Search This Blog

Showing posts with label God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label God. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2026

There Is A Complexity to God’s Love That Often Escapes Our Notice

 

From ‘The Difficult Doctrine of God’s Love,’ by D.A. Carson[1]

There is a reality that exists among Christians and non-Christians alike and it is to flatten the the love of God into one definition. We know this reality in everyday life if we think about it. When I say that I love my wife, no one in their right mind thinks that I love others in the same way. And when I say that I love my children, no one thinks that I love them the same as my wife and the same as I do to my fellow man.

 

Carson is helpful here. Note that he shows 5 ways that the Bible speaks of God’s love. “I draw your attention to five distinguishable ways the Bible speaks of the love of God. This is not an exhaustive list, but it is heuristically[2] useful.”

 

Some Different Ways the Bible Speaks of the Love of God

 

1)        The peculiar love of the Father for the Son, and of the Son for the Father. 

2)        God’s providential love over all that he has made

3)        God’s salvific stance toward his fallen world. God so loved the world that he gave his Son (John 3:16).

4)        God’s particular, effective, selecting love toward his elect

5)        Finally, God’s love is sometimes said to be directed toward his own people in a provisional or conditional way conditioned, that is, on obedience.

 

Carson will warn us not to separate these aspects into permanent, independent boxes as if “each were hermetically sealed off from the other.” Although they are to be distinguished, they are not to be divided. The character of God’s simplicity does not permit that. Their uniqueness does help us resolve some problems, though.

 

A common occasion that I have dealt with is with the familiar John 3:16. Many times, as the argument goes, this verse is pitted against verses like 1 Thessalonians 1:4[3]. If you treat both aspects of God’s love as being the same, you are led to believe the entire world is God’s elect and that being so leads us to universalism; to heresy. The discussion avoids the truth that God is speaking of a different aspect to His love in each case (Note #3 and #4 above).

 

This distinguishing of God’s love will help us avoid common clichés. Carson notes these 2:   

 

a)        “God’s love is unconditional.” But this cannot apply to #5.

b)        “God loves everyone exactly the same way.” And this cannot apply to #4.

 

Carson notes that “it is clear that what the Bible says about the love of God is more complex and nuanced than what is allowed by mere sloganeering.” This requires us as readers of Scripture to identify the aspect of God’s love that is being spoken of in Scriptural text.

“Christian faithfulness entails our responsibility to grow in our grasp of what it means to confess that God is love.”

What are some implications for the careful Bible reader?

A.       Avoid Sentimentalism: The reader must avoid reducing God's love to a single cliché, such as "God loves everyone the same way". While God loves the world in a salvific sense (3), that is distinct from his peculiar, effective love for the elect (4).

 

B.       Be balanced in your understanding of God’s love. The reader cannot pick one aspect to the exclusion of others. They must be held together to form a balanced, biblical picture, even when they seem difficult to reconcile (e.g., the tension between the unconditional nature of election and the conditional nature of obedience-based love).

C.      Context is King: The careful reader must pay attention to the specific biblical context to understand which aspect of love is being discussed. For example, a passage discussing obedience-based love (5) should not be read as a definition of salvation-by-works, nor should a text on salvific love (3) be used to deny the reality of elective love (4).

 

D.      Integrate with Other Attributes: God's love must not be divorced from his other perfections—holiness, sovereignty, and wrath. Understanding this ensures that the reader does not create a "God" who is merely a doting, harmless figure, but one who is both righteous and loving.

 

E.        Pastoral and Personal Application: Understanding these aspects properly brings both assurance and a call to obedience. It allows believers to rest in the secure, effective love of God (4) while simultaneously understanding the call to remain in His love through obedience (5)





[1] https://media.thegospelcoalition.org/documents/carson/2000_difficult_doctrine_of_the_love_of_God.pdf

[2] a common-sense rule (or set of rules) intended to increase the probability of solving some problem

[3] For we know, brothers loved by God, that he has chosen you,

 


Friday, April 17, 2026

Where Does the Christian Receive Psychē Counselling?


