Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

10 Reasons Why You Should be Committed to Expository Preaching - #2 & #3



The introduction and first point can be read HERE.   Again I quote Witmer:

“The pastor should also be concerned to represent scriptura tota (the whole counsel of God) in his preaching ministry. The best way to provide this balanced diet is through the systematic expository preaching of the Scriptures.

2. It requires that the shepherd concern himself with the intent of the Divine author for every text. 

The Lord gives us the Scriptures with his purpose in mind. The faithful expositor will seek this purpose rather than yield to his own whims and impose his own agenda in the ministry of the Word.

3. It respects the integrity of the textual units given through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit

I point to the fact that no one ever thinks of teaching the textbook of any other science in any other way. What would be thought of the master who professed to teach a system of geometry or mechanics by commenting in a brilliant way on one and another apothegm selected from the author. Every text is within a context designed by the divine author. An effective preacher takes into account the larger textual unit, the context in the book as a whole, and its place in the overall span of biblical revelation. [Emphasis mine]

It's interesting to me that in no other discipline, a manual is read by jumping to and fro throughout the document. It is a very strange thing that we choose to treat the Scriptures with a presumption that we can do a better job at amassing the Lord's message than He did through the Divine Author!



___________________________________________________
[1] Shepherd Leader (pp. 142-146). P&R Publishing. Kindle Edition.



Monday, October 28, 2019

Where Can Women Teach? - Mary Kassian

Eight Principles for Christian Churches

This is a great article by Mary Kassian.  Mary originated in Edmonton, and has been a friend of Elk Point Baptist Church.  She is a profound theologian and gifted communicator.  Mary graduated from the faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine from the University of Alberta, Canada and has studied systematic theology at the doctoral level. She has taught courses at seminaries across North America, including Southern Baptist Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky.

THIS IS A VERY PRACTICAL, HELPFUL ARTICLE.

The way I determine if teaching in a specific religious venue to a coed audience honors male headship is by trying to determine how closely that particular situation mimics the nature, role, and function of a church father in governing and providing public doctrinal instruction for the local-church family.
In particular, I try to pin down where the venue sits on the following eight continuums. The more a teaching venue leans toward the left (the first part of each pairing), the less likely it is that the venue is an appropriate one for me to provide coed instruction. The more the speaking venue leans toward the right (the second part of each pairing), the more likely it is that I might be a helpful teacher in this context.
  1. Context: congregational (church) ⟶ non-congregational. Is this the local church, or is it not exactly church?

To read more of Mary's article, CLICK HERE.

10 Reasons Why You Should be Committed to Expository Preaching #1

My associate pastor and I meet weekly for study, mentoring and prayer.  This year we are reading and discussing Timothy Witmer's book: The Shepherd Leader.   In Chapter 6, entitled Shepherds Feed the Sheep, Witmer provides a compelling argument for expository preaching.  

What is expository preaching?  There are many good definitions available but I prefer Bryan Chappell's:

"The main idea of an expository sermon the topic, the divisions of that idea, main points, and the development of those divisions, all come from truths the text itself contains. No significant portions of the text is ignored. In other words, expositors willingly stay within the boundaries of the text and do not leave until they have surveyed its entirety with its hearers." [1]

Here is Witmer's first point:

“The pastor should also be concerned to represent scriptura tota (the whole counsel of God) in his preaching ministry. The best way to provide this balanced diet is through the systematic expository preaching of the Scriptures. Verse-by-verse preaching from whole books of the Bible serves many purposes, including the following:


1. It identifies exactly what is the heart of the Christian message.

“We are not expounding a passage from either secular literature or a political speech or even a religious book, let alone our own opinions. No, our text is invariably taken from God’s Word.” 

People can hear about politics, the environment, or the economy anywhere, and by people who are likely to be better qualified in these categories. What the sheep need is the food that their Good Shepherd provides in the inspired revelation of his Word." [2]




____________________________________
2. Shepherd Leader (pp. 142-146). P&R Publishing. Kindle Edition.


Saturday, October 26, 2019

Forcing Yourself To Sin - 1 Samuel, Part 23



The time has finally arrived to return to the study.  My joy in studying 1 Samuel has been set aside for other joys of study.  In this book, God has “relented” and Saul is king of Israel.  The prophet Samuel has given Israel a serious warning about their obedience to God in 1 Samuel 12. When we read Samuel’s speech one should tremble.  His concluding words are:

Only fear the Lord and serve him faithfully with all your heart. For consider what great things he has done for you. But if you still do wickedly, you shall be swept away, both you and your king.”” (1 Samuel 12:24–25, ESV)

With the echoing words of “obedience” ringing in our ears we read a story of a military campaign of Saul. Two thousand men went with Saul and one thousand, his son, to enter into a battle with the Philistines. We read that “Jonathan defeated the garrison of the Philistines that was at Geba . . ..”[1]  

Immediately Saul proclaimed the victory (as if it was his own) and warned the nation of a possible counter-attack. He was right! “And the Philistines mustered to fight with Israel, thirty thousand chariots and six thousand horsemen and troops like the sand on the seashore in multitude. They came up and encamped in Michmash, to the east of Beth-aven.” (1 Samuel 13:5, ESV).

