Search This Blog

Showing posts with label pastors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pastors. Show all posts

Sunday, September 22, 2024

Did You Contribute to the Sin of Dr. Steven Lawson?

The Church is grieving. Many, many of us who have been beneficiaries of Dr. Lawson’s preaching and teaching are still reeling from the latest news of his moral failure. Many, many have commented appropriately to this shockwave. Many, many have rightly reminded us to “take heed to self, lest we too fall.”   I said to a dear friend, we are all within a half an inch of such shipwreck.

A question that needs to be considered in this is: “Have I contributed to this sin?”  

Before I write the next several sentences many of you readers will already begin, “Ya but.”  I caution you not to do that. If you at once launch into your rebuttal, you will not take seriously this question. Wrestle with this personally, please. “Have you contributed to this sin?”  This is not to minimize or evade the responsibility that Dr. Lawson is and must be held to. My contention is that many of us must recognize our contribution to this sin of Lawson’s and others in a comparable way.

Dr. Lawson has been part of a cadre of Evangelical (often Reformed minded) men and women who spend a gargantuan amount of time and energy on the Conference tours. If not there, they are producing books and study material at a supernatural rate. The Christian books stores and media outlets are replete with video and digital bible studies and courses. The ground supporting my question is this: Local churches have often made the conference, teaching ministries of such men and women indispensable to their ministry.

To be honest, I have contributed to the sin of Dr. Lawson. As a retired pastor I look back on many, many solutions to the local church teaching ministry satisfied by “parachuting” a big-name speaker in, via video, to teach my Sunday School class, Bible Study, or other ministry need. In fact, I know local churches that have become total dependent on the ability to import video teaching from these celebrated teachers.

We have committed two evils. We have demoted the necessity of the local church to develop teachers and preachers from within (Thus devaluing the doctrine of ecclesiology); and we have exalted the celebrity speakers to an unattainable pedestal.

Why must the local church default to importing celebrity teachers to meet the needs of the Sunday School class, Bible study or such like? Why must the local church default to importing the books, these people write, to meet the need of the moment? Why are men and women not being trained to open God’s Word before other believers and teach them the Bible? Why are men and women that have served Christ for many years incapable of following a simple pattern of hermeneutics and prayerfully teach their peers? Why are men and women being conditioned to demote the faithful preaching of their pastor (and elders, presumably) and relish in the conference ministry, the radio, TV ministries, the books and video series of these illuminaries?

A short story. My father was a Sabbatarian. As a young man he helped a fledgling church near the city of Glasgow, Scotland. He had two routes to go to church. One was lengthy and he would ride his bicycle. One was short but needed a ferry ride. One Sunday morning while crossing the ferry he was constrained to witness to the driver. He chose to start the conversation with, “Do you go to church?”  The ferryman answered, “How can I with the likes of you who keep me on this ferry.”  Now remember: No ya buts. My father’s conscience was pricked, and he never took the ferry again on the Lord’s Day. My father, to his credit, was able to see how his choices had aggravated the ferry man’s situation. Can you?

Why are there hundreds of conferences, books, video lessons and the like? Answer: because you and I demand them. It is the law of supply and demand. We have created celebrity pastors and teachers. One astute commentator wrote, “Every pastor should be at home at night with his wife.”  (Remember. No ya but.)  I have lived through T4G attended by thousands, TGCW attended recently by 9,000 women, Shepherds conference, Desiring God, Ligonier etc. etc.  I have also lived through the moral shipwreck and indiscretion of several of the speakers at such events.

What if Churches just said, enough! No more conferences. No more video lessons. No more book studies. No more! As of today, the people of God will look to their own pastors and elders for biblical preaching. As for today the people of God will encourage one another through the carefully handled Word of God, cutting it straight. As of today Sunday School (adult in mind) will see groups of disciples gathered reverently around their Bibles with paper, pen, and hearts open to receive God’s Word.

I have contributed to the sin of Dr. Lawson. Have you?

The local Church needs to embrace a robust Doctrine of Ecclesiology that makes much of the grace found in the preaching/teaching ministries of His “local” people. We have forsaken the primary and Biblical call upon the local Church and become reliant on the celebrity speaker to feed our people. It is not a burden these men and women ought to bear. We need to stop demanding it of them.

If you have considered this carefully and personally, now give me your “ya buts.”




Tuesday, August 5, 2014

I Hope Pastors, Teachers, Bible Study Leaders -- All Christians Will Read This!

This is part of a conversation, not a condemnation.  Please think with me.  I'll explain in a moment why I chose not to make this an attack on any particular person.   Take a look with me at a particular passage that we are all aware of.  It's found in Luke 24:13–35.  Click HERE to remind yourself of this story.

In verses 1-12, the human author recounts the resurrection of Jesus Christ.  This is obviously a momentous and victorious event.  Luke alone, tells the story of the two disciples walking along the Emmaus Road.  If you were going to provide teaching on this subject would the following appear acceptable to you?