Where do we seek help for matters of the soul? Or perhaps a better question at this point is, “What are matters of the soul?”  I submit there are at least 7[1]:


1.      Heart motives and desires — What do you love most? (idolatry vs. worship of God; disordered affections, cravings, lusts of the flesh—see 1 John 2:15-17; James 4:1-3; Ezekiel 14:1-8).

2.      Thoughts and beliefs — Unbelief, lies we tell ourselves, faulty thinking patterns (Romans 12:2; 2 Corinthians 10:5; Ephesians 4:17-24).

3.      Emotions/affections — Anxiety/worry (unbelief—Matthew 6:25-34; Philippians 4:6-7), anger (bitterness, unforgiveness—Ephesians 4:31-32), fear, guilt, shame, despair, or joyless living.

4.      Will and behaviors — Sinful actions and habits that flow from the heart (e.g., lying, stealing, sexual immorality, laziness, addiction-like patterns—Galatians 5:19-21; Colossians 3:5-10).

5.      Relational sins — Pride, selfishness, manipulation, lack of love, unforgiveness, or idolatry of people/approval (Philippians 2:3-8; Ephesians 4:25-5:2).

6.      Responses to suffering — How we interpret and respond to trials, loss, abuse, or hardship (whether with faith/trust or with grumbling, self-pity, or resentment—see James 1; 1 Peter 4-5; Psalm 119).

7.      Sanctification issues — Lack of repentance, weak faith, prayerlessness, neglect of the Word, or failure to abide in Christ (John 15; Romans 6; Colossians 3:1-17).

The ACBC[2] standard of doctrine states: “God created the human person with a physical body and an immaterial soul, each possessing equal honor and essential to humanity.  The Bible depicts the soul as that which motivates the physical body.”[3]  I contend that secular society and secular approaches cannot deal with matters of the soul.  Unfortunately, our culture has created a discipline called psychology. "Psychology" derives it’s meaning from the Greek roots psyche (soul, mind, or breath) and logia (study, discourse, or science), literally meaning the "study of the soul." Sadly, this is a misnomer for this is not a field that secular psychology can legitimately enter.

ACBC’s official philosophy is “We recognize that secular attempts to answer the ultimate questions of psychology and counseling (i.e., Who is man? Why do people do what they do? How do people change? Why should a person change?) fall short in their answers since they do not acknowledge the reality of a personal God in whose presence mankind is always functioning and developing.”[4] Biblical counsellors would dismiss secular approaches to mankind’s soul because its theories are fundamentally flawed in its anthropology. It is flawed in matters of root causes. It is impotent in bringing lasting change to a person.  Some might even suggest, as I do, that secular psychology as co-opted the Biblical approach.

The Bible could not be clearer” “Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on his law he meditates day and night.” (Psalm 1:1–2, ESV)

Recently in a Podcast[5] entitled ‘Evaluating Clinically Informed Counselling,’ the participants provided a helpful checklist of areas we should look for, as Christians, to receive trustworthy counsel for matters of the soul. Paraphrasing their advice, here are 4 questions to ask prior to seeking counsel for your soul:

1.      What is the source of the problem? Is it a physical matter? Can it be examined, tested, measured, etc., organically or is it a matter of the soul? There is no blood test for anxiety. There is no imaging data on grief. You can perform a biopsy on depression. Ed Welch’s framework is helpful: moral/spiritual problems need soul care; non-moral physical problems need medical attention. Even in physical suffering, the heart response (trust vs. despair, gratitude vs. grumbling) remains a soul matter (see James 1; 1 Peter 4–5). [6] 

2.      What is the methodology of the counsellor? If it is matters of the soul, do they lean on humanistic theories or do they hold firmly to the sufficiency of Scripture? 2 Peter 1:3–5 (ESV)

3 His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, 4 by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire. 5 For this very reason, make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with knowledge,”

See also: 2 Timothy 3:16-17, Psalm 19:7-9, and Psalm 119:05

3.      Who is promoting the system of counselling? Where do you go to get it? The Bible says, “if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth.” (1 Timothy 3:15, ESV) Is this counselling service a ministry of, or under the Church? Biblical counselling is essentially Christian discipleship. The call to discipleship is a corporate call. To ensure accountability and authenticity in service, Biblical counselling ministries ought to at the very least an appendage of the Church.

4.      Lastly, what is the role of that counsellor? The Biblical counsellor’s mandate is clear: “Him we proclaim, warning everyone and teaching everyone with all wisdom, that we may present everyone mature in Christ.” (Colossians 1:28, ESV). Techniques like cognitive-behavioral methods, talk therapy focused on self-esteem, or trauma processing frameworks detached from biblical categories may offer short-term coping tools but often bypass or contradict the need for repentance, forgiveness, and Christ-centered hope. The word “warning” in Colossians 1:28 is the Greek word νουθετέω noutheteō meaning to admonish, exhort, admonish, give instruction.[7] The Biblical counsellor is essentially a Biblical expositor, and the goal is Christlikeness.

Secular ‘psychology’ produces temporary symptoms of relief or behavioral modification through common grace[8] observations, but it cannot produce heart-level transformation. Only the Holy Spirit working through God's Word can do that.

The soul is not a separate “ghost in the machine” but the motivating, directing center of the whole person (body + soul = embodied soul). It encompasses the heart (kardia), mind (nous), affections/desires, will, thoughts, emotions, motivations, and worship. Proverbs 4:23 is often cited: “Keep your heart with all diligence, for from it flow the springs of life.” Problems “of the soul” are ultimately heart-level issues—rooted in relationship to God, sin, idolatry, unbelief, or responses to suffering—that require the gospel, the Holy Spirit, repentance, faith, and ongoing sanctification for real change.[9]

Puritan clergy in the 16th and 17th centuries were frequently referred to as "physicians of the soul" or "soul-doctors".[10] They believed that just as a physical doctor treats the body, a minister should diagnose and treat spiritual diseases, such as sin, anxiety, or spiritual apathy, through personalized guidance.

 

 

 



[1] xAI, *Grok 3* (AI language model), accessed April 17, 2026, https://x.com/i/grok/share/650cfd9c3f4340969b3bc993a08c129a

[2] https://biblicalcounseling.com/

[3] https://nebraskagospel.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ACBC_Beliefs_And_Values.pdf

[4] https://biblicalcounseling.com/

[5] From Truth in Love: TIL 562: Is the Clinically Informed Biblical Counseling the Third Generation (feat. Ernie Baker), Apr 6, 2026

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/truth-in love/id1003845008?i=1000759500387&r=616

[6] https://www.biblicalcounselingcoalition.org/2014/09/25/how-can-christians-tell-the-difference-between-a-spiritual-issue-and-a-physical-one/

[7] Thomas, R. L. (1998). In New American Standard Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek dictionaries : updated edition. Foundation Publications, Inc.

[8] “God’s common grace that sustains the life and breath of every unbeliever (cf. Dan. 5:23) and that permits the unregenerate to partake of the multifaceted pleasures and blessings of life in God’s creation (cf. Ecclesiastes) is, indeed, a manifestation of God’s good and gracious character.” - https://seminary.bju.edu/theology-in-3d/the-basis-of-gods-common-grace/

[9] https://nebraskagospel.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ACBC_Beliefs_And_Values.pdf

[10] http://tiny.cc/pr02101 

Friday, January 10, 2025

The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.


The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

This Tree mentioned in Genesis 2:15-17 (“The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”) is set apart from another Tree, named The Tree of Life. The latter clearly depicts immortality or everlasting life. It is mentioned again in Revelation 2:7; 22:2, 14, and 19.  Understanding the role the the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (The Knowledge Tree), is more complex.

