Search This Blog

Saturday, December 30, 2017

Hallowed Be Thy Name

Jesus taught, “Pray then like this: “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name” (Matthew 6:9, ESV). 

This is not an assertion in prayer.  This is a petition.  It is the chief petition.  It is the all-encompassing, all-important petition.  It is the petition that governs our prayer life.  “Jesus is not saying, ‘Father, Your name is holy,’ but, ‘Father, may Your name be hallowed.’ That is, He is teaching us to ask that God's name would be regarded as sacred, that it would be treated with reverence, and that it would be seen as holy.”[1]  

This prayer, I contend, is the prayer that seeks to obey the Third Commandment: “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain” (Exodus 20:7, ESV).  This might include swearing and blaspheme, but it is far more than that.

The word “vanity” or vain speaks of emptiness – nothingness.   Moses said, “Don’t take” or don’t carry the Name of God lightly.  Don’t treat God as inconsequential.  It is possible to treat God as irrelevant, as unimportant or as insignificant.   Don’t think that God’s not there for you.  Don’t think that God can’t conquer whatever your afraid of.  Don’t think that God can’t satisfy your heart’s desire.

Let me give you an example of how we might err in this.  You are single.  You desire deeply to be married and to be loved.  As your heart cries to God, don’t forget to carry with you the truth that God is really all you really need.  God is enough.  God is not nothing (NB: the double negative).  God is not inconsequential.





[1] R.C. Sproul. The Prayer of the Lord (Kindle Locations 300-301). Kindle Edition.

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

An Important Reminder to Everyone at Christmas

Jesus takes on somewhat of a fanciful, fairy tale appearance at Christmas.  He is just a really, really nice idea and he makes all the Christmas stuff seem so legitimate and fun.  He is just a really, really good baby.  He doesn't even cry.  Of course he is also so nice to bad people and accepts everyone!  C. S. Lewis, speaking in 1942 said this about Jesus.
I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to. . . . Now it seems to me obvious that He was neither a lunatic nor a fiend: and consequently, however strange or terrifying or unlikely it may seem, I have to accept the view that He was and is God. [1]

__________________________________________________
1. Lewis, C.S., Mere Christianity, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York USA, 1960, Pages 55-56



Friday, December 15, 2017

Dr. R.C. Sproul 1939-2017

To comment on the death of Dr. R.C. Sproul, Sr., among the giants of contemporary theologians and pastors seems almost arrogant, if not presumptuous.  Despite that I carry no shame.  For indeed RC was a theologian for the people.  He made the magnanimous task of history, philosophy and Biblical doctrine palatable to the common, every-day believer.  His infectious laugh made the handling of even hotly disputed doctrines rest easy on our minds.  I’m not certain when and where I was introduced to the teaching of RC Sproul.  What I am certain of is the eternal and indelible impact his ministry had on my life for the past 29 years.  My ongoing gain in his influence is made more certain by the many books of RC’s that I own; the tapes and DVDs; and the inexhaustible resources available on the Internet. 

I considered and gave thanks to God for several personal and meaningful things in my life and ministry that are a direct result of RC’s influence.  Here are 5, to name a few:

1. RC taught me that you cannot divorce history and philosophy from Truth.  When asked a question, RC never gave a simple answer, yet he always provided a clear answer.  Questions of theology can not be divorced from the historical context that they emerged.  Answers in theology can not be expressed apart from sound, lucid logic.  Watching RC taught me to picture a theological answer in terms of a funnel.  The response starts at the top in the broadest and widest context but through careful thought it comes to a pointed and specific conclusion.  

2.  RC modeled before me amazing courage.  During days when his personal friends and colleagues in ministry were seeking to embrace the Church of Rome, RC stood strong.  He understood that the issue was not catholic unity, nor was it fellowship reduced to the basics.  RC saw that what was at stake is the Gospel.  The Roman Catholic Church denies the essence of the Gospel and in doing so denies God.  RC could see that when others could not. 

3.  On the heels of my respect for his courage was also my respect for RC’s immovable stance on justification of the sinner, by faith alone in Christ alone.  I doubt if there was a book, sermon or conference message that did not at least include some reference to this doctrine by which the Church stands or falls.  RC understood as the Bible clearly affirms that the only saving hope of us who are sinners is to receive by faith “not a righteousness of our own” by the very righteousness of God.

4.  Not far removed from the above points was also RC’s commitment to the inerrancy of the Scriptures.  I recall in my early Christian life hearing him refute the common saying, “The Bible says it; I believe it; and that settles it.”  RC would lovingly rebuke such ideas.  He would retort, “If the Bible says it, it is settled, whether you believe it or not.”  If we have no inerrant, authoritative, sufficient Scriptures we are lost in a quagmire of human ideas and speculation. 

5. Lastly, but not finally, RC taught me that an effective teacher and preacher could also communicate with children.  RC wrote some memorable children’s books including my favorite, The Priest With Dirty Clothes.  For a man that was steeped in such heady and deep doctrines of the Bible, he could penetrate that fog with a light that allowed even children to see the Truth with clarity.  That, I believe, is a rare skill. That is a teacher!

No doubt, it will be said repeatedly that Dr. Sproul was not perfect.  That is certainly true of him and us.  His perfection was earned and gained by Another who took his place. I could never understand his seemingly illogical stance of infant baptism.  I would marvel at a man with such profound understanding of Christian truth lose all sense of rational and Scriptural deduction on this issue.  But today as I pen these thoughts, what joy it is to know that RC is in the presence of his Savior and his daily maxim of Coram Deo, living in God’s presence has been fulfilled in everlasting joy.  For those of us who have believed the Gospel of grace, we will soon join him. You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore” (Psalm 16:11, ESV).




Friday, December 1, 2017

The Extraordinary Light of Scripture

In a great article by Dr. Michael Haykin entitled: Remembering the Ministry of William Bridge, printed in the Fall Edition of the publication, Jubilee,[1] Dr Haykin references some of the thoughts of Bridge in relation to our Christian adherence to the written Word of God in contrast to the subjective impressions and supposed leadings of the Holy Spirit.   The article is worth reading in it’s entirety.  Here are a few insightful quotes from a preacher from the 17th Century.

  • Impressions, for example, “though good, are not our daily food.”
  • Bridge admitted that God is indeed able to employ such to guide his people since the closure of the canon of the Scriptures, but essentially the written Word of God has replaced them, and they are to be viewed with great wariness.
  • “If Luther had hearkened to revelations and visions, and not kept close to the Scripture, what had become of his reformation?”
  • “Though God may sometimes lead a man in extraordinary ways, and work by ways and means extraordinary; yet if a man’s heart be drawn off from the ordinary means by what is extraordinary, it is not right.
  • In response to the Quakers who believed “if the Spirit that is in me, be the same Spirit with that which did write the Scripture, what need I wait on or be ruled by the word without, or the Scripture, any longer”, Bridge responded: “Because, although ye have the same Spirit which did write the Scriptures, yet you have not the same inspiration of the Spirit.”
  • [“T]his light of Scripture is the best light, the most excellent light; more excellent than that of revelations and visions; more excellent than that of dreams and immediate voices; more excellent than that of impressions; more excellent than that of the law and light within; more excellent than that of Christian experience, or that of divine providence, or that of human reason; more excellent than this pretended light (but in truth, darkness) of judicial astrology. Surely therefore it is the most excellent, safe and sure light in the world.”
  • Here is our exhortation: “Let it be your continual companion, going where you go; if you go into the fields, oh! let the word go with you; if into your calling, oh! let the Scripture and the written word of God be with you. Thus shall you take heed unto it, as to a light shining in a dark place.”


Emphasis mine!




[1] Pages 34-44