Making Sense of God’s Covenant with Noah

Making Sense of God’s Covenant with Noah

Background

The Noahic Covenant, found in Genesis 9:8-17, is the promise that God made to Noah and his descendants after the flood that He would never again destroy the earth by water and would preserve it through to Christ’s Coming. The Noahic Covenant has several distinguishing features. First, it is an unconditional covenant. Second, it was made to Noah and all his descendants as well as “every living creature” and the earth in general (Genesis 9:8-10). This means that it is a Covenant made to all humanity, not just Israel, nor the Church. Third, it was sealed with a sign, the rainbow, as a perpetual reminder of this gracious (gracious because it is unconditional) promise.

Alister Wilson and James A. Grant remind us that “the idea of covenant is fundamental to the Bible’s story. At its most basic, covenant presents God’s desire to enter into relationship with men and women created in his image ... Covenant is all about relationship between the Creator and his creation.” [The God of Covenant]. Daniel C. Lane would add that it is made under oath, “under threat of divine curse.” [The Mean and Use of the Old Testament Term Covenant].

Important to our topic of the The Noahic Covenant, Peter Gentry [Kingdom Through Covenant] has highlighted the crucial difference between “creating a covenant” (karat berit) and “renewing/establishing a covenant previously created” (heqim berit). Why is that important? It is because heqim berit is the only phrase used in the Covenant with Noah. This is important because it implies that the Noahic Covenant is not new but in fact a re-affirmation of an earlier Covenant, namely the Creation Covenant or named by some, The Adamic Covenant. The only difference is that the Covenant with Adam involved an innocent person. The Covenant with Noah is with sinful humankind.

As noted previously the Noahic Covenant is made unilaterally or unconditionally. The context of a sinful humanity in a curse world cannot thwart the promise of God. Peter Gentry also makes the case that when the term Covenant is used it should be viewed as the other side of the word Torah. The Torah is the instruction given within the Covenant. Gentry likens it to “faith” and “repentance” which are two-sides of the same coin. This is critical to understanding the Noahic Covenant, for there is both the Covenant stated and the instructions within the Covenant that form the whole. So we see this in the Noahic Covenant. It includes the Promise (the Covenant) and the Torah (instructions or stewardship of the Covenant).

Examining the Scripture passage the following structural diagram tries to portray the Author’s intent.

Summary

The Covenant Promise: God will preserve the world until the Coming of Christ (2 Peter 3:10). 

The Covenant Torah (Instruction): God gave Noah and all future descendants stewardship over the world, including caring for it, cultivating it, and eating animals without fear of punishment. And secondly, He gave all humanity the responsibility of preserving life. All humankind is to be “pro life.”

The Covenant Sign: The sign of the covenant was the rainbow, which God set in the clouds. God said, “When the bow is in the clouds, I will see it and remember the gracious and kind Covenant” (Genesis 9:16). 

 

The New Testament picks up this expression, often referred to as “common grace.”  In Matthew 5:45b we hear these words of Jesus: “for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.”  What Promise is behind this grace of God? “Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done. While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.” (Genesis 8:21-22)

 

Implications

 

In the Noahic Covenant made with all humanity, regardless of moral character, religion or nationality, God promises to preserve the earth as long as it remains (or better: until Christ comes). This has incredible implications to current discussions on climate and the environment. Lest one become callous and seek to avoid any responsibility in that topic we are reminded that in this Covenant we are instructed to be stewards of creation.

 

Another aspect to the instructions within the Covenant includes the preservation of life. Current debates on abortion, euthanasia, voluntary suicide (MAID), etc., are assumed under this Covenant. I believe the concept of the value of human life also includes discussion on race, culture, and social status, etc. All humans bear God’s image and express equal value. The topic becomes huge when you consider categories such as medical/health care, self-defence and so on.

 

Lastly, God makes a covenant of grace to sinful humanity. The same holy and righteous God that created the world, established the Creation Covenant, re-affirms this Covenant. The experience of the Flood underscores His justice and wrath. Yet for a time He withholds His judgment and permits sinful man to enjoy both “the sunshine and the rain.”  But this is for a time. The Apostle Peter writes, “But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed” (2 Peter 3:10).

 

As God did in the Flood, so too He does as the world expects the pending wrath of God — He offers a way of escape. Again, we hear Peter, “The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). Do not take advantage of this period of Common Grace, this period of the Noahic Covenant. There is judgment coming but “God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life,” Jesus (John 3:16).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Gospel or No Gospel

Introductory Essay to John Owen’s Death of Death in the Death of Christ by J. I. Packer[1]

 

This introductory essay is worth every moment the reader will take to digest every thought of the late Dr. J.I. Packer.  In these initial paragraphs Dr. Packer sets the stage by comparing two Gospels.  It is not a comparison of heresy versus orthodoxy, because both “Gospels” have the similar content and words.  The difference lies in what and how the “Gospels” are communicated.  In his own words he writes, “The whole perspective and emphasis of gospel preaching has changed.” This new Gospel has been categorized as “attractional”, “user-friendly”, “relevant”, or “therapeutic”.  I have found that you have to attend or observe services of this type rather than try to categorize them.  But in Dr. Packer’s words they are centred upon this “new Gospel”.  Note Packer’s comparison:

 

“. . . Without realising it, we have during the past century bartered that gospel for a substitute product which, though it looks similar enough in points of detail, is as a whole a decidedly different thing. Hence our troubles; for the substitute product does not answer the ends for which the authentic gospel has in past days proved itself so mighty. 