Common understanding of The Knowledge Tree is that it is simply the ‘test-tree’ as to whether Adam and Eve will choose to obey God. Eat it “you shall surely die.” We could leave the argument there. It is a ‘test-tree’ so to speak. But the Scriptures give this Knowledge Tree more importance than that.

The Knowledge Tree occupied centre stage with the Tree of Life, in the centre of the Garden (Genesis 2:9b). Satan’s temptation includes a concept more that just a ‘test-tree.’ “ For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5). The eating of it is more than an act of rebellion but is an act that invites a knowledge of good and evil. There appears to be a wisdom benefit. That benefit is affirmed by our God. When Adam and Eve hide and God comes looking for them, they tell God they are hiding because they recognize that they are naked. God said to them,  Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten of the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?” The fact that they knew they were naked alerts God to the reality that they ate from the Knowledge Tree.

A popular understanding of this Tree is found in the ESV Study Bible notes, “Of these possibilities, the last is the most likely: by their obedience or disobedience the human couple will come to know good and evil by experience.”[1] This strikes as a plausible explanation. To disobey God is to experience evil and the wages of evil is death (Romans 6:23). But that does not satisfy my enquiry, particularly considering Satan’s challenge: “you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

Someone may argue that Satan is just deceiving, lying, using false information. But the narrative does not support that. In v3:7 we are told that their eyes were opened; and in v3:22 God says, “Man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil.”  So, my point is that although the eating of Knowledge Tree was a test, it also produced an effect. Adam and Eve become something like God in knowledge. The question is like what? Reading Christopher Watkin’s book: “Biblical Critical Theory,” he offers a better answer.


“The way in which God himself knows good and evil is not simply that he recognizes what is already good and already evil independently of his judgment, for the very good reason that nothing exists independently of his judgment. God knows good and evil in the sense that he has the authority to decide what is good and what is evil because his moral character is woven into the very fabric of the creation order, as we saw in the chapter on the creation of the universe.”[2]

 

When Adam and Eve disobeyed God, they entered a realm of wisdom that assumed they had the authority to decide what was right and what was wrong. Is this not the case today with all of Adam’s children? We think we can be the arbitrators of truth, what is good and what is evil. Mark Brians affirms this in his article: “Two Trees in Eden and What They Mean:”

 

“Rather, the knowledge of good and evil suggests authority to rule and exercise judgement. It is what God does throughout the creation cycle. He sees what he has made and declares it “good” (e.g., Genesis 1:10 or “very good,” Genesis 1:31 or “not good” (Genesis 2:18).”[3]

 

When our progenitors sinned, they not only bequeathed to us a sin nature bent on disobedience to God our Sovereign Creator, but they also transferred to us the insane wisdom that assumed we could figure out, in ourselves, what is right and what is wrong. Rather than draw us into closer relationship with God (like Him) “knowing good and evil,” only serves to separate them from him.” [4]  Imagine the horror: people with a nature perpetually leaning toward disobedience to God, who at the same time take it upon themselves to determine what is right and what is wrong; what is good and what is evil?

This is in fact what has occurred. Our culture has decided that we can figure out what is acceptable and what is not. We decide whose life is worth keeping. We decide what gender we are. We decide what constitutes marriage. The list seems endless. We who are dependent created beings, utterly affected by sin in every dimension of life have believed the lie that we can decide what is good and what is evil. It is insane.

 

Before Jesus went to the Cross, to suffer for the sins of all who would believe in Him, Pilate questioned him. Pilate was in a place of political power. Pilate was one who was commissioned to make judgments on various matters. Listen to part of the discourse:


Then Pilate said to him, “So you are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this purpose, I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.” Pilate said to him, “What is truth? (John 18:37-38). Previously before His disciples, the people “of the truth,” Jesus said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). It is in union with Christ that truth can be found. Determinations of right and wrong, good, and evil are only assured through the Person and the Word of Jesus. Truth is anchored in God's nature, personality, and attributes. Because God is truth, he defines what truth is. This means that truth is objective, not relative. There is no such thing as “your truth” or “my truth.” There is only God’s Truth.