The Israelites were trapped and terrified. Saul was waiting for Samuel to come and offer sacrifices to the Lord. The people were losing confidence in Saul. They observed their king’s apprehension and fear, and they fled.  Saul “took the bull by the horns” and offered burnt offerings.  “In addition to disobeying Samuel’s instructions, Saul is not qualified to make this offering. He ignores the law and places himself above God’s priest, showing that he is unfit to lead God’s people.”[2]

Saul’s confession is poignant: “So I forced myself, and offered the burnt offering.”[3]

Samuel rebukes Saul: “Now your kingdom shall not continue. The Lord has sought out a man after his own heart, and the Lord has commanded him to be prince over his people, because you have not kept what the Lord commanded you.”[4]  This affords us an insight into the future.  It also sets the interpretative key to what it means to be “a man after his [God’s] own heart.”  This is a man who has a heart to obey God.  Saul then proceeded to confront the Philistines.

Obedience is a key theme in this story so far.  Blessing and cursing rested upon Saul and Israel’s obedience. Because of disobedience Saul would forfeit to reign.  Saul knew better.  His heart knew the terms and conditions.  But we read these terrifying words: “So I forced myself [to sin].” 

Is it not the ultimate self-condemnation to proceed against your own scruples – your own sense of right and wrong?  As Matthew Henry comments: He went against his own conscience “perhaps boasting that he had broken through his convictions and got the better of them, or at least thinking this extenuated his fault, that he knew he should not have done as he did, but did it with reluctancy. Foolish man! To think that God would be well pleased with sacrifices offered in direct opposition both to his general and particular command.”[5]

How did Saul force himself to move against his own sense of right and wrong? The answer is rationalization!  And Saul said, “When I saw that the people were scattering from me, and that you did not come within the days appointed, and that the Philistines had mustered at Michmash,” (1 Samuel 13:11b, ESV).  Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it?  The army is defecting and tardy Samuel was late. To save the day he had to do something; perhaps even be rewarded for his insightful initiative. Within his reasoning there’s a hint of blame.

When God has spoken, human logic, public opinion, or even social pressure fails to absolve the sinner.  I have witnessed the spiritual wreck of students who rationalized that it was an economy of effort to co-habit with the opposite gender.  I have painfully observed the marriage of a Christian to a non-Christian because he or she was lonely. I have heard of the rationalization to steal from one’s boss because he or she owes it to them.  I have experienced the pull to disregard one’s convictions because I don’t want to offend. I have seen the compromise of spiritual priorities in the home because children want to participate in such good activities as sport and recreation.

For God’s people, He was looking for that obedient king – that one who would take on the headship of His people with righteousness and perfection.  A king who would prove to be better than Saul and even better than David.  This king truly represent God and would  establish your offspring forever, and build your throne for all generations.’ ” Selah” (Psalm 89:4, ESV).

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end, on the throne of David and over his kingdom, to establish it and to uphold it with justice and with righteousness from this time forth and forevermore. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do this.” (Isaiah 9:6–7, ESV)

We are to bow before God’s king – King Jesus.  No more rationalization.  No more interference by human logic. Bow in humble submission.  It is there we find justice and grace, righteousness and mercy, holiness and forgiveness.







[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Sa 13:3). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[2] Barry, J. D., Mangum, D., Brown, D. R., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Ritzema, E., … Bomar, D. (2012, 2016). Faithlife Study Bible (1 Sa 13:9). Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.
[3] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Sa 13:12). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[4] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Sa 13:14). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Monday, October 21, 2019

Your Party Lost, Now What?


How should a Christian respond when your party of choice fails to achieve the electoral vote?  As a Christian you probably voted for the party that best represented your values.  You probably sought to see leaders of integrity and great character form the government.  You probably were deeply concerned about issues that intersect very closely with your Christian values.  But your party of choice failed to achieve the results you desperately hoped for.

For the weeks up to the election day you prayed and held out with great faith that “all the inhabitants of the earth are accounted as nothing, and he does according to his will among the host of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand or say to him, “What have you done?”” (Daniel 4:35, ESV).  You are convinced that “… the Most High rules the kingdom of men and gives it to whom he will and sets over it the lowliest of men.’” (Daniel 4:17b, ESV).  It is your respected opinion that the wrong party has been given power and you know that this power ultimately came from the hand of your sovereign God. You say with Habakkuk, “You who are of purer eyes than to see evil and cannot look at wrong . . . ” (Habakkuk 1:13a, ESV).  Habakkuk’s concern is yours: how can a holy righteous God ordain evil in the accomplishment of His will?