 

The new gospel conspicuously fails to produce deep reverence, deep repentance, deep humility, a spirit of worship, a concern for the church. Why? We would suggest that the reason lies in its own character and content. It fails to make men God-centred in their thoughts and God-fearing in their hearts because this is not primarily what it is trying to do.One way of stating the difference between it and the old gospel is to say that it is too exclusively concerned to be “helpful” to man—to bring peace, comfort, happiness, satisfaction—and too little concerned to glorify God.

 

The old gospel was “helpful,” too—more so, indeed, than is the new—but (so to speak) incidentally, for its first concern was always to give glory to God. It was always and essentially a proclamation of Divine sovereignty in mercy and judgment, a summons to bow down and worship the mighty Lord on whom man depends for all good, both in nature and in grace. Its centre of reference was unambiguously God.

 

But in the new gospel the centre of reference is man. This is just to say that the old gospel was religious in a way that the new gospel is not. Whereas the chief aim of the old was to teach men to worship God, the concern of the new seems limited to making them feel better. The subject of the old gospel was God and His ways with men; the subject of the new is man and the help God gives him . . ..”

 

As I have attended or watched these “new Gospel” churches I sense I have been drawn into a spiritualized Ted-Talk. However, in Pauline thought there is really just one Gospel.  So, this so-called “new Gospel” is actually no Gospel at all.  Attendees leave psychologically and emotionally pumped up devoid of God-centred thoughts, Christ-centred pursuits, or Word-driven behaviours. 

 

 

 

---

[1] https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/packer_deathintro.html

Is Mental Health a Biblical Concept?

Is Mental Health a Biblical Concept? [1]

By: Garrett Higbee

Selected Quotations:

“I think it is important to note that our epistemology, anthropology, and etiology differ from our secular counterparts, who are measuring secular well-being. We see personal sin at the root of mental dysfunction and sin’s effects on this world causing tremendous suffering. We are not ignorant of human weakness and, in effect, mental illness as a result of the fall (Gen. 3), but we measure and treat it differently. Our truth as Christians is not simply based on objective and empirical evidence but also on the unseen (Eph. 6:10-12) and the authority of Scripture (2 Tim. 3:16-17).”

“Secular scientists, while often well-meaning in their pursuit of mental health, are searching in vain without understanding the power of the Cross to redeem relationship and peace with our Creator. Thus, if we pursue mental health through means of addressing symptoms and focusing on self-esteem, self-help, and self-sufficiency, we too will reap misery in the end (Matt. 10:39).”

“I believe we must continue to develop ways to reframe issues and guide our people to a biblical worldview of mental illness (Col. 2:8). While causality may vary, based on Scripture, we believe that every “mental illness” has a spiritual origin (Jer. 17:9; Rom. 1:20-24). Having a holistic and biblical perspective of man, we cannot let mental health assessment, standards, and care be abdicated to the secular therapeutic community as it has for over a century.”

“God left us the key to true mental health in His Word, the gospel. The standard for wellness is a heart redeemed by and satisfied in Christ (Ezek. 11:19). A life where we are growing a Christ-like character, mindset, and demeanor is a believer’s “new normal” (2 Cor. 5:17; Gal. 2:20, Phil. 2:1-5) and the baseline for mental health in a biblical worldview. There is a paradigm shift from being conformed to a set of criteria that the world calls functional to being transformed through progressive sanctification (Rom. 12:1-2). But how? First, by abiding in Christ in deep dependency (John 15), second, by being mindful of Christ in all that we do (2 Cor. 3:18), and third, by being renewed in our thinking primarily through His Word (Eph. 4:22-24). Scripture does not mention mental health but does use words like shalom, joy, soul rest, contentment, and blessed to describe a person at peace in Christ (Ps. 4:8; 119:165; Prov. 3:17; Isa. 26:3; 32:17; John 20:21; Acts 10:36).

[Emphasis mine}

_____________________________________

1. https://www.biblicalcounselingcoalition.org/2022/04/25/is-mental-health-a-biblical-concept/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=is-mental-health-a-biblical-concept

Lament for a Son

 In Lament for a Son[1] Nicholas Wolterstorff writes not as a scholar but as a loving father grieving the loss of his son. The book is in one sense a narrative account of events--from the numbing telephone call on a sunny Sunday afternoon that tells of 25-year-old Eric's death in a mountain-climbing accident, to a graveside visit a year later. Lament for a Son gives expression to a grief that is at once unique and universal--a grief for an individual, irreplaceable person.