 

God never intended humankind to eat of this Tree. It was impossible for humans to bear the responsibility to be the determiners of right and wrong.





[1] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 54). Crossway Bibles.

[2] Biblical Critical Theory: How the Bible's Unfolding Story Makes Sense of Modern Life and Culture by Christopher Watkin

[4] Wenham, G. J. (1987). Genesis 1–15 (Vol. 1, p. 74). Word, Incorporated.

 

Sunday, November 24, 2024

Social Justice - It's Not What It Seems To Be

When you hear the term “social justice” what do you think?  For many of us it sounds like an honorable and important desire in our society.  Do you not desire justice in this world?  The technical term “social justice” that drives our politics, controls our education systems, and informs society does not mean what you think it means. 

If Jesus was ministering on earth today, He would be guilty of “social injustice”.  He chose 12 Jewish men as His apostles.  He did not consider racial or gender representation. He would certainly be in error to give to one servant 5 talents, to another 3 and yet another 1.  His unequivocable stance that marriage is between one man and one woman for life would be subject to tremendous criticism. His view of the family would be another certainly make Him unpopular.  In almost every major point He would be guilty of violating contemporary “social justice” values.

What is “social justice”?

William H. Young[1] defines “state redistribution of advantages and resources to disadvantaged groups to satisfy their rights to social and economic equality.”  The problem is the little word “equality”.  Within the social justice topic equality does not mean equal worth or dignity. Now that might mean that to you as you use it, but that is not what it means in contemporary social science.  It means equality in outcome.  For instance, in economic Marxism, equality means everyone has the same amount of wealth.  In this worldview, also called cultural Marxism, everyone has equality of outcome.

Christians would certainly believe in “equality of opportunity”, but “equality of outcome” is a different species. Equality of opportunity never promises equality in the outcome.  A simple illustration of equality of outcome might be this:

·         If you have 10 dogs and 10 cats applying for a job; and you only need 10.
·         Equality of opportunity is that all cats and dogs that want the job can apply.
·         Equality of outcome is that no matter the qualification, 5 cats and 5 dogs will be selected to get equal outcome.

 Further to that definition within some of the subsets of the social justice movement, if cats come from a circumstance where they have been mistreated and marginalized, the outcome will be manipulated so that there are 7 cats and 3 dogs.

In the 2020 US election, Kamala Harris[2] is quoted in a video saying,

“It’s about giving people the resources and support they need so that everyone can be on equal footing, and then compete on equal footing”, (so far most of us would agree, but then she adds) “equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place”.

That is cultural Marxism that our society calls “social justice.” The reason this is important issue is because it is the default worldview in our governments, schools and slowly creeping into the Church. Christians need to be informed and warned. 

What is Biblical justice?

As Christians we disagree with this social justice theory, but God forbid if we fail to recognize the need for justice in this world.   The Bible is not silent on the need for justice:

·         Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute.” (Psalm 82:3, ESV)

·         learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause.” (Isaiah 1:17, ESV)

·         He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?” (Micah 6:8, ESV)

·         My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory.” (James 2:1, ESV) 

To suggest that a Christian ought to not be concerned about justice is like saying we shouldn’t be concerned about holiness or righteousness.  Biblical Justice in its simplest form, means to set things right.  Jesus is our example. Jesus pursued justice. He physically and spiritually ministered to the needs around Him.  Healing the leper in Matthew 8 and caring for the woman caught in adultery in John 8 are just a few examples.  Luke’s Gospel emphasizes that the ministry of Jesus was to the marginalized, the poor, the despised in society.

The standard of justice is God Himself.  The only reason there is any concept of justice in our world is because our holy, righteous Creator God imparted the notion to His creation.  Hear God’s Word:

·         “The Rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just and upright is he.” (Deuteronomy 32:4, ESV)

·         Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; steadfast love and faithfulness go before you.” (Psalm 89:14, ESV)

God defines justice.  All His ways are just. 

