It becomes a stunning
revelation to most people that most of the nation of Israel is in unbelief;
rejected by God (Romans 9:1-5). This is
the God that made many promises to this nation.
But we have learned that God has not been unfaithful because the
promises were misunderstood by many.
Many thought they applied to the whole nation, but they did not. They applied to the righteous seed, the
remnant, the elect (Romans 9:6-13). Is
God unrighteousness to be so particular and selective? No. It is within His holy and glorious nature
to have freedom of choice. Some He
chooses to save. Some are left to their
own choices, that will eventually harden them to the things of the Gospel
(Romans 9:14-18).
How can God condemn those He has sovereignly
left in their sin? If that’s God’s
choice, who is it that can change His mind?
Paul’s answer is that we need to be humbled before the infinite wisdom
of God.
“. . . Will what is molded say to its
molder, “Why have you made me like this?” Has the potter no right over the
clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for
dishonorable use?” (Romans 9:20–21, ESV).
As we can see in our Bibles, this is a
quote from the Old Testament. In Isaiah
29:16 (ESV) we read: “16You turn things upside down! Shall
the potter be regarded as the clay, that the thing made should say of its
maker, “He did not make me”; or the thing formed say of him who formed it, ‘He
has no understanding’?” And in Isaiah 45:9 (ESV) we
read, “9 ‘Woe to him
who strives with him who formed him, a pot among earthen pots! Does the clay
say to him who forms it, ‘What are you making?’ or ‘Your work has no handles’? ”
God’s Word reminds us
that we can err in several distinct ways.
They are:
a. A pot could say
that God did not make me; or
b. A pot could say
that God erred in the way He made me.
The pot in Paul’s illustration
is arrogantly complaining. The pot is
claiming to be wiser than the potter. But the question that is left in our minds is
this: “Has the potter no right over the clay . . .?”[1] Doesn’t God as sovereign
Creator have ultimate rights over His creation?
In fact the Apostle goes on to say, “Has the potter no right over the
clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for
dishonorable use?” (Romans 9:21, ESV).
Contextually (referring back to Romans 9:1-5), isn’t Paul saying that
God brought the entire nation of Israel into being. Does He not have the right to take some of
that nation and use them for “honorable” purposes? And does He not have the right to take the
other and use them for “dishonorable” purposes?
Again to expand this, doesn’t God have the
right to take an Isaac, a Jacob, and a Moses and fashion them for uses of
honor? And can He not take an Ishmael,
an Esau, and a Pharaoh and use them for dishonorable purpose? Is this not God’s right? “Out of the same original lump or mass He forms, in His holy sovereignty, one
man unto honor, and another unto dishonor, without in any respect violating
justice.”[2]
As Paul extends his question outside the
bounds of Israel to the person of Pharaoh, so we too can extend the thought to
a universal consideration. Therefore I
agree with this notation: “The honorable and dishonorable vessels in this
context represent those who are saved and unsaved. Paul affirms that humans are
guilty for their sin, and he offers no philosophical resolution as to how this
fits with divine sovereignty.”[3] Or also as stated here: “That
God should show mercy to any from the Adamic lump and create vessels of honor
from it is the kindness of grace; that others should become vessels for lesser
use is a matter of His sovereign prerogative and is itself a display of perfect
justice towards them.”[4]
This, of course, leaves us with a huge
tension. How can God do this and be
just? Dr. Douglass Moo’s advice is
important:
“The search for philosophical/theological
explanations of the relation between God’s sovereign decision making and human
responsibility is not wrong, but we must begin where Paul and the Bible begin:
a vision of a God who is absolutely free to make whatever decision he wants
about his creation. Paul would be the last to deny the importance of human
decisions. His repeated pleas to people to believe in Christ and to reject sin
reveal his belief in real human responsibility. Paul’s purpose, however, is not
to offer an explanation of how God’s sovereignty and human responsibility fit
together. He affirms both without resolving the tension between them.”[5]
In seeking to resolve the enigma between
God’s sovereignty and humanity’s free will, we will never get it right if we
don’t start with the assertion of God’s free will.
_____________________________________________
Previous Blogs on this topic:
1
|
Romans 9:1-2
|
|
2
|
Romans 9:3-5
|
|
3
|
Romans 9:6–9
|
|
4
|
Romans 9:6–13
|
|
5
|
Romans 9:13
|
|
6
|
Romans 9:14-16
|
|
7
|
Romans 9:17-19
|
|
8
|
Romans 9:20a
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
[1] The Holy Bible: English
Standard Version. (2001). (Ro 9:21). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
[2] Haldane, R. (1996). An
exposition of Romans (electronic ed., p. 490). Simpsonville, SC: Christian
Classics Foundation.
[3] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The
ESV Study Bible (p. 2173). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[4] Whitlock, L. G., Sproul, R. C., Waltke, B. K., & Silva, M.
(1995). The Reformation study Bible:
bringing the light of the Reformation to Scripture: New King James Version
(Ro 9:19). Nashville: T. Nelson.
[5] Moo, D. J. (2002). Encountering
the book of Romans : a theological survey (p. 153). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker
Academic.
No comments:
Post a Comment