Quotable Quotes

“Often, I am asked whether the grief remains as intense as when I wrote. The answer is, No. The wound is no longer raw. But it has not disappeared. That is as it should be. If he was worth loving, he is worth grieving over. Grief is existential testimony to the worth of the one loved. That worth abides.”

“It’s the neverness that is so painful. Never again to be here with us—never to sit with us at table, never to travel with us, never to laugh with us, never to cry with us, never to embrace us.”

“IT’S SO WRONG, SO profoundly wrong, for a child to die before its parents. It’s hard enough to bury our parents. But that we expect. Our parents belong to our past, our children belong to our future. We do not visualize our future without them. How can I bury my son, my future, one of the next in line? He was meant to bury me!”

“His death is things to do not done—never to be done.”

“THERE’S A HOLE in the world now. In the place where he was, there’s now just nothing. A center, like no other, of memory and hope and knowledge and affection which once inhabited this earth is gone. Only a gap remains. A perspective on this world unique in this world which once moved about within this world has been rubbed out. Only a void is left . . .  A person, an irreplaceable person, is gone. Never again will anyone apprehend the world quite the way he did. Never again will anyone inhabit the world the way he did. Questions I have can never now get answers. The world is emptier. My son is gone. Only a hole remains, a void, a gap, never to be filled.”

“I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and resurrecter of Jesus Christ. I also believe that my son’s life was cut off in its prime. I cannot fit these pieces together. I am at a loss. I have read the theodicies produced to justify the ways of God to man. I find them unconvincing. To the most agonized question I have ever asked I do not know the answer. I do not know why God would watch him fall. I do not know why God would watch me wounded. I cannot even guess.”

“WITH THESE HANDS I lifted him from his cradle—tiny then, soft, warm, and squirming with life. Now at the end with these same hands I touched him in his coffin.”

“And at the end, that we now must learn to live as faithfully and authentically with Eric gone as we had tried to do with Eric present.”

“I will indeed remind myself that there’s more to life than pain. I will accept joy. But I will not look away from Eric dead. Its demonic awfulness I will not ignore. I owe that—to him and to God.”

“I cannot fit it together at all. I can only, with Job, endure. I do not know why God did not prevent Eric’s death. To live without the answer is precarious. It’s hard to keep one’s footing.”

“Will the family all be home for Christmas?” . . . “What are your children doing now?” . . .  “How many children do you have?”

“HIS YOUNGER brothers had begun to ask him for advice. To Claire and me he had become an equal, no longer a child to be cared for. Now he’s gone, and the family has to restructure itself. We don’t just each have a gap inside us but together a gap among us. We have to live differently with each other. We have to live around the gap. Pull one out, and everything changes.”

“The mourners are those who have caught a glimpse of God’s new day, who ache with all their being for that day’s coming, and who break out into tears when confronted with its absence.”

“Lament is part of life.”

 

---

[1] Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Lament for a Son. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. Kindle Edition.

 

Laura to Jake and back again - After trying to live as a man for years, Laura Perry finds Christ’s love in the process of detransitioning

IN 2016, LAURA EMBRACED God’s design for her as a woman. It meant leaving her partner of eight years, a high-paying tech job, her home in Tulsa, and an identity she lived for nearly a decade. She shaved her beard for the first time in five years. When she stopped taking testosterone, she experienced withdrawal symptoms, including massive headaches that left her curled in a fetal position. She recalls venturing into the women’s clothing section at Kohl’s and trying on a dress. The mirror reflected a flat, hairy chest, a short haircut, and a five o’clock shadow: “I was horrified by what I had done to myself.”

To read more click HERE.

See also:  What is Transgenderism by Rosaria  Butterfield 

Remembering the Way God Remembers

I've been developing some concern about our sacred institution of Remembrance Day.  As a former peace-time, infantry officer; and as one who has hardly missed involvement in November 11th, I think I have some sweat equity in the event.   I served for about 10 years as a Legion chaplain and became even more cynical. So here goes!

The mantra from sea-to-sea in our country, is "we remember our fallen heroes."  Most speeches include a sense of gratitude for the freedoms we have today.  Undoubtedly that is true.  But it's not placid gratitude that ought to drive our Remembrance Day ceremonies.  Lieutenant-Colonel McCrae said it best in the last stanza of his infamous poem:

Take up our quarrel with the foe:

To you from failing hands we throw

   The torch; be yours to hold it high.

   If ye break faith with us who die

We shall not sleep, though poppies grow

         In Flanders fields.

We ought to remember the way God remembers.   When we read in the Bible that "God remembers", we might get an image of a senile old man that try as he wish, he can't seem to recall what he is supposed to know.   That's not the God of the Bible.  That's not the eternal, self-existent, self-sufficient, omniscient, omnipotent God that is.  When the Scriptures use the term that "God remembered", the Holy Spirit is teaching us that God is acting upon His promises.   He is acting.  The best thing that can be said for any person is that God remembered them.

• Genesis 8:1 (NIV) ¹ But God remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth, and the waters receded.
• Genesis 19:29 (NIV) ²⁹ So when God destroyed the cities of the plain, he remembered Abraham, and he brought Lot out of the catastrophe that overthrew the cities where Lot had lived.
• Genesis 30:22 (NIV) ²² Then God remembered Rachel; he listened to her and enabled her to conceive.
• 1 Samuel 1:19 (NIV) ¹⁹ Early the next morning they arose and worshiped before the Lord and then went back to their home at Ramah. Elkanah made love to his wife Hannah, and the Lord remembered her.
• Jeremiah 31:20 (NIV) ²⁰ Is not Ephraim my dear son, the child in whom I delight? Though I often speak against him, I still remember him. Therefore my heart yearns for him; I have great compassion for him,” declares the Lord.
• Psalm 105:42 (NIV) ⁴² For he remembered his holy promise given to his servant Abraham.

Remembrance Day ought to be a call to action, not simply a time of reflection, albeit thankfulness. There ought to be a firm resolve with all who "remember" to "take up the quarrel with the foe."  The Bible says that “Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin condemns any people.” (Proverbs 14:34, NIV). The greatest foe to Canada today is rampant unrighteousness.  The enemy is not a foreign nation, it is a foreign deity. “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” (Ephesians 6:12, NIV).

My grandfather and uncles served in both World Wars.  Neither war was ultimately driven by geo-political agendas.  The Divine diagnosis is simple, yet profound: “What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you? You desire but do not have, so you kill. You covet but you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God.” (James 4:1–2, NIV)

This is why I weary of Remembrance Day festivities.  It's because we never get to the root of the problem.  We never resolve to do what is necessary based upon the real issue.  We throw out empty and meaningless rhetoric and somehow go home feeling good.  It is the epitome of a secular society borrowing equity from religious ritual. Why not call communities to repent?  Why not call communities to return to God?  Why not plead with the Holy Spirit to rend our hearts and give us hearts that fear God and love neighbors?  I know its too radical.  That's because it is too real.  

“Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord, and that he may send the Messiah, who has been appointed for you—even Jesus.” (Acts 3:19–20, NIV).

Billy Graham is right when he said, "Only the gospel, God’s Good News, has the power to change lives, heal hearts, and restore a nation." 

Remembrance Day should be about reflection; about resolve, but it should also be about repentance and restoration of a nation to its God -- otherwise it is an empty facade.  The worst news possible is that all of humanity has fallen under the eternal condemnation of God for all of us have violated His glory and His holiness, for which we were created.  The best news possible is that because of God's immense love, He sent His Son, who took on humanity, lived a perfect life and died a substitutionary death for all who will, but put their trust in Him. 

Faith in this redemptive act, applies all of God's grace and goodness, by the Holy Spirit, to the believer; and placates God's righteous wrath against us.  His saving power enables the Christian to no longer live for themselves, but for Christ. His saving power grants the ability to conquer sin's power and live a life pleasing to God.  

The Rule To Live By.

Galatians 6:16–18 (NIV),

¹⁶ Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule—to the Israel of God. ¹⁷ From now on, let no one cause me trouble, for I bear on my body the marks of Jesus. ¹⁸ The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brothers and sisters. Amen.

Now Paul adds this conclusion.  "Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule."   What is the rule that he is referring to?  Luther writes, "This is the only and true rule wherein we ought to walk, namely, the new creature." [1] That is from the verse just preceding, e.g., "he speaketh of the new creature, which is neither circumcision nor uncircumcision, but the new man created unto the image of God in righteousness and true holiness which inwardly is righteous in the spirit, and outwardly is holy and clean in the flesh." [1]

Other Commentators think that Paul's conclusion is more general, as applying to the Gospel.  For instance, "man needs a standard or a measuring rod to guide his steps. The law was a failure, so God has given us another standard, placing all our hopes of salvation in the crucified, buried, risen, and coming again Christ." [2]  Actually I find that verse 15 is amplifying verse 14.

“May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation.” (Galatians 6:14–15, NIV)  

So, I think that "the rule" applies to verse 14.  The rule is don't glory in the flesh; glory in the Cross. And to those who do, they will experience peace and mercy.   Then Paul identifies this group that glories only in Christ and the Cross.  He calls them the Israel of God.    "As if he said: They are the Israel of God, which with faithful Abraham believe the promises of God offered already in Christ, whether they be Jews or Gentiles, and not they which are begotten of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, after the flesh." [1]  This, of course, was handled by Paul in Galatians 3.  This is a clear contrast to ethnic Israel. "Those who received the Saviour who came through Israel are true Israelites, spiritual descendants of Abraham." [2].   This is the group were the promises of God and the peace and mercy of Christ belong.  