In discussion with someone recently I appealed to them to “think Christianly” about social issues.  What do I mean by that?  Here are 7 principles to help you think “Christianly” about social issues.

7 BIBLICAL GUIDELINES TO THINK “CHRISTIANLY” ABOUT SOCIAL ISSUES

1. To think “Christianly” places ultimate blame for all injustice in wickedness of human heart.  The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?” (Jeremiah 17:9, ESV).  The heart of the problem is the heart. The very first sin committed after Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden was murder induced by jealousy and envy.  The sobering condemnation of Scripture is, “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.”” (Romans 3:10–12, ESV).  Ultimately its not social groupings or institutions that cause injustice.  It is sin.  If the ultimate problem is sin, the ultimate solution is a Savior.

2. To think “Christianly” rightly defines the identity of all people in God.  The identity of the Christian is found in Christ. A familiar question of our day is, “How do you identify yourself?”  If I find my identity in the color of my skin, the gender of my being, the identifier of my culture and so on, I will always be discontent. 

Our primary thought, no matter who we meet is “this person is made in the image of God.” “Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness…” (Genesis 1:26a, ESV)  It is for that reason that God directed the value and the protection of human life. “And for your lifeblood I will require a reckoning: from every beast I will require it and from man. From his fellow man I will require a reckoning for the life of man. “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.” (Genesis 9:5–6, ESV).  All human nature is still under the terms and conditions of the Noahic covenant.  All human beings are by creation, precious, valuable, equal and of eternal worth. 

This does not mean that race, gender, culture is unimportant.  It does mean that it is less important. 

Likewise, those who are in Christ have a unique identity.  Every Christian regardless of race, color or gender is uniquely blessed by God, chosen in Christ, and predestined to be God’s son (don’t change the gender of that, ladies.). Every Christian, regardless, is redeemed, forgiven, guaranteed and eternal inheritance, sealed with the promise of the Holy Spirit (see Ephesians 1:3-14).

If you ultimately identify by your race, color, gender, etc., you will never be happy – you will never find satisfaction in Christ.

3. To think “Christianly,” true justice is motivated by love. It seems to me that modern social justice movements which on the surface seem to be promoting equality, respect, and fairness promote suspicion, hostility, labelling, motivated by envy, jealousy, anger, and resentment. This tells us the motivation is wrong. 

The Biblical worldview calls for Good Samaritan ethics which is to do good to all as you have opportunity.  The Biblical worldview calls to love even your enemies and those who despitefully use you. The Biblical worldview calls for love instead of retaliation. 

The Biblical response seems to me to “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:21, ESV).  Peter calls us who are Christians to a high standard; to be like Christ. “He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth. When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly.” (1 Peter 2:22–23, ESV)

Paul reminds us of one of the marks of a true Christian.  They, “repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.” (Romans 12:17, ESV).

4. To think “Christianly” responds to the plight of the oppressed.  Jeremiah’s letter to the exiles give to us great advice. “But seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare.” (Jeremiah 29:7, ESV).  I repeat from Isaiah, “learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause.” (Isaiah 1:17, ESV).  In God’s opinion, doing good includes seeking a just functioning of our society.

The Bible also implies that we focus on the known injustices in our communities. “As you have opportunity, do good.”  Do you speak up at coffee time when racist comments are made? Do you honor the women in your life? Do you honor the men in your life?  Will you have the courage to rebuke the multitude of jokes that demean genders and cultures?

Secondly the Bible (in Psalm 82 and Romans 13) places great responsibility on our civil leaders. This means praying for them, holding them to account and being involved in the political process is critical.  Hear these last inspired words of King David recorded in 2 Samuel 23:3–4 (ESV),

3 The God of Israel has spoken; the Rock of Israel has said to me: When one rules justly over men, ruling in the fear of God, 4 he dawns on them like the morning light, like the sun shining forth on a cloudless morning, like rain that makes grass to sprout from the earth.