A careful survey of the Bible is replete with examples of God using wicked agents to accomplish His will. And in all that, He does not sin, nor is He guilty of evil.  Not only will God use unrighteous people to accomplish His ends and His goals, He will judge them in righteousness for their wickedness.  God used the wicked nation of Assyria to bring judgment on Israel. “Woe to Assyria, the rod of my anger; the staff in their hands is my fury!” (Isaiah 10:5, ESV).  And He would judge Assyria after they had done what He intended. “When the Lord has finished all his work on Mount Zion and on Jerusalem, he will punish the speech of the arrogant heart of the king of Assyria and the boastful look in his eyes.” (Isaiah 10:12, ESV)

God has a purpose and a goal that is bigger than us when He permits a government to lead a nation that is inherently unrighteousness.  God says to the voters in any election, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.” (Isaiah 55:8–9, ESV)

So the first response of the Christian voter who is disappointed in an election is to worship. That’s what Habakkuk did, recorded in Chapter 3.  More specifically he fell to his knees and proclaimed:

Though the fig tree should not blossom, nor fruit be on the vines, the produce of the olive fail and the fields yield no food, the flock be cut off from the fold and there be no herd in the stalls, yet I will rejoice in the Lord; I will take joy in the God of my salvation.” (Habakkuk 3:17–18, ESV)
The second response of the Christian voter is to “Fear God. Honor the emperor.”[1]  One should tremble in fear that they not malign the Sovereign of the Universe who has displayed His will in the nation. And we should honor the new leader.  As the Apostle Paul would entreat us, “I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.”[2]  Did you see that: Prayers, intercessions AND THANKSGIVINGS!  Honor and respect for the new Prime Minister of Canada would lead us not to passivity, but to respectful conversation.  Honor to our authority leads us to speak candidly on issues and speak politely.  Never is there an example in the Bible, from Daniel, to Jesus, to Paul who spoke to kings and rulers with dishonor and disrespect.  Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.” (Ephesians 4:29, ESV)

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” (Romans 13:1, ESV)

Let us rejoice and be thankful that the will of our good and sovereign God has been evidenced in this Canadian electoral process. And if the result is mystifying and disappointing to the Christian voter, they can take hope that “no purpose of Yours can be thwarted.”[3]








[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Pe 2:17). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (1 Ti 2:1–2). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[3] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2016). (Job 42:2). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

I Would Like To Tell You What I Think of Jesus

Whenever Jesus acted it was entirely unique.

  • When he taught at the Sermon on the Mount we read, “And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching, for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.” (Matthew 7:28–29, ESV)
  • When Jesus taught in his home town of Nazareth, the people remarked in astonishment, “…“Where did this man get this wisdom and these mighty works?” (Matthew 13:53–54, ESV)
  • Even when the people saw him confront the demonic world we read, “And they were all amazed and said to one another, “What is this word? For with authority and power he commands the unclean spirits, and they come out!”” (Luke 4:36, ESV)
  • When his enemies tried to trick him in religious debates like paying taxes, we read: “Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they marveled at him.” (Mark 12:17, ESV)
  • When answering an inquiring rich ruler, Mark comments: “. . .  And after that no one dared to ask him any more questions.” (Mark 12:34, ESV)
  • When the Levitical priestly guards heard His Gospel invitation, they said, “No one ever spoke like this man!”” (John 7:46, ESV)  
  • When in judgement by Pilate, we read: “But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:5, ESV)
  • Even at his death, a centurion remarked: “When the centurion and those who were with him, keeping watch over Jesus, saw the earthquake and what took place, they were filled with awe and said, “Truly this was the Son of God!”” (Matthew 27:54, ESV)

Verse 1[A[
I would love to tell you
What I think of Jesus
Since I found in Him
A friend so strong and true
I would tell you how
He changed my life completely
He did something
That no other friend could do


Chorus
No one ever cared for me like Jesus
There's no other friend so kind as He
No one else could take the sin
And darkness from me
O how much He cared for me


Verse 2
All my life was full of sin
When Jesus found me
All my heart was full
Of misery and woe
Jesus placed His strong
And loving arms around me
And He led me in the way
I ought to go


Verse 3
Ev'ry day He comes to me
With new assurance
More and more I understand
His words of love
But I'll never know
Just why He came to save me
Till someday I see
His blessed face above

________________________________________________
A. Charles Frederick Weigle, No One Ever Cared For Me Like Jesus, Public Domain









Monday, September 23, 2019

Scripture Interprets Scripture

Today I was hung up in my exegetical work of John 7:37-38,

“On the last day of the feast, the great day, Jesus stood up and cried out, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’ ” 

Whose heart will the river flow come out? Traditional, eastern interpretation says that the recipients heart will outflow living waters. Contemporary, western interpretation says that it’s Christ’s heart. Both views claim linguistic and biblical proof. Grammatically the difference is punctuation (not in the original). Both appear equal in their claim. Both appear right.

Then I read John 4:13–14 (ESV): 

Jesus said to her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.

There you see, three chapters earlier, Jesus explained that both views are right - at the same time. Living water flows out of Him to the believer; and then flows out of the believer.

Perhaps the ambiguity of John 7:37-38 is intentional because Jesus already interpreted it for us.

Scripture interprets Scripture!

Sola Scriptura! SDG!