"I have faithfully taught the Gospel as I have received it by the revelation of Jesus Christ; whoso will not follow it, let him follow what he will, so that hereafter he trouble me no more." [3] Paul has expended his ammunition.  He has stated his case.  And to put the final nail in the argument he points to his own suffering.  Luther explains this well:

Paul is saying that "the marks that be in my body do show well enough whose servant I am. If I sought to please men, requiring circumcision and the keeping of the law as necessary to salvation, and rejoicing in your flesh as the false apostles do, I needed not to bear these marks in my body. But because I am the servant of Jesus Christ and walk after a true rule, that is, I openly teach and confess, that no man can obtain the favour of God, righteousness and salvation, but by Christ alone, therefore it behoveth me to bear the badges of Christ my Lord: which be not marks of mine own procuring, but are laid upon me against my will by the world and the devil, for none other cause but for that I preach Jesus to be Christ." [3]

“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brothers and sisters. Amen.” (Galatians 6:18, NIV) "A fitting conclusion to the letter in which Paul is most intensely concerned with God’s grace. The benediction summarizes Paul’s hope that among the Galatians the gospel of God’s grace will triumph." [4]  He begins and ends the Letter with grace.   

Steve and Vicki Cooke [5] wrote the words to this song:

I will glory in my Redeemer

Whose priceless blood has ransomed me.

Mine was the sin that drove the bitter nails

And hung Him on that judgment tree.

I will glory in my Redeemer

Who crushed the power of sin and death

My only Savior before the holy Judge

The Lamb who is my righteousness

The Lamb who is my righteousness.

This is my song of praise to You Father, this day as I conclude this great Letter.  My only Savior -- who is my righteousness.   Thank You Father.  Praise You, Jesus Christ. All glory to the Lamb.

____________________________

1. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 6:16). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

2. KJV Bible Commentary. 1994 (E. E. Hindson & W. M. Kroll, Ed.) (2402). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

3. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 6:17). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

4. Whitlock, L. G., Sproul, R. C., Waltke, B. K., & Silva, M. (1995). The Reformation study Bible: Bringing the light of the Reformation to Scripture: New King James Version (Ga 6:18). Nashville: T. Nelson.

5. © 2001 Sovereign Grace Worship (Admin. by EMI Christian Music Publishing (IMI))

• Steve Cook | Vikki Cook

The Sum and Substance of the Letter.

Paul has exposed the motives of those who would lead the Galatian Christians away.  They were trying to avoid persecution and they were trying to gain "brownie points" -- score some converts to their new religion of "Christ+plus".  Paul also unmasked the real problem with "Christ+plus".  It robs the Cross of its glory and power.  He had already said that in Galatians 2:21 (NIV),

²¹ I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”

So now he says, “May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation.” (Galatians 6:14–15, NIV).  This is the crux and the summary of the whole argument.  "It is striking how much of the gospel is involved in this statement. The cross speaks of the atonement necessitated by man's sin. The full name of the Savior speaks of the significance of his person and the role he played, meaning literally "God who saves, the Messiah." Finally, the pronoun "our" speaks of the personal aspects of Christ's redemption, for it becomes "ours" through the response of faith." [1]

"This is a wonderful kind of speech which Paul here useth, when he saith: “Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision availeth anything.” It may seem that he should rather have said: Either circumcision or uncircumcision availeth somewhat, seeing these are two contrary things . . . When works are done, they bring indeed a new shew and outward appearance wherewith the world and the flesh are delighted, but not a new creature: for the heart remaineth wicked as it was before, full of the contempt of God, infidelity, &c.  [2]  

"The only thing that is important is to be a new creation in Christ (2 Cor 5:17). “He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son hath not life” (1 Jn 5:12)." [3]

This then becomes the sum and the essence of the argument.  Works, good deeds, religious performances are nothing.  What a person needs is the transforming work of the Spirit, called the New Birth and belief in the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.   

Father by works I am condemned.  By lack of works I am condemned.  There is no Gospel in religion. There is no hope in ritual.  Only Christ saves.  Only the Gospel is the power of God unto salvation. Only faith in Christ alone justifies. There is no other boasting, except in the Cross of Christ.  He alone bore our sins on His own body on the tree.  Thank you Lord Jesus.  Thank you Father for the regenerating, renewing, resurrecting power of the Spirit.  Apart from You I can do nothing.  Fill my heart with Your grace today that I might serve You in all that I do.  For the glory of Christ and the glory of the Cross, I pray.  Amen.