  • Is the context about frustrated, disillusioned, discouraged disciples?
  • Is the point of the passage is to show that Jesus enters our world in order to bring peace?
  • Are there 3 main teaching points?  Are they:
    • A. To find the peace of Christ through His Presence you must "Behold"[1].  That is, you must lean and and look for Him in the midst of your crisis? 
    • B. To find the peace of Christ you must "take him home"?  That is, you have learned that these men were coming from a huge and momentous gathering of people in Jerusalem and are now on their way home.  To enjoy the manifestation of His Presence you must look for Him at home in the midst of your circumstance.
    • C. To find the peace that Christ gives you must ask Him to come into all the dimensions of your home (i.e. “But they urged him strongly, “Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over.” So he went in to stay with them.” (Luke 24:29, NIV)?
  • When you discovered in verse 16 that their eyes were kept from seeing Him, would you assume that this was because of some fault of their own?  And respectively when their eyes were opened in their home, was that because they had invited Jesus into all the rooms of their home? 
If you agreed with the bullet point 1, then I would certainly agree with you -- to a point.  Good start!  If you agreed with all the other bullet points, your are in company with a popular Christian speaker and author.  My question is this, "Why did the Holy Spirit inspire Luke to record this event?"

  • Did God want us to know how to encounter Jesus along life's road?
    • Is this a real-life parable that reminds us that along life's road Jesus comes along our sides, points us to the Bible and reveals Himself to us?
What is the exegetical message that comes to us today by the Spirit through His inspired Word?

  • Were the disciples not despondent because they did not understand the Old Testament?
  • Did not Jesus need to show them that their entire Scriptures pointed to Him as the Divine fulfillment?
  • Did not the disciples sense a deep stirring at His exposition?
  • Did this not provide direct eye-witness evidence to the resurrection of Christ?
  • Finally, is the point of the story, granted credibility when Luke records: “They got up and returned at once to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, assembled together and saying, “It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.” Then the two told what had happened on the way, and how Jesus was recognized by them when he broke the bread.” (Luke 24:33–35, NIV) 

So ... can we honestly assume that to preach a message based upon the bullet point in blue, is "rightly dividing the Word of God?" (2 Timothy 2:15).  

I cannot bring judgment on the speaker eluded to in this blog, nor the countless number that use the Bible this way.  The reason is that when I examine my old sermons I used to also allegorize the text.  It is a common fault.   Some of the great preachers of old did this often.  It doesn't make it right.

Brothers and sisters we are not story-tellers.  We are to expound and expose the text. The task of the preacher/teacher is clearly enunciated in Nehemiah 8:8 (NIV),

8 They read from the Book of the Law of God, making it clear and giving the meaning so that the people understood what was being read.

Brothers and sisters, give them the meaning of the text, not the meaning you'd like the text to say. I welcome your comments.



_____________________________________
1. Taken from the KJV: "And, behold, two of them went that same day . . .."

Thursday, February 21, 2013

1 Clement Chapters XLVI - LIX

First Epistle to the Corinthians

 Clement of Rome

Chapters XLVI – LIX
 

As noted by Ross Amy, this Epistle of Clement is really an exhortation or a sermon.  His sermon is to confront the sedition in Corinth.  He shows the congregation the tragedy of envy and what it does to relationships. He points out the blessings that came to the saints of the past that sought to obey Christ and also mimic Christ in these areas of relationships. He reminds his listeners that Christ is returning; and there comes with that resurrection and judgment. True faith ought to be evidenced by peace and love.

Clement’s approach is to point out the true order that Christ has established for the church. Implied is his warning that those who rise up in rebellion and rebelling against Christ.
 
The sadness of this situation is that it seems to be more grievous than what Paul dealt with in his First Letter to Corinth.  (Clement surely believed that this letter of Paul was inspired: “Truly, under the inspiration of the Spirit.”[1]).  It was grievous because the dispute even reached the broader community.  Whenever the reputation of Christ is marred it is a indignity.  Clement then calls for a return to a state of brotherly love[2] and repentance[3].   He points to the love of Moses who was willing to intercede with God for the preservation of Israel (Exodus 32).  He appeals to us to live out this ethic:

 “If on my account sedition and disagreement and schisms have arisen, I will depart, I will go away whithersoever ye desire, and I will do whatever the majority commands; only let the flock of Christ live on terms of peace with the presbyters set over it.”[4]
 
He provides examples of such love both from an Apocryphal story of Judith; and of the Old Testament example of Esther  who was prepared to die to preserve her people.  He calls those who are acting in seditious ways to submit to correction and submit to the Church:
 

“Ye therefore, who laid the foundation of this sedition, submit yourselves to the presbyters, and receive correction so as to repent, bending the knees of your hearts. Learn to be subject, laying aside the proud and arrogant self-confidence of your tongue. For it is better for you that ye should occupy a humble but honourable place in the flock of Christ, than that, being highly exalted, ye should be cast out from the hope of His people.”[5]

 Clement concludes this exhortation with a blessing and a hope to hear that things have gone well.

 As to issues of authority, Clement rests heavily on Scripture which he readily acknowledges as inspired by the Holy Spirit.  He quotes from other sources including the Apocrypha but gives no evidence of its inspiration.  This is an argument from silence, I admit.  He clearly sees the authority of the church residing in presbyters of which I have shown elsewhere is synonymous with elders, bishops, and pastors.

 


[1] Schaff, Philip (2009-06-08). Ante-Nicene Fathers Volume 1 - Enhanced Version (Early Church Fathers) (Kindle Locations 1289-1290). Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Kindle Edition.
[2] “Ye see, beloved, how great and wonderful a thing is love, and that there is no declaring its perfection.” -  Schaff, Philip (2009-06-08). Ante-Nicene Fathers Volume 1 - Enhanced Version (Early Church Fathers) (Kindle Location 1344). Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Kindle Edition.
[3] Ibid, (Kindle Locations 1382-1383).
[4] Ibid, (Kindle Locations 1423-1425).
[5] Ibid, (Kindle Locations 1496-1500).