 5. To think “Christianly” means we look at people differently.  From now on, therefore, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we once regarded Christ according to the flesh, we regard him thus no longer.” (2 Corinthians 5:16, ESV).  Christians don’t classify people in human categories. Before your saved you look and say, “That person is rich and privileged.  That person is not.”  Or we say, “That person is an embarrassment to society.  That person is not.”  Christians view all persons, created in the image of God and in need of salvation. 

Modern theories, called “critical theories” create categories and division.  Christians view people according to the Spirit.  Christians understand there are only two races: the race of Adam and the race of Christ.  Christians labor to call all people to the hope of the Gospel and to find their hope in Christ.

6. To think “Christianly” is to think of personal responsibility and accountability.  For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil.” (Ecclesiastes 12:14, ESV).  In the Bible there is no room to excuse sin because of the social circumstances you find yourself. The Bible emphasizes personal responsibility.  Each person is a moral agent accountable before God.  Any theory that seeks to ignore our personal responsibility is unbiblical.

7. To think “Christianly” in the ultimate sense is to remember that God who is perfect in justice is the final Judge.  Peter reminds us of those who live unjustly: “but they will give account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead.” (1 Peter 4:5, ESV). 

We hear the words of the Holy Spirit: “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.”” (Romans 12:19, ESV).

Biblical Justice is then treating others, in all areas of life, in such a way as to uphold God’s revealed standards of righteousness and holiness. It means to each of us, “as you have opportunity, do good.”  It means for our nation to uphold the same standard and punish wrongdoers and reward the injured accordingly.

Biblical Justice is opposed to and is opposed by most modern theories of social justice.   When you hear code words like ‘critical race theory”, “intersectionality”, “reproductive justice”, “economic justice”, “inclusiveness”, “diversity”, “privilege” and particularly the word “equality” be aware they may not mean what you think they mean.  I encourage you to test what you hear and ensure that it is inline with thinking “Christianly”?

Further Resources

1.     In June of 2018 several prominent evangelicals such as John MacArthur, Voddie Baucham, and so on met together draft a statement on Social Justice.  Tens of thousands of Churches or individuals have added their signature in approval.  It is called Statement on Social Justice and the Gospel.  I highly recommend it to you.  Just reading it will help you understand the issues.

2.       I also recommend the teaching of Voddie Baucham.  There are 2 presentations on YouTube that would be helpful:

a.       https://youtu.be/yEL7KtQ673w

b.       https://youtu.be/YFNOP2IqwoY

These presentations are based on his book: Fault Lines: The Social Justice Movement and Evangelicalism's Looming Catastrophe

3.     Anything Monique Duson, from the Center for Biblical Unity, produces is excellent. She has produced a small group Bible study entitled Reconciled, A Biblical Approach to Ethnic Unity. Here’s an example: https://youtu.be/YxZOSv-tMDs

4.       I’ve read several online articles that are helpful.  Here is a list:

a.       https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/faqs-christians-know-social-justice/

b.       https://www.liberty.edu/champion/2020/11/opinion-social-justice-is-not-the-same-as-biblical-justice/

c.       https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/why-all-christians-must-seek-public-justice/

d.       https://www.jarrodjones.com/2020/10/social-justice-vs-biblical-justice-7-ways-to-discern-the-truth/

e.       https://www.challies.com/book-reviews/is-white-fragility-a-helpful-resource-for-christians/

f.        https://alberta.lightmagazine.ca/2021/06/11/is-critical-race-theory-of-concern-in-canada-part-1/

g.       https://alberta.lightmagazine.ca/2021/06/18/part-2-how-far-can-we-agree-with-critical-race-theory/

h.       https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/critical-race-theory-part-1

i.         https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/critical-race-theory-part-2

 



[1] https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/academic_social_science_and_social_justice

[2] https://www.steveglaveski.com/blog/why-equality-of-outcome-is-a-bad-idea