____________________________________

1. Expositor's Bible Commentary, The, Pradis CD-ROM:Galatians/Exposition of Galatians/Conclusion (6:11-18), Book Version: 4.0.2

2. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 6:15). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

3. KJV Bible Commentary. 1994 (E. E. Hindson & W. M. Kroll, Ed.) (2402). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

 

A Genuine Pastor's Heart

Galatians 4:12–20 (NIV),

¹² I plead with you, brothers and sisters, become like me, for I became like you. You did me no wrong. ¹³ As you know, it was because of an illness that I first preached the gospel to you, ¹⁴ and even though my illness was a trial to you, you did not treat me with contempt or scorn. Instead, you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself. ¹⁵ Where, then, is your blessing of me now? I can testify that, if you could have done so, you would have torn out your eyes and given them to me. ¹⁶ Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? ¹⁷ Those people are zealous to win you over, but for no good. What they want is to alienate you from us, so that you may have zeal for them. ¹⁸ It is fine to be zealous, provided the purpose is good, and to be so always, not just when I am with you. ¹⁹ My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you, ²⁰ how I wish I could be with you now and change my tone, because I am perplexed about you!

Luther is right when he states that "this place is not dialectical, but full of affections, which must be handled rhetorically." [1]  He means that Paul is not arguing his case here, but is appealing to the Galatians on an emotional level rather than a doctrinal level.  We are to read it that way.    So Paul appeals to the Galatians to hold to the same affection, the same charity that he has toward them.  Not all agree with this interpretation.  For example consider this notation:  "In order to bring the gospel to the Gentile Galatians, Paul had to leave behind the legal restrictions of the Mosaic ceremonial law that forbade Jewish interaction with Gentiles (1 Cor. 9:19–23). Paul became “like” the Galatians in freedom from the law and he now encourages them to be “like” him in freedom from legalistic bondage." [2]

Paul has applied a scathing rebuke to these believers but he affirms that their behavior did not do wrong to him.  In other words: "ye have not offended me, but yourselves, and therefore I am thus troubled, not for mine own cause, but for the love I bear unto you." [3]  Paul then reminds them of his time with them.  He refers to an illness that they bore admirably; and they welcomed him in a godly manner.   "The exact nature of this illness is not known. “Because” apparently means that Paul was detained in Galatia by this illness and therefore took the opportunity to preach to them." [4]  Luther likens this illness as part of Paul's affliction through persecution.  "We see then that Paul calleth “infirmities of the flesh” the afflictions which he suffered in the flesh, like as the other Apostles, the prophets, and all godly men did; notwithstanding he was mighty in spirit . . . Now this infirmity of the flesh in the godly doth wonderfully offend reason. Therefore Paul so highly commendeth the Galatians, because they were not offended with this great infirmity, and these vile [and contemptible] forms of the cross which they saw in him; but received him as an angel, yea as Christ Jesus." [5]

Now Paul plays his trump card.  “What has happened to the satisfaction you felt at that time? There were some of you then who, if possible, would have given your very eyes to me—that is how deeply you cared!” (Galatians 4:15, The Message).  What has changed?  "Am I an enemy because I told you the truth,?" Paul asks.  And then "he reproveth here the flattery of the false apostles. For Satan is wont, by his ministers, through wonderful subtilty and crafty sleights to beguile the simple, as Paul saith: “With fair speech and flattery they deceive the hearts of the simple” (Rom. xvi. 18)." [5]

"As if he said: True it is that they are very zealous towards you, but by this means they seek that ye again should be zealous towards them and reject me." [5]   Zealousness and a seemingly loving approach do not in themselves mean that these false apostles are sincere.  They are simply 'sheepstealers.'  "It is fine to be zealous, provided the purpose is good." [6]  "It is good for someone to take a warm interest in you in an honorable manner. Paul zealously sought the Galatians for Christ, and he welcomes all such efforts in relation to the gospel of Christ." [7]

Verse 19 exudes the tone of a true pastor, a true shepherd of the flock: “My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you,”  "In the OT, the image of a woman in distress during childbirth is juxtaposed with an act of great deliverance (Isa 42:14). Jesus also used this imagery when speaking to His disciples (John 16:21–22). Paul hopes that this letter will deliver the Galatians from the agitators’ distortion of the gospel." [8]

"Now, the form of a Christian mind is faith, or the confidence of the heart that layeth hold upon Christ, and cleaveth to him alone, and to nothing else." [9]  Paul would rather be there with them than write to them.  He believes his tone would be different in that case.  He longs to care for them as a true shepherd.  “. . . I am perplexed about you!” (Galatians 4:20b, NIV).   This is the Greek word ἀπορέω meaning: to be without resources, to be in straits, to be left wanting, to be embarrassed, to be in doubt, not to know which way to turn, etc. [10]   "Paul was at his wits’ end, not knowing the best way to prevent them from the error into which they were drifting." [11]  This too is the heart of a true pastor. The false shepherds have all the answers.  The true shepherds are perplexed within but know the One who does have the answer!

Father this is an insightful, challenging, comforting, convicting paragraph from Paul's pen.  As a pastor, it is timely and relevant.  Sometimes the shepherding of Your sheep is the most perplexing task.  With a sincere love for the truth and the people to whom You have given me responsibility I am often amazed at what I hear and see.  I think of those brothers and sisters who are affirming and kind and yet seem to unconsciously run after teachers that carry false and destructive messages. It's a quandary! Do they not hear me?  Is their applause simply fool's gold?  Father I pray that my heart will remain as the Apostles, loving and kind -- hopeful and confident, in You.  It's not about me.  It is my pride that assumes that everything I say and do has substantial affect.  Sometimes we have to hear things over and over to get it.  At the same time I do appreciate the love and encouragement that I get.  I will live with these times of perplexity and trust you to work them through.  I have a Great Shepherd.  To even His disciples He said they were "slow of learning."  But I too am His disciple and am no better than any other.  My Lord must look at me many times and be perplexed. "Why doesn't he get it?" He must think.   Thank you for the Cross.  Thank you for the Blood.  Thank you for the truth that nothing can snatch me from Your hand.   Lord Jesus, become fully formed in me and my Church.  Grant a Spirit-wrought revival of Christian maturity, for the glory of Christ. Amen.







___________________________________________
1. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 4:12). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
2. Whitlock, L. G., Sproul, R. C., Waltke, B. K., & Silva, M. (1995). The Reformation study Bible: Bringing the light of the Reformation to Scripture: New King James Version (Ga 4:12). Nashville: T. Nelson.
3. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 4:12). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
4. Crossway Bibles. (2008). The ESV Study Bible (2252). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles.
5. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 4:13). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
6. The New International Version. 2011 (Ga 4:18). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
7. KJV Bible Commentary. 1994 (E. E. Hindson & W. M. Kroll, Ed.) (2393). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
8. Barry, J. D., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Mangum, D., & Whitehead, M. M. (2012). Faithlife Study Bible (Ga 4:19). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.
9. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 4:19). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
10. Strong, J. (2001). Enhanced Strong’s Lexicon. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software
11. KJV Bible Commentary. 1994 (E. E. Hindson & W. M. Kroll, Ed.) (2393). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

Global Blessing!

Galatians 3:8–9 (NIV)

⁸ Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: “All nations will be blessed through you.” ⁹ So those who rely on faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith.

Abraham was a Gentile, a non-Jew. God imputed righteousness to Abraham simply because he believed.  Likewise the argument of Paul is that all (Jew or Gentile) who have faith in Christ are counted righteous.  Paul makes it plain that this is the Gospel.  The Gospel isn't a New Testament invention.  In this argument Paul confounds two errors: One, is that the people of the Old Testament were saved differently than those of the New; and Secondly that there are two peoples of God.  From all time there has been one means of salvation and only one; and this one means produces but one people.  

The Jews according to the flesh, according to the Law have absolutely no righteous standing before God.  Neither do any of any of nation.  Our only hope is to trust Christ as Abraham did. "There Abraham by the promise of God is appointed a father of many nations, and the inheritance of the world for his posterity and issue after him, is given unto him before the law was published . . . the inheritance of the Gentiles was given unto Abraham, not by the law and circumcision, but long before the same, by the only righteousness of faith."  [1] 

How is the world blessed?  "The Greek present tense shows the blessing to be axiomatic, and the passive voice shows that God is the blesser." [2]   "The blessing to the nations in the context of Galatians is the gift of justification by faith and the Spirit. " [3]  Luther answers: "Hereby then we see that to bless signifieth nothing else, but (as I said before) to preach and teach the word of the Gospel, to confess Christ, and to spread abroad the knowledge of him among all the Gentiles . . . Therefore, like as Abraham obtained imputation of righteousness by the hearing of faith; even so did all the Gentiles obtain, and yet do obtain the same. For the same Word that was first declared unto Abraham, was also afterward published to all the Gentiles." [4]

The conclusion is clear: "Hereof it followeth that the blessing and faith of Abraham is the same that ours is; that Abraham’s Christ is our Christ; that Christ died as well for the sins of Abraham as for ours. For “Abraham saw my day and rejoiced” (John viii. 56). All things therefore are the same." [4]

"The true children of Abraham share his faith, whether they are physically descended from him or not. The promise to Abraham is also a promise of blessing to the Gentiles, a blessing that must be received with faith like Abraham’s." [5]

Father, four thousand years ago You granted to Abraham saving faith in Your Son, Jesus; his Messiah.  He longed to see His day and His day has come.  The simple yet profound trust in the promise of God was counted by You righteous.  Nothing has changed over all these years.  Still today if we but simply believe the Promise of Your Christ, we shall be saved.  This is a great blessing to the whole world.  Palestinians, Germans, Filipinos and Jews all may receive justifying grace by simply believing the Gospel.  There can be no greater blessing upon a nation, upon a family or upon an individual than to hear, see and respond to the Gospel.  Grant that many will be saved this day -- especially those of our loved ones that weigh heavily upon our hearts.  For Christ's glory we pray; and for the joy of all the nations.  Amen!

______________________

1. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 3:8). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

2. KJV Bible Commentary. 1994 (E. E. Hindson & W. M. Kroll, Ed.) (2385). Nashville: Thomas Nelson. 

3. Barry, J. D., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Mangum, D., & Whitehead, M. M. (2012). Faithlife Study Bible (Ga 3:8). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

4. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 3:8). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

5. Whitlock, L. G., Sproul, R. C., Waltke, B. K., & Silva, M. (1995). The Reformation study Bible: Bringing the light of the Reformation to Scripture: New King James Version (Ga 3:6). Nashville: T. Nelson.

Check Out Your Experience

Galatians 3:2–5 (NIV),

² I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard? ³ Are you so foolish? After beginning by means of the Spirit, are you now trying to finish by means of the flesh? ⁴ Have you experienced so much in vain—if it really was in vain? ⁵ So again I ask, does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law, or by your believing what you heard?

Paul asks several questions here, all intended to show the foolishness of these people in seeking to revert back to the Law.  Whereas Paul rests his case upon doctrinal matters, in this part of his argument he causes them to look to their experience.

1. When you were saved (when you received the Spirit) was it because of adherence to the Law or by faith in Christ?  

2. Do you think that you start your Christian journey by faith in Christ but perfect it by obedience, making it certain?

3. Having believed the Gospel and already experiencing suffering because of that, will you count that as nothing and now reject it?

4. When you see the people changed, transformed and healed, is that because they obey the Law or believe in Christ?

Luther allows no middle ground on salvation.  "If by the law, then not by the preaching of faith; if by the preaching of faith, then not by the law. There is no mean betwixt these two. For all that is not the Holy Ghost or the preaching of faith, is the law . . . For they which are ignorant of the righteousness of God, and go about to establish their own righteousness (as Paul saith in another place) do not submit themselves unto the righteousness of God (Rom. x. 3)." [1]  In his commentary, Luther walks the reader through the Book of Acts and even into the Old Testament account of Gentiles that were saved -- all by looking to Christ and not to the Law.

"For as God gave the Holy Ghost to the Gentiles which lived without the law, by the preaching of the Gospel, so did he give the same to the Jews; yet not by the law, nor by the ceremonies and sacrifices commanded in the law, but by the only preaching of faith." [1] 

This matter of how the Old Testament saints were saved is important.  In summary we find that they too were saved by faith in the promised Messiah.  Click HERE to read more.

When Paul uses the word flesh here to suggest that these Christians thought they could be perfected by the flesh.  "Flesh therefore is here taken for the very righteousness and wisdom of the flesh, and the judgment of reason, which seeketh to be justified by the law. Whatsoever then is most excellent in man, the same here Paul calleth flesh, to wit, the highest wisdom of reason, and the righteousness of the law itself." [1]   There is nothing I can do so perfectly to complete my salvation apart from faith in the righteousness of Christ imputed to me by grace.  Every good and worthy deed is still riddled by sin and cannot save.  Only Christ's perfect merit can save.

As to the suffering, how silly to suffer for a Gospel that can't save. "Now, what a miserable thing is it, so suddenly to lose such inestimable glory and assurance of conscience towards God? Also to endure so many grievous afflictions and perils of goods, wife, children, body and life, and yet notwithstanding to sustain all these things in vain?" [1]

Paul was aware of the miracles that had been accomplished by the Spirit among these believers -- none of which could have happened by law-keeping. "Ye have not only received the Spirit by the hearing of faith, but whatsoever ye have either known or done, it came by the hearing of faith. As though he would say: It was not enough that God gave you once the Spirit; but the same God hath also enriched you with the gifts of the Spirit, and increased the same in you, to the end that when ye have once received the Spirit, it might always grow and be more and more effectual in you." [1]

"Therefore (saith the Apostle) your experience, O ye Galatians, ought to teach you, that these excellent virtues proceeded not of the works of the law: for as ye had them not before the hearing of faith, so ye have them not now, when the false apostles reign in the midst of you." [1]

Father I am amazed at how Your Word helps shape our thinking.  Many of us have been told that our experience is of little value.  I know that experience doesn't replace faith.  I know that experience doesn't usurp faith.  But I learn in this passage that there is an appropriate time to look to our experience.  Of all the times I tried to change and become better, I could accomplish nothing until You saved me and gave me Your Spirit.  Even today we who are Christians know that we can do nothing apart from Your grace.  Yes we are called to obey having received the Good News, but even our obedience cannot take place apart from You in us granting us the desire and the ability.  It is You alone, Father, that makes New Creations of sinners.  The part that is so easy yet so hard to believe is that it all happens by faith -- by faith alone in Christ alone -- but that faith doesn't stand alone.  There is evidence of justification that accompanies salvation.  There is an experience to look too.  Father, by Your Spirit, and through Your Son, may my experience give credence to the Gospel, today.  May my experience give glory to You through Your Son; and may my experience bring everlasting joy to Your redeemed.  Amen!

____________________________________

1. Luther, M. (1997). Commentary on Galatians (Ga 3:2). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.