Search This Blog

Friday, September 25, 2015

The Implications of Romans 9

Contrary to many Dispensational and Arminian viewpoints, Romans 9-11 is not parenthetical to Paul argument in this Letter to the Romans.  Paul has been arguing justification by faith in Jesus Christ.  If we are saved by the promise of free and gracious justification, it is a logical consideration: what of the Jews?  The Jewish believers in Rome needed to understand where their confidence would lie. 

The implications of this study of Romans 9 is profoundly opposed to the majority of evangelical media, books, prophecy conferences and congregations.  My experience is that an avoidance of this chapter and a faulty interpretation of this passage has led to faulty views of predestination, the promises of God to Israel, and Palestinian land claims.  Current views of election vigorously fight to keep man in control of his or her destiny.  Although there is truth to the moral responsibility of men and women; and although it is true that God at no times violates a person's will, rendering him or her a robot; it is profoundly true that the primary basis of every person's redemption in Christ is the sovereign electing mercies of God.  Election in itself saves no one; but no one will be saved apart from merciful and effectual choice of God. 

What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.” (Romans 9:14–16, ESV)

A second implication to a proper understanding of Romans 9 has to do with the promises of God to Israel.  The eternal promises given to Israel can only be claimed by those who are the elect within the ethnic nation.  “This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” (Romans 9:8, ESV).

"Even though many Jews have failed to believe, God’s promise to them has not failed, for there was never a promise that every Jewish person would be saved. It was never the case that all the physical children of Abraham were truly part of the people of God, for Gen. 21:12 teaches that the line of promise is traced through Isaac, not Ishmael."[1]

So when we read passages like Isaiah 43. “But now thus says the Lord, he who created you, O Jacob, he who formed you, O Israel: “Fear not, for I have redeemed you; I have called you by name, you are mine.” (Isaiah 43:1, ESV).  The only interpretation of promises like this (and there are myriads of them) is to apply this to believing, faithful Israel, i.e., the true Israel of God.

The third implications flows from the second.  John Piper states it well: "The promises made to Abraham, including the promise of the Land, will be inherited as an everlasting gift only by true, spiritual Israel, not disobedient, unbelieving Israel . . . Being born Jewish does not make one an heir of the promise—neither the promise of the Land nor any other promise."[2]

This is not a new revelation.  The prophets, according to Romans 9, saw clearly that not all Israel would be saved.  Only those faithful to their God can claim the promises of God. ". . . Only a remnant of them will be saved."[3]




[1] Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (p. 2173). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
[2] http://www.desiringgod.org/messages/israel-palestine-and-the-middle-east
[3] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2001). (Ro 9:27). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.

No comments: