gospel Basis for Holy Living) (3:3-7)

Paul's opening "for" in the original (gar, not represented in the NIV rendering) again indicates that the required conduct is being undergirded by weighty reasons.”[5]

For we ourselves were once foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing our days in malice and envy, hated by others and hating one another. But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

1. We remember where we came from (v.3).   Seven indicators of our unconverted life are stated.  Before we were saved we were:

       1.       Without understanding; unable to perceive truth.
       2.       Disobedient.
       3.       Deceived.
       4.       Enslaved by our own passions and pleasures.
       5.       (When we are self-serving and selfish) Being mean to others and envying others.
       6.       People who were detested by others.
       7.       Involved in hating one another.

Paul says, “Before you jump all over others, remind yourself of your own history.” 

2. We realize that all we have came to us via free grace (4-7).   What was God’s disposition toward hostile sinners?  Answer: Good and loving-kindness (or mercy).  Mercy is withholding justice that is deserved. And this mercifully, kind Savior, “He saved us. This is the aorist tense meaning it happened in the past.  It is complete.  It will never be repeated.  It’s a done deal.  How did God save us?  What was the channel, the means whereby He saved us: 

       a)       NOT …. “not because of works done by us in righteousness.”[6]
       b)      BUT …. “but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit.”[7]

We contributed nothing to our salvation.  God saves us by mercy (withholding due judgment) and through regeneration – through the New Birth.  Jesus taught on this necessity for the New Birth (John 3:3, 5, 8).  It is the only way that the Bible determines that dead people can become alive (Ephesians 2:1–6).  Cleansing and regeneration are two sides of the same coin of New Birth.  By the way, there is no linguistic or exegetical need to read into this the ordinance of baptism. We note however that Paul refers to the work of the Spirit as whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior,” (Titus 3:6, ESV). 

“’Whom he poured out on us generously,’ or ‘richly,’ stresses that God has made ample provision for the development of this renewed life.”[8]

And what is the result of this saving mercy of God in Christ?  Answer:

       a)       We are justified. We are pronounced righteous.  We are pronounced guiltless.
       b)      We are made heirs.  Notice Peter’s words: “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.” (1 Peter 1:3–5, ESV)
       c)       We have hope of eternal life.

Contextual Application

So how does this work?  Treat non-Christians with respect and dignity because the only difference between us and them is mercy – free undeserved mercy.  Belief in the gospel message of free forgiveness for sinners on the sole basis of faith must result in a merciful, kind and respectful attitude to unbelievers whether they are in civic office or society.  

Conclusion (3:8)

The saying is trustworthy, and I want you to insist on these things, so that those who have believed in God may be careful to devote themselves to good works. These things are excellent and profitable for people.

The command to insist on these things is similar to 2:15, both statements carrying a significant tone of authority. Again, note the emphasis on good works as a mark of believers (see 1:16; 2:14; 3:1).”[9]  The practice of good works is the logical expectation of a true receiving and believing of the Gospel of the grace of God,

Questions





[1] https://blogs.thegospelcoalition.org/justintaylor/2010/05/03/imperatives-indicatives-impossibilities/
[2] Ibid,
[3] Hindson, E. E., & Kroll, W. M. (Eds.). (1994). KJV Bible Commentary (p. 2523). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
[4] Barry, J. D., Mangum, D., Brown, D. R., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Ritzema, E., … Bomar, D. (2012, 2016). Faithlife Study Bible (Tt 3:2). Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.
[5] Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Titus/Exposition of Titus/IV. Concerning Believers Among Men Generally (3:1-11)/B. The Motives for Such Godly Conduct (3:3-8), Book Version: 4.0.2
[6] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Tt 3:5). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
[7] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Tt 3:5). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
[8] Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Titus/Exposition of Titus/IV. Concerning Believers Among Men Generally (3:1-11)/B. The Motives for Such Godly Conduct (3:3-8)/2. The motive from our present salvation (3:4-7)/c. Its means (3:5b-6), Book Version: 4.0.2
[9] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 2